World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Chemistry

D-Index
40
Citations
4183
World Ranking
17933
National Ranking
978

Eva M. Krupp publications per year

1989: 1 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 1 publications 1999: 1 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 1 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 1 publications 2005: 1 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 1 publications 2008: 1 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 15 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 0 publications 2025: 4 publications
1989 2025

114 publications in total across all disciplines

Eva M. Krupp publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eva M. Krupp sits on this spectrum.

61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 105 publications — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

Eva M. Krupp D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eva M. Krupp sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

Overview

Eva M. Krupp is affiliated with the University of Aberdeen in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily centers on environmental science with a strong focus on health, toxicology, and mutagenesis. The scientist's work spans several subfields, including pollution, analytical chemistry, environmental chemistry, and ecology.

Key topics addressed in their research include:

  • Mercury impact and mitigation studies
  • Heavy metals in environment
  • Toxic organic pollutants impact
  • Environmental toxicology and ecotoxicology
  • Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
  • Petroleum processing and analysis

Eva M. Krupp has contributed to multiple scientific papers, some of the more recent ones include:

  • "EOF and target PFAS analysis in surface waters affected by sewage treatment effluents in Berlin, Germany," 2023, published in Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry
  • "Characterisation of selenium and tellurium nanoparticles produced by Aureobasidium pullulans using a multi-method approach," 2021, published in Journal of Chromatography A
  • "Impact of soil-type, soil-pH, and soil-metal (loids) on grain-As and Cd accumulation in Malawian rice grown in three regions of Malawi," 2021, published in Environmental Advances
  • "Development of Mercury Analysis by NanoSIMS for the Localization of Mercury-Selenium Particles in Whale Liver," 2021, published in Analytical Chemistry
  • "The use of microwave-induced plasma optical emission spectrometry for fluorine determination and its application to tea infusions," 2021, published in Talanta

Frequent publication venues for their work show a range of journals and electronic platforms, including:

  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • The Science of The Total Environment
  • Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry
  • Journal of Chromatography A
  • Environmental Advances

Collaborations are a consistent feature in their career, with frequent co-authors identifying multiple joint publications. Notable collaborators include:

  • Jörg Feldmann
  • Andrea Raab
  • Shaun T. Lancaster
  • Abdullah Akhdhar
  • Gareth J. Norton

Best Publications

  • Critical review or scientific opinion paper: Arsenosugars—a class of benign arsenic species or justification for developing partly speciated arsenic fractionation in foodstuffs?

    Jörg Feldmann;Eva M. Krupp

  • Field fluxes and speciation of arsines emanating from soils

    Adrien Mestrot;Joerg Feldmann;Eva M Krupp;Mahmud S Hossain

  • Identification and Quantification of Arsenolipids Using Reversed-Phase HPLC Coupled Simultaneously to High-Resolution ICPMS and High-Resolution Electrospray MS without Species-Specific Standards

    Kenneth O. Amayo;Asta Petursdottir;Chris Newcombe;Helga Gunnlaugsdottir

  • Quantitative and qualitative trapping of arsines deployed to assess loss of volatile arsenic from paddy soil

    Adrien Mestrot;M Kalle Uroic;Thomas Plantevin;Rafiqul Islam

  • Metal(loid)organic compounds in geothermal gases and waters

    Alfred V Hirner;Jörg Feldmann;Jörg Feldmann;Eva Krupp;Rainer Grümping

  • Investigation into mercury bound to biothiols: structural identification using ESI–ion-trap MS and introduction of a method for their HPLC separation with simultaneous detection by ICP-MS and ESI-MS

    Eva Maria Krupp;B. F. Milne;Adrien Mestrot;Andrew Alexander Meharg

  • Speciation without Chromatography Using Selective Hydride Generation: Inorganic Arsenic in Rice and Samples of Marine Origin

    Stanislav Musil;Ásta H. Pétursdóttir;Andrea Raab;Helga Gunnlaugsdóttir

  • Application of isotopically labeled methylmercury for isotope dilution analysis of biological samples using gas chromatography/ICPMS.

    R. C. Rodriguez Martin-Doimeadios;E. Krupp;D. Amouroux;O. F. X. Donard

  • High resolution sector field ICP-MS and multicollector ICP-MS as tools for trace metal speciation in environmental studies: a review

    Mariella Moldovan;Eva M. Krupp;Alison E. Holliday;Olivier F. X. Donard

  • The molecular form of mercury in biota: identification of novel mercury peptide complexes in plants

    E M Krupp;A Mestrot;J Wielgus;A A Meharg

  • In vivo formation of natural HgSe nanoparticles in the liver and brain of pilot whales

    Zuzana Gajdosechova;Mohammed M. Lawan;Dagmar S. Urgast;Andrea Raab

  • Speciation of metals and metalloids in sediments with LTGC/ICP-MS.

    Eva Maria Krupp;R Grumping;U R R Furchtbar;A V Hirner

  • Using speciated isotope dilution with GC-inductively coupled plasma MS to determine and unravel the artificial formation of monomethylmercury in certified reference sediments.

    R.C. Rodríguez Martin-Doimeadios;Mathilde Monperrus;E. Krupp;David Amouroux

  • Volatile Metal Species in Coal Combustion Flue Gas

    † Marie-Pierre Pavageau;Christophe Pécheyran;Eva M. Krupp;and Anne Morin

  • Novel identification of arsenolipids using chemical derivatizations in conjunction with RP-HPLC-ICPMS/ESMS.

    Kenneth O. Amayo;Kenneth O. Amayo;Andrea Raab;Eva M. Krupp;Eva M. Krupp;Helga Gunnlaugsdottir

  • Atmospheric stability of arsines and the determination of their oxidative products in atmospheric aerosols (PM10): evidence of the widespread phenomena of biovolatilization of arsenic

    Ronit Jakob;Anja Roth;Karsten Haas;Eva M. Krupp

  • Comparison of gas chromatographic hyphenated techniques for mercury speciation analysis.

    J.J. Berzas Nevado;R.C. Rodríguez Martín-Doimeadios;E.M. Krupp;F.J. Guzmán Bernardo

  • Fluorine speciation analysis using reverse phase liquid chromatography coupled off-line to continuum source molecular absorption spectrometry (CS-MAS): identification and quantification of novel fluorinated organic compounds in environmental and biological samples.

    Zhiwei Qin;David McNee;Heike Gleisner;Andrea Raab

  • Potential and limits of speciated isotope-dilution analysis for metrology and assessing environmental reactivity

    M Monperrus;E Krupp;D Amouroux;O.F.X Donard

  • Identification of arsenolipids and their degradation products in cod-liver oil.

    Kenneth O Amayo;Andrea Raab;Eva M Krupp;Eva M Krupp;Jörg Feldmann

  • Isotope ratios on transient signals with GC–MC–ICP-MS

    Eva M. Krupp;Olivier F.X. Donard

  • Micro-scale preparation and characterization of isotopically enriched monomethylmercury

    R.C. Rodríguez Martín-Doimeadios;T. Stoichev;E. Krupp;David Amouroux

  • Novel non-target analysis of fluorine compounds using ICPMS/MS and HPLC-ICPMS/MS

    N. Laili A. Jamari;J. Frederik Dohmann;Andrea Raab;Eva M. Krupp

  • Novel non-targeted analysis of perfluorinated compounds using fluorine-specific detection regardless of their ionisability (HPLC-ICPMS/MS-ESI-MS).

    Nor Laili Azua Jamari;Jan Frederik Dohmann;Andrea Raab;Eva M. Krupp

Frequent Co-Authors

Jörg Feldmann
Jörg Feldmann University of Aberdeen
Andrea Raab
Andrea Raab International Committee of the Red Cross
Olivier F. X. Donard
Olivier F. X. Donard University of Pau and the Adour Region
David Amouroux
David Amouroux University of Pau and the Adour Region
Andrew A. Meharg
Andrew A. Meharg Queen's University Belfast
Enzo Lombi
Enzo Lombi University of South Australia
Kirk G. Scheckel
Kirk G. Scheckel Environmental Protection Agency
William R. Cullen
William R. Cullen University of British Columbia
Ian D L Foster
Ian D L Foster Rhodes University
Heidelore Fiedler
Heidelore Fiedler Örebro University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Chemistry in the USA opens doors to a variety of career options beyond traditional laboratory roles. For instance, some students choose to complement their chemistry background with a paralegal degree to work on patent law or regulatory affairs related to chemical products.

Pharmaceutical careers are also a natural fit. Those interested in sales might explore how much do drug reps make and what skills lead to success in this competitive field. Alternatively, if you’re wondering how long does it take to become a pharmacist, note that this pathway requires additional schooling and licensure but offers rewarding career stability in healthcare.

For students fascinated by forensic applications, becoming an autopsy technician is another option. Knowing the autopsy technician salary and job outlook can help guide educational decisions and career planning.

Exploring these related online degrees and career pathways can provide valuable context and alternative directions for Chemistry graduates looking to maximize their education and career potential.

Best Scientists Citing Eva M. Krupp

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles