World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
39
Citations
5061
World Ranking
8430
National Ranking
634

David Gilvear publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Gilvear sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 116 publications — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

David Gilvear D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Gilvear sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

David Gilvear is affiliated with Plymouth University in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science with specific attention to agricultural and biological sciences. The scientist has contributed extensively across several subfields including global and planetary change, ecology, soil science, nature and landscape conservation, and water science and technology.

The primary topics covered in their work encompass hydrology and sediment transport processes, fish ecology and management studies, soil erosion and sediment transport, land use and ecosystem services, conservation, biodiversity, and resource management, hydrology and watershed management studies, as well as rangeland management and livestock ecology.

David Gilvear has published regularly in a variety of academic journals. Frequent publication venues include:

  • River Research and Applications
  • Earth Surface Processes and Landforms
  • Water
  • The Science of The Total Environment
  • People and Nature

Recent published papers include:

  • "Determining tributary sources of increased sedimentation in East-African Rift Lakes", 2020, The Science of The Total Environment
  • "Ecosystem services of temporary streams differ between wet and dry phases in regions with contrasting climates and economies", 2020, People and Nature
  • "Best Practices for Monitoring and Assessing the Ecological Response to River Restoration", 2021, Water
  • "Integrating land-water-people connectivity concepts across disciplines for co-design of soil erosion solutions", 2020, Land Degradation and Development
  • "Building Climate Change Adaptation and Resilience through Soil Organic Carbon Restoration in Sub-Saharan Rural Communities: Challenges and Opportunities", 2021, Sustainability

Collaborations feature several frequent co-authors, indicating active multidisciplinary partnerships. Notable co-authors include:

  • Maarten Wynants
  • Aloyce Patrick
  • Linus K. Munishi
  • Kelvin Mtei
  • William Blake

Best Publications

  • Quantification of channel bed morphology in gravel-bed rivers using airborne multispectral imagery and aerial photography

    Sandra J. Winterbottom;David J. Gilvear

  • River rehabilitation for the delivery of multiple ecosystem services at the river network scale.

    David J Gilvear;Chris J Spray;Roser Casas-Mulet

  • Mapping intertidal estuarine sediment grain size distributions through airborne remote sensing

    Michael P Rainey;Andrew Tyler;David Gilvear;Robert G Bryant

  • The spatial dynamics of vertical migration by Microcystis aeruginosa in a eutrophic shallow lake: A case study using high spatial resolution time-series airborne remote sensing

    Peter Hunter;Andrew Tyler;Nigel Willby;David Gilvear

  • James R. Karr and Ellen W. Chu, Restoring Life in Running Waters: Better Biological Monitoring

    David Gilvear

  • Fluvial geomorphology and river engineering: future roles utilizing a fluvial hydrosystems framework

    David J Gilvear

  • Quantifying geomorphic and riparian land cover changes either side of a large flood event using airborne remote sensing: River Tay, Scotland

    Robert G Bryant;David J Gilvear

  • Character of channel planform change and meander development: Luangwa River, Zambia

    David Gilvear;Sandra Winterbottom;Henry Sichingabula

  • Analysis of Aerial Photography and Other Remotely Sensed Data

    David Gilvear;Robert Bryant

  • Hydrology and the ecological quality of Scottish river ecosystems

    D. J. Gilvear;Katherine Heal;A. Stephen

  • Using Remote Sensing to Aid the Assessment of Human Health Risks from Blooms of Potentially Toxic Cyanobacteria

    Peter D. Hunter;Andrew N. Tyler;David J. Gilvear;Nigel J. Willby

  • Quantification of the water balance and hydrogeological processes in the vicinity of a small groundwater-fed wetland, East Anglia, UK

    D.J. Gilvear;R. Andrews;J.H. Tellam;J.W. Lloyd

  • Drivers of increased soil erosion in East Africa’s agro-pastoral systems: changing interactions between the social, economic and natural domains

    Maarten Wynants;Claire Kelly;Kelvin Mtei;Linus Munishi

  • A GIS‐based approach to mapping probabilities of river bank erosion: regulated River Tummel, Scotland

    Sandra J. Winterbottom;David J. Gilvear

  • The influence of surface and interstitial moisture on the spectral characteristics of intertidal sediments: Implications for airborne image acquisition and processing

    M. P. Rainey;A. N. Tyler;R. G. Bryant;D. J. Gilvear

  • Mapping macrophytic vegetation in shallow lakes using the Compact Airborne Spectrographic Imager (CASI)

    Peter Hunter;David Gilvear;Andrew Tyler;Nigel Willby

  • Investigating a major assumption of predictive instream habitat models: is water velocity preference of juvenile Atlantic salmon independent of discharge?

    C. F. Holm;J. D. Armstrong;D. J. Gilvear

  • River restoration in the UK: Meeting the dual needs of the European union water framework directive and flood defence?

    Geraldene Wharton;David J. Gilvear

  • The use of remotely sensed data to detect channel hydromorphology; River Tummel, Scotland

    David J. Gilvear;Corine Davids;Andrew N. Tyler

  • Turbidity and suspended solids variations downstream of a regulating reservoir

    D.J. Gilvear;Geoffrey E. Petts

  • Image analysis of aerial photography to quantify changes in channel morphology and instream habitat following placer mining in interior Alaska

    David J. Gilvear;Tertia M. Waters;Alexander M. Milner

Frequent Co-Authors

William H. Blake
William H. Blake Plymouth University
Nigel J. Willby
Nigel J. Willby University of Stirling
Patrick A. Ndakidemi
Patrick A. Ndakidemi Agriculture Department of Natural Resources and Environment Tasmania
Pascal Boeckx
Pascal Boeckx Ghent University
John D. Armstrong
John D. Armstrong Marine Scotland
Robert G. Bryant
Robert G. Bryant University of Sheffield
Paul J. Wood
Paul J. Wood Loughborough University
Martin C. Thoms
Martin C. Thoms University of New England
Neil Roberts
Neil Roberts Plymouth University
G.E. Millward
G.E. Millward Plymouth University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students exploring options beyond traditional Environmental Sciences, there’s a range of related online degrees that can complement their career goals. For example, those interested in social impact and policy might consider dsw online programs, which focus on advanced social work skills useful in environmental justice roles.

Students seeking flexible and affordable education paths may look into the cheapest online general studies degree programs. These programs provide a broad-based education that can be tailored with environmental electives, allowing for interdisciplinary career opportunities.

If ease of completion is a priority, several options rank among the what's the easiest bachelor's degree to get. While these degrees may require less intensive technical coursework, they can still provide valuable foundational knowledge relevant to environmental fields.

Additionally, for those looking at a scientific focus closely related to environmental studies, an online geology degree offers specialized training in earth sciences. This pathway is ideal for careers involving natural resource management, conservation, and environmental consulting.

Best Scientists Citing David Gilvear

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles