World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
42
Citations
6223
World Ranking
5613
National Ranking
601

Nigel J. Willby publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nigel J. Willby sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 90 publications — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Nigel J. Willby D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nigel J. Willby sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Nigel J. Willby is affiliated with the University of Stirling in the United Kingdom and specializes in environmental science, with a focus on aquatic ecosystems and related ecological studies. Their research spans across ecology, environmental chemistry, nature and landscape conservation, industrial and manufacturing engineering, and plant science.

The scientist's main research topics include:

  • Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
  • Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology
  • Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment
  • Ecology and biodiversity studies
  • Fish Ecology and Management Studies
  • Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes
  • Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics

Willby has contributed to a number of research publications, with recent papers covering a range of environmental and ecological issues. Notable recent works include:

  • Impacts of multiple stressors on freshwater biota across spatial scales and ecosystems, 2020, published in Nature Ecology & Evolution
  • Pond ecology and conservation: research priorities and knowledge gaps, 2021, published in Ecosphere
  • Estimating nutrient thresholds for eutrophication management: Novel insights from understudied lake types, 2022, published in The Science of The Total Environment
  • Establishing ecologically-relevant nutrient thresholds: A tool-kit with guidance on its use, 2021, published in The Science of The Total Environment
  • Resource recovery and freshwater ecosystem restoration - Prospecting for phytoremediation potential in wild macrophyte stands, 2022, published in Resources Environment and Sustainability

Frequent co-authors in Willby's research include Alan Law, Richard S. Quilliam, David M. Oliver, Jonathan Fletcher, and Zarah Pattison. These collaborations represent ongoing partnerships within related environmental science fields.

The majority of Willby's publications appear in journals such as The Science of The Total Environment, SSRN Electronic Journal, Environmental Research, Landscape Ecology, and River Research and Applications. This consistent publication record reflects engagement with a diverse set of scholarly venues.

Willby's multidisciplinary approach integrates study areas such as ecology and biodiversity, nutrient management, and aquatic ecosystem dynamics, contributing to knowledge that supports environmental research and ecosystem management strategies.

Best Publications

  • Impacts of multiple stressors on freshwater biota across spatial scales and ecosystems.

    Sebastian Birk;Daniel Chapman;Laurence Carvalho;Bryan M. Spears

  • Submerged macrophyte decline in shallow lakes: What have we learnt in the last forty years? ☆

    Geoff Phillips;Nigel Willby;Brian Moss

  • Attribute-based classification of European hydrophytes and its relationship to habitat utilization.

    Nigel J. Willby;Vicky J. Abernethy;Benoît O. L. Demars

  • Phosphorus in groundwater – an overlooked contributor to eutrophication?

    Ian P Holman;Mick J Whelan;Nicholas J K Howden;Pat H Bellamy

  • Classifying aquatic macrophytes as indicators of eutrophication in European lakes

    W. Ellis Penning;Marit Mjelde;Bernard Dudley;Seppo Hellsten

  • The spatial dynamics of vertical migration by Microcystis aeruginosa in a eutrophic shallow lake: A case study using high spatial resolution time-series airborne remote sensing

    Peter Hunter;Andrew Tyler;Nigel Willby;David Gilvear

  • Using ecosystem engineers as tools in habitat restoration and rewilding: beaver and wetlands

    Alan Law;Martin J. Gaywood;Kevin C. Jones;Paul Ramsay

  • Current status and restoration options for floodplains along the Danube River

    Thomas Hein;Ulrich Schwarz;Helmut Habersack;Iulian Nichersu

  • Using aquatic macrophyte community indices to define the ecological status of European lakes

    W. Ellis Penning;Bernard J. Dudley;Marit Mjelde;Seppo Hellsten

  • Changes along a disturbance gradient in the density and composition of propagule banks in floodplain aquatic habitats

    V.J. Abernethy;N.J. Willby

  • Response of submerged macrophyte communities to external and internal restoration measures in north temperate shallow lakes.

    Sabine Hilt;Marta M. Alirangues Nuñez;Elisabeth S. Bakker;Irmgard Blindow

  • Ecological status assessment of European lakes: a comparison of metrics for phytoplankton, macrophytes, benthic invertebrates and fish

    Anne Lyche-Solheim;Christian K. Feld;Sebastian Birk;Geoff Phillips

  • Global variation in the beta diversity of lake macrophytes is driven by environmental heterogeneity rather than latitude

    Janne Alahuhta;Sarian Kosten;Munemitsu Akasaka;Dominique Auderset

  • Plants in aquatic ecosystems: current trends and future directions

    Matthew T. O’Hare;Francisca C. Aguiar;Takashi Asaeda;Elisabeth S. Bakker

  • Intercalibrating classifications of ecological status: Europe's quest for common management objectives for aquatic ecosystems

    S. Birk;N.J. Willby;M.G. Kelly;W. Bonne

  • Leaf dry matter content as an integrative expression of plant palatability: the case of freshwater macrophytes

    A. Elger;N. J. Willby

  • Pond ecology and conservation: research priorities and knowledge gaps

    Matthew J. Hill;Helen M. Greaves;Carl Sayer;Christopher Hassall

  • Can macrophyte harvesting from eutrophic water close the loop on nutrient loss from agricultural land

    Richard S. Quilliam;Melanie A. van Niekerk;David R. Chadwick;Paul Cross

  • Habitat engineering by beaver benefits aquatic biodiversity and ecosystem processes in agricultural streams

    Alan Law;Fiona McLean;Nigel J. Willby

  • Using Remote Sensing to Aid the Assessment of Human Health Risks from Blooms of Potentially Toxic Cyanobacteria

    Peter D. Hunter;Andrew N. Tyler;David J. Gilvear;Nigel J. Willby

  • Tissue nutrient signatures predict herbaceous‐wetland community responses to nutrient availability

    N. J. Willby;N. J. Willby;I. D. Pulford;T. H. Flowers

Frequent Co-Authors

David Gilvear
David Gilvear Plymouth University
Geoff Phillips
Geoff Phillips University of Stirling
Carl D. Sayer
Carl D. Sayer University College London
Sandra Poikane
Sandra Poikane European Commission Joint Research Centre
Martyn Kelly
Martyn Kelly Durham University
Helen Bennion
Helen Bennion University College London
Sebastian Birk
Sebastian Birk University of Duisburg-Essen
Frauke Ecke
Frauke Ecke University of Helsinki
Martin Søndergaard
Martin Søndergaard Aarhus University
Laurence Carvalho
Laurence Carvalho Natural Environment Research Council

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in Ecology and Evolution can often benefit from a strong science or healthcare background, opening doors to a variety of related online degrees. Many professionals interested in environmental science, conservation, or research combine their interests with nursing or healthcare studies, given the overlap in biology, data analysis, and fieldwork.

For those with an Associate Degree in Nursing considering advanced practice, there are asn to fnp programs that offer accelerated pathways toward becoming a Family Nurse Practitioner. If you’re new to the nursing field but hold a bachelor’s in another discipline, you may qualify for msn direct entry programs online designed specifically for non-nurses seeking to transition quickly into advanced nursing roles.

When comparing universities, resources like capella vs chamberlain rn to bsn can help you decide which institution aligns with your goals, learning style, and schedule. For registered nurses aiming to move into higher-level science or administrative roles, consider rn to bsn to msn online programs that bridge undergraduate and master’s qualifications efficiently and affordably.

Best Scientists Citing Nigel J. Willby

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles