World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
90
Citations
34016
World Ranking
12111
National Ranking
657

Orhan Sezer publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Orhan Sezer sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 290 publications — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Orhan Sezer D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Orhan Sezer sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 90 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Orhan Sezer is affiliated with Charité - University Medicine Berlin in Germany. Their research primarily focuses on Medicine, with significant contributions to Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology. Their subfields emphasize Molecular Biology, Hematology, and Oncology.

The scientist's work centers around topics such as Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments, Protein Degradation and Inhibitors, Ubiquitin and Proteasome Pathways, and Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology.

Sezer has authored publications in notable venues including:

  • The Lancet Oncology
  • British Journal of Haematology

Recent papers include:

  • Treatment of relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma: recommendations from the International Myeloma Working Group, 2021, The Lancet Oncology
  • Expert review on soft-tissue plasmacytomas in multiple myeloma: definition, disease assessment and treatment considerations, 2021, British Journal of Haematology

The frequent coauthors collaborating with Sezer are:

  • Philippe Moreau
  • Elena Zamagni
  • Artur Jurczyszyn
  • Niels W.C.J. van de Donk
  • Michèle Cavo

Best Publications

  • International Myeloma Working Group updated criteria for the diagnosis of multiple myeloma.

    S. Vincent Rajkumar;Meletios A. Dimopoulos;Antonio Palumbo;Joan Blade

  • Definition of organ involvement and treatment response in immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis (AL): A consensus opinion from the 10th International Symposium on Amyloid and Amyloidosis

    Morie A. Gertz;Ray Comenzo;Rodney H. Falk;Jean Paul Fermand

  • International Myeloma Working Group molecular classification of multiple myeloma: spotlight review.

    R Fonseca;P L Bergsagel;J Drach;J Shaughnessy

  • Prevention of thalidomide- and lenalidomide-associated thrombosis in myeloma

    A. Palumbo;S. V. Rajkumar;M. A. Dimopoulos;P. G. Richardson

  • Risk of progression and survival in multiple myeloma relapsing after therapy with IMiDs and bortezomib: A multicenter international myeloma working group study

    S. K. Kumar;J. H. Lee;J. J. Lahuerta;G. Morgan

  • International Myeloma Working Group guidelines for serum-free light chain analysis in multiple myeloma and related disorders

    A. Dispenzieri;R. Kyle;G. Merlini;J. S. Miguel

  • Escalated-Dose BEACOPP in the Treatment of Patients With Advanced-Stage Hodgkin's Lymphoma: 10 Years of Follow-Up of the GHSG HD9 Study

    Andreas Engert;Volker Diehl;Jeremy Franklin;Andreas Lohri

  • Renal Impairment in Patients With Multiple Myeloma: A Consensus Statement on Behalf of the International Myeloma Working Group

    Meletios A. Dimopoulos;Evangelos Terpos;Asher Chanan-Khan;Nelson Leung

  • Clinical and psychometric validation of an EORTC questionnaire module, the EORTC QLQ-OES18, to assess quality of life in patients with oesophageal cancer.

    J.M Blazeby;T Conroy;E Hammerlid;P Fayers

  • Personalized therapy in multiple myeloma according to patient age and vulnerability: A report of the European Myeloma Network (EMN)

    Antonio Palumbo;Sara Bringhen;Heinz Ludwig;Meletios A. Dimopoulos

  • International Myeloma Working Group Recommendations for the Treatment of Multiple Myeloma–Related Bone Disease

    Evangelos Terpos;Gareth Morgan;Meletios Athanasios Dimopoulos;Matthew T. Drake

  • International myeloma working group consensus statement and guidelines regarding the current role of imaging techniques in the diagnosis and monitoring of multiple Myeloma.

    M Dimopoulos;E Terpos;R L Comenzo;P Tosi

  • Plasma cell leukemia: consensus statement on diagnostic requirements, response criteria and treatment recommendations by the International Myeloma Working Group

    C. Fernández De Larrea;R. A. Kyle;B. G.M. Durie;H. Ludwig

  • Consensus recommendations for risk stratification in multiple myeloma: report of the International Myeloma Workshop Consensus Panel 2

    Nikhil Munshi;Nikhil Munshi;Kenneth Carl Anderson;Leif Bergsagel;John Shaughnessy

  • Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Management of Patients With Multiple Myeloma: A Consensus Statement

    Meletios A. Dimopoulos;Jens Hillengass;Saad Usmani;Elena Zamagni

  • European Myeloma Network Guidelines for the Management of Multiple Myeloma-related Complications

    Evangelos Terpos;Martina Kleber;Monika Engelhardt;Sonja Zweegman

  • International Myeloma Working Group consensus approach to the treatment of multiple myeloma patients who are candidates for autologous stem cell transplantation.

    Michele Cavo;S. Vincent Rajkumar;Antonio Palumbo;Philippe Moreau

  • Clinical and psychometric validation of the EORTC QLQ-CR29 questionnaire module to assess health-related quality of life in patients with colorectal cancer.

    RN Whistance;T Conroy;W Chie;A Costantini

  • RANK ligand and osteoprotegerin in myeloma bone disease

    Orhan Sezer;Ulrike Heider;Ulrike Heider;Ivana Zavrski;Ivana Zavrski;Christian Alexander Kühne;Christian Alexander Kühne

  • Erratum: Risk of progression and survival in multiple myeloma relapsing after therapy with IMiDs and bortezomib: A multicenter international myeloma working group study (Leukemia (2012) 26 (149-157) DOI: 10.1038/leu.2011.196)

    S. K. Kumar;J. H. Lee;J. J. Lahuerta;G. Morgan

Frequent Co-Authors

Hermann Einsele
Hermann Einsele University of Würzburg
Evangelos Terpos
Evangelos Terpos National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
Michele Cavo
Michele Cavo University of Bologna
Pieter Sonneveld
Pieter Sonneveld Erasmus University Rotterdam
Meletios A. Dimopoulos
Meletios A. Dimopoulos National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
Brian G.M. Durie
Brian G.M. Durie Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Antonio Palumbo
Antonio Palumbo University of Turin
Roman Hájek
Roman Hájek University of Ostrava
Jane M Blazeby
Jane M Blazeby University of Bristol
Paul G. Richardson
Paul G. Richardson Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Many students exploring Medicine in the USA also consider related online pathways, especially in nursing and allied health. Online degrees offer flexibility and can be more budget-friendly compared to traditional routes. A key question to consider is how much is online nursing school? Costs can vary greatly, but online programs are often more affordable, with many options available that fit a range of budgets.

For those looking to advance their nursing qualifications, you can find the cheapest dnp programs online, which are ideal for nurses aiming for leadership roles or academic careers. If you’re an RN seeking to obtain your Bachelor of Science in Nursing, the cheapest rn to bsn program online can help you enhance your credentials quickly and affordably.

Even students without a nursing background have options for entering this field. You can consider direct entry online msn programs designed for non-nurses, which allow career changers to make the transition to nursing roles in a shorter time frame.

Exploring these online degrees broadens your healthcare career options and may be a worthwhile step alongside or as an alternative to a traditional medical degree.

Best Scientists Citing Orhan Sezer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles