World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
32
Citations
3899
World Ranking
3221
National Ranking
1284

Zdzislaw Jackiewicz publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Zdzislaw Jackiewicz sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 202 publications — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

Zdzislaw Jackiewicz D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Zdzislaw Jackiewicz sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Overview

Zdzislaw Jackiewicz is affiliated with Arizona State University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on numerical methods and computational approaches within mathematics and engineering. Over the course of their career, they have contributed to several areas including numerical analysis, computational mechanics, and computational theory and mathematics, with an emphasis on advanced numerical methods applied to differential equations and fluid dynamics.

The main fields of study associated with their work are:

  • Mathematics
  • Engineering
  • Computer Science

The subfields they have worked on include:

  • Numerical Analysis
  • Computational Mechanics
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

Thematic areas covered in their research span topics such as:

  • Numerical methods for differential equations
  • Advanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics
  • Matrix Theory and Algorithms
  • Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics
  • Model Reduction and Neural Networks
  • Differential Equations and Numerical Methods
  • Advanced Optimization Algorithms Research

Zdzislaw Jackiewicz's publication record includes papers primarily published in the following venues:

  • Applied Numerical Mathematics
  • Numerical Algorithms
  • International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids
  • Bulletin of the Iranian Mathematical Society
  • Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics

Some recent papers authored by or associated with Jackiewicz include:

  • "Global error estimation for explicit general linear methods," 2021, Numerical Algorithms
  • "Efficient two-step Runge-Kutta methods for fluid dynamics simulations," 2020, Applied Numerical Mathematics
  • "On the implementation of explicit two-step peer methods with Runge-Kutta stability," 2023, Applied Numerical Mathematics
  • "Explicit two-step Runge-Kutta methods for computational fluid dynamics solvers," 2020, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids
  • "A new class of efficient general linear methods for ordinary differential equations," 2020, Applied Numerical Mathematics

The scientist collaborates frequently with a number of researchers, including:

  • Giuseppe Izzo
  • M. Braś
  • Ali Abdi
  • Gholamreza Hojjati
  • Alejandro Figueroa

Best Publications

  • A general class of two-step Runge-Kutta methods for ordinary differential equations

    Z. Jackiewicz;S. Tracogna

  • General Linear Methods for Ordinary Differential Equations: Jackiewicz/General Linear

    Unknown

  • Spectral collocation and waveform relaxation methods for nonlinear delay partial differential equations

    Z. Jackiewicz;B. Zubik-Kowal

  • Stability analysis of one-step methods for neutral delay-differential equations

    A. Bellen;Z. Jackiewicz;M. Zennaro

  • Implementation of Diagonally Implicit Multistage Integration Methods for Ordinary Differential Equations

    J. C. Butcher;Z. Jackiewicz

  • Convergence of Waveform Relaxation Methods for Differential-Algebraic Systems

    Z. Jackiewicz;M. Kwapisz

  • Diagonally implicit general linear methods for ordinary differential equations

    J. C. Butcher;J. C. Butcher;Zdzislaw Jackiewicz;Zdzislaw Jackiewicz

  • Construction of high order diagonally implicit multistage integration methods for ordinary differential equations

    J. C. Butcher;Z. Jackiewicz

  • Construction of diagonally implicit general linear methods of type 1 and 2 for ordinary differential equations

    J. C. Butcher;Z. Jackiewicz

  • Asymptotic stability analysis of θ-methods for functional differential equations

    Zdzislaw Jackiewicz

  • Two-step Runge-Kutta methods

    Z. Jackiewicz;R. Renaut;A. Feldstein

  • Two-step almost collocation methods for Volterra integral equations

    Dajana Conte;Zdzislaw Jackiewicz;Beatrice Paternoster

  • ONE-STEP METHODS OF ANY ORDER FOR NEUTRAL FUNCTIONAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS.

    Zdzislaw Jackiewicz

  • Highly stable implicit-explicit Runge-Kutta methods

    Giuseppe Izzo;Zdzislaw Jackiewicz

  • Stability Analysis of Runge-Kutta Methods for Volterra Integral Equations of the Second Kind

    A. Bellen;Zdzislaw Jackiewicz;R. Vermiglio;M. Zennaro

  • Extrapolation-based implicit-explicit general linear methods

    Angelamaria Cardone;Zdzislaw Jackiewicz;Adrian Sandu;Hong Zhang

  • Contractivity of waveform relaxation Runge-Kutta iterations and related limit methods for dissipative systems in the maximum norm

    A. Bellen;Z. Jackiewicz;M. Zennaro

  • Nordsieck representation of DIMSIMs

    John C. Butcher;Philippe Chartier;Zdzislaw Jackiewicz

  • Quasilinear multistep methods and variable step predictor-corrector methods for neutral functional differential equations

    Zdzislaw Jackiewicz

  • A nonlinear optimization approach to the construction of general linear methods of high order

    J. C. Butcher;Z. Jackiewicz;H. D. Mittelmann

  • Variable stepsize continuous two-step Runge-Kutta methods for ordinary differential equations

    Zdzislaw Jackiewicz;S. Tracogna

  • Extrapolation-based implicit-explicit general linear methods

    Angelamaria Cardone;Zdzislaw Jackiewicz;Hong Zhang;Adrian Sandu

Frequent Co-Authors

John C. Butcher
John C. Butcher University of Auckland
Kevin Burrage
Kevin Burrage Queensland University of Technology
Adrian Sandu
Adrian Sandu Virginia Tech
Horst R. Thieme
Horst R. Thieme Arizona State University
Rainald Löhner
Rainald Löhner George Mason University
Anjan Bose
Anjan Bose Washington State University
Neville J. Ford
Neville J. Ford University of Chester

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Mathematics in the USA opens doors to various online degrees that complement analytical skills and boost career prospects. Many students consider pursuing an MBA to enhance their leadership and business acumen. Programs like those listed under mba transfer credits make it easier to continue education without losing previous coursework.

For those interested in data-driven fields, a data analytics master's degree offers advanced training in interpreting complex datasets, an increasingly vital skill in today's job market. Mathematics graduates can leverage these programs to transition into high-demand roles.

If time or admission criteria are concerns, exploring the easiest mba specialization could be a practical option. These programs typically offer flexible formats and less rigorous entry requirements, making them accessible to a wider audience.

Additionally, many prefer pursuing the easiest online mba programs, which combine convenience with career advancement. Together, these pathways provide diverse opportunities to enhance a mathematics background with in-demand skills and qualifications.

Best Scientists Citing Zdzislaw Jackiewicz

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles