World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
79
Citations
22153
World Ranking
17590
National Ranking
8794

Nicholas L. Tilney publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nicholas L. Tilney sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 413 publications — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Nicholas L. Tilney D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nicholas L. Tilney sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 79 D-Index — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Nicholas L. Tilney is affiliated with Brigham and Women's Hospital in the United States. This association situates them within a prominent medical and research institution. Their work is primarily rooted in clinical and biomedical contexts, given the nature of the hospital's focus.

There is no listed information regarding recent papers, co-authors, or publication venues linked to Nicholas L. Tilney in the provided data. This absence limits detailed insight into the scope or impact of their published research.

Similarly, there are no specified main fields of study, subfields, or primary research topics available. The lack of these details means it is not possible to outline areas of scientific inquiry or specialization they may have contributed to.

No awards or recognitions have been documented for this individual, and there is no record of book publications or significant collaborations. These elements often help contextualize a scientific career but are not present here.

Overall, Nicholas L. Tilney is identified by name and institutional affiliation only, with no additional publicly available bibliometric or academic profiling data. They are currently living, with no indication of having passed away.

Best Publications

  • Cyclosporine: a new immunosuppressive agent for organ transplantation.

    David J. Cohen;Rolf Loertscher;Mario F. Rubin;Nicholas L. Tilney

  • VASCULAR ACCESS FOR HEMODIALYSIS. PATENCY RATES AND RESULTS OF REVISION

    S B Palder;R L Kirkman;A D Whittemore;R M Hakim

  • Use of Cytomegalovirus Immune Globulin to Prevent Cytomegalovirus Disease in Renal-Transplant Recipients

    Snydman Dr;Werner Bg;Heinze-Lacey B;Berardi Vp

  • The cytokine-adhesion molecule cascade in ischemia/reperfusion injury of the rat kidney. Inhibition by a soluble P-selectin ligand.

    M Takada;K C Nadeau;G D Shaw;K A Marquette

  • Both alloantigen-dependent and -independent factors influence chronic allograft rejection.

    Stefan G. Tullius;Nicholas L. Tilney

  • Effects of explosive brain death on cytokine activation of peripheral organs in the rat.

    Moriatsu Takada;Kari C. Nadeau;Wayne W. Hancock;Harald S. Mackenzie

  • Brain death and its influence on donor organ quality and outcome after transplantation.

    J. Pratschke;M. J. Wilhelm;M. Kusaka;M. Basker

  • The case for allowing kidney sales

    J Radcliffe-Richards;AS Daar;RD Guttmann;R Hoffenberg

  • Chronic rejection--an undefined conundrum.

    Tilney Nl;Whitley Wd;Kupiec-Weglinski Jw

  • Sequential system failure after rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysms: an unsolved problem in postoperative care.

    Nicholas L. Tilney;George L. Bailey;Alfred P. Morgan

  • Immunologic tolerance to renal allografts after bone marrow transplants from the same donors

    Mohamed H. Sayegh;Neil A. Fine;John L. Smith;Helmut G. Rennke

  • Interferon-gamma deficiency prevents coronary arteriosclerosis but not myocardial rejection in transplanted mouse hearts.

    H Nagano;Richard Neal Mitchell;M K Taylor;S Hasegawa

  • Natural History of Major Venous Thrombosis of the Upper Extremity

    Nicholas L. Tilney;Henry J. G. Griffiths;Edward A. Edwards

  • Effects of initial ischemia/reperfusion injury on the transplanted kidney.

    Nicholas L. Tilney;Ronald D. Guttmann

  • Five years' experience in renal transplantation with immunosuppressive drugs: survival, function, complications, and the role of lymphocyte depletion by thoracic duct fistula.

    J E Murray;R E Wilson;N L Tilney;J P Merrill

  • Cytokines, adhesion molecules, and the pathogenesis of chronic rejection of rat renal allografts.

    Wayne Hancock;W. Whitley;Stefan Tullius;Uwe Heemann

  • The role of the B7 costimulatory pathway in experimental cold ischemia/reperfusion injury.

    Moriatsu Takada;Anil Chandraker;Kari C. Nadeau;Mohamed H. Sayegh

  • Sequential cytokine dynamics in chronic rejection of rat renal allografts: roles for cytokines RANTES and MCP-1

    Kari C. Nadeau;Haruhito Azuma;Nicholas L. Tilney

  • Activation of inflammatory mediators in rat renal isografts by donor brain death.

    Mamoru Kusaka;Johann Pratschke;Markus J. Wilhelm;Farzard Ziai

  • Accelerated Rejection of Renal Allografts From Brain-Dead Donors

    Johann Pratschke;Markus J. Wilhelm;Mamoru Kusaka;Francisca Beato

Frequent Co-Authors

Jerzy W. Kupiec-Weglinski
Jerzy W. Kupiec-Weglinski University of California, Los Angeles
Wayne W. Hancock
Wayne W. Hancock University of Pennsylvania
Terry B. Strom
Terry B. Strom Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Stefan G. Tullius
Stefan G. Tullius Brigham and Women's Hospital
Charles B. Carpenter
Charles B. Carpenter Brigham and Women's Hospital
Kari C. Nadeau
Kari C. Nadeau Harvard University
Mohamed H. Sayegh
Mohamed H. Sayegh American University of Beirut
William M. Baldwin
William M. Baldwin Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine
Tibor Diamantstein
Tibor Diamantstein Freie Universität Berlin
Barry M. Brenner
Barry M. Brenner Brigham and Women's Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a medical career in the USA doesn’t always require a traditional MD route. Many students are exploring alternative healthcare degrees that offer flexibility, shorter completion times, and diverse career options. Online nursing programs, for instance, provide accelerated pathways into the healthcare workforce.

One popular option is the shortest online dnp program, designed for registered nurses aiming for advanced practice and leadership roles with the convenience of online learning. For those prioritizing ease and efficiency, the shortest dnp program options reduce both the duration and intensity of study.

Entry-level nurses can benefit from lpn online programs, which allow students to quickly start working in practical nursing positions. Meanwhile, specialized fields like mental health are accessible through accelerated msn psychiatric np programs, ideal for those seeking advanced psychiatric care roles.

These online pathways provide flexible, career-driven alternatives for students interested in the healthcare sector, making it easier to tailor education to personal schedules and career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Nicholas L. Tilney

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles