World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Immunology 69 2497 19 406 18904
Medicine 72 19804 230 427 21026

Pekka Häyry publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Pekka Häyry between 1965 and 2010, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Pekka Häyry published across 46 years, from 1965 to 2010, averaging 9.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 25 publications in 1992. 8 of the 430 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1965 to 2010. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 25. Peak 25 publications in 1992. 1965: 1 publication 1966: 0 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 1 publication 1969: 0 publications 1970: 3 publications 1971: 2 publications 1972: 6 publications 1973: 6 publications 1974: 4 publications 1975: 5 publications 1976: 12 publications 1977: 6 publications 1978: 14 publications 1979: 16 publications 1980: 11 publications 1981: 16 publications 1982: 11 publications 1983: 9 publications 1984: 12 publications 1985: 9 publications 1986: 6 publications 1987: 13 publications 1988: 12 publications 1989: 17 publications 1990: 21 publications 1991: 14 publications 1992: 25 publications 1993: 21 publications 1994: 25 publications 1995: 16 publications 1996: 22 publications 1997: 13 publications 1998: 6 publications 1999: 15 publications 2000: 8 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 8 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 11 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 1 publication
1965 2010

430 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Pekka Häyry: publications per year, 1965 to 2010
Year Publications
1965 1
1966 0
1967 0
1968 1
1969 0
1970 3
1971 2
1972 6
1973 6
1974 4
1975 5
1976 12
1977 6
1978 14
1979 16
1980 11
1981 16
1982 11
1983 9
1984 12
1985 9
1986 6
1987 13
1988 12
1989 17
1990 21
1991 14
1992 25
1993 21
1994 25
1995 16
1996 22
1997 13
1998 6
1999 15
2000 8
2001 7
2002 8
2003 5
2004 11
2005 4
2006 5
2007 2
2008 2
2009 7
2010 1
Total 430
Download as CSV

Pekka Häyry publication distribution in Immunology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Immunology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pekka Häyry sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 76 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 62–71 to 807+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 189. Most scientists, 189, have 152–161 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 807 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 402–411 publications, is where this scientist sits. 62–71 publications: 9 scientists 72–81 publications: 23 scientists 82–91 publications: 40 scientists 92–101 publications: 72 scientists 102–111 publications: 86 scientists 112–121 publications: 108 scientists 122–131 publications: 150 scientists 132–141 publications: 160 scientists 142–151 publications: 159 scientists 152–161 publications: 189 scientists 162–171 publications: 166 scientists 172–181 publications: 181 scientists 182–191 publications: 188 scientists 192–201 publications: 187 scientists 202–211 publications: 178 scientists 212–221 publications: 158 scientists 222–231 publications: 168 scientists 232–241 publications: 159 scientists 242–251 publications: 160 scientists 252–261 publications: 148 scientists 262–271 publications: 116 scientists 272–281 publications: 125 scientists 282–291 publications: 115 scientists 292–301 publications: 111 scientists 302–311 publications: 95 scientists 312–321 publications: 97 scientists 322–331 publications: 97 scientists 332–341 publications: 99 scientists 342–351 publications: 96 scientists 352–361 publications: 69 scientists 362–371 publications: 76 scientists 372–381 publications: 71 scientists 382–391 publications: 71 scientists 392–401 publications: 62 scientists 402–411 publications: 54 scientists 412–421 publications: 41 scientists 422–431 publications: 63 scientists 432–441 publications: 53 scientists 442–451 publications: 31 scientists 452–461 publications: 42 scientists 462–471 publications: 40 scientists 472–481 publications: 29 scientists 482–491 publications: 34 scientists 492–501 publications: 30 scientists 502–511 publications: 23 scientists 512–521 publications: 41 scientists 522–531 publications: 29 scientists 532–541 publications: 28 scientists 542–551 publications: 16 scientists 552–561 publications: 18 scientists 562–571 publications: 18 scientists 572–581 publications: 17 scientists 582–591 publications: 17 scientists 592–601 publications: 17 scientists 602–611 publications: 19 scientists 612–621 publications: 13 scientists 622–631 publications: 12 scientists 632–641 publications: 11 scientists 642–651 publications: 16 scientists 652–661 publications: 9 scientists 662–671 publications: 5 scientists 672–681 publications: 13 scientists 682–691 publications: 12 scientists 692–701 publications: 6 scientists 702–711 publications: 6 scientists 712–721 publications: 9 scientists 722–731 publications: 9 scientists 732–741 publications: 6 scientists 742–751 publications: 11 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 7 scientists 772–781 publications: 12 scientists 782–791 publications: 7 scientists 792–801 publications: 5 scientists 802–806 publications: 1 scientist 807+ publications: 100 scientists
62–71 publications 807+

This scientist: 406 publications — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 807 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Immunology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,929 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
62–71 9
72–81 23
82–91 40
92–101 72
102–111 86
112–121 108
122–131 150
132–141 160
142–151 159
152–161 189
162–171 166
172–181 181
182–191 188
192–201 187
202–211 178
212–221 158
222–231 168
232–241 159
242–251 160
252–261 148
262–271 116
272–281 125
282–291 115
292–301 111
302–311 95
312–321 97
322–331 97
332–341 99
342–351 96
352–361 69
362–371 76
372–381 71
382–391 71
392–401 62
402–411 54 406
412–421 41
422–431 63
432–441 53
442–451 31
452–461 42
462–471 40
472–481 29
482–491 34
492–501 30
502–511 23
512–521 41
522–531 29
532–541 28
542–551 16
552–561 18
562–571 18
572–581 17
582–591 17
592–601 17
602–611 19
612–621 13
622–631 12
632–641 11
642–651 16
652–661 9
662–671 5
672–681 13
682–691 12
692–701 6
702–711 6
712–721 9
722–731 9
732–741 6
742–751 11
752–761 10
762–771 7
772–781 12
782–791 7
792–801 5
802–806 1
807+ 100
Download as CSV

Pekka Häyry D-index placement in Immunology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Immunology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pekka Häyry sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200
Bar chart with 60 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 157+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 201. Most scientists, 201, have 58–59 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 157 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 68–69 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 28 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 91 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 157 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 192 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 175 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 188 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 177 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 155 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 194 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 201 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 197 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 201 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 173 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 167 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 172 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 199 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 184 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 133 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 163 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 125 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 121 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 102 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 96 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 75 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 74 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 66 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 68 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 60 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 54 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 36 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 23 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 52 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 41 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 34 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 25 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 28 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 11 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 19 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 20 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 17 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 14 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 15 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 9 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 11 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 9 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 7 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 7 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 5 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156 D-Index: 6 scientists 157+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40–41 D-Index 157+

This scientist: 69 D-Index — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 157 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Immunology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,929 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 28
42–43 91
44–45 157
46–47 192
48–49 175
50–51 188
52–53 177
54–55 155
56–57 194
58–59 201
60–61 197
62–63 201
64–65 173
66–67 167
68–69 172 69
70–71 199
72–73 184
74–75 133
76–77 163
78–79 127
80–81 121
82–83 125
84–85 121
86–87 102
88–89 96
90–91 75
92–93 72
94–95 74
96–97 66
98–99 68
100–101 49
102–103 60
104–105 54
106–107 36
108–109 23
110–111 52
112–113 41
114–115 34
116–117 25
118–119 28
120–121 11
122–123 20
124–125 27
126–127 19
128–129 20
130–131 16
132–133 17
134–135 14
136–137 15
138–139 9
140–141 11
142–143 9
144–145 9
146–147 7
148–149 7
150–151 7
152–153 5
154–155 8
156 6
157+ 96
Download as CSV

Overview

Pekka Häyry was affiliated with the University of Helsinki in Finland during their academic career. The available data indicates a focus on research activities primarily connected with this institution.

There are no specific recent papers available to detail, although the record acknowledges a scholarly output without listing titles, years, or venues. Similarly, frequently collaborating co-authors have not been specified, thus no information on academic partnerships is provided.

Details regarding publication venues are also absent, leaving the exact forums for their scholarly communication unknown. The same applies to book publications, with no records on either publishers or titles attributed to their authorship.

The fields of study and subfields connected to Häyry's research are not recorded, and there is no data on the main topics covered in their work. Consequently, the thematic and disciplinary focuses of their scholarship cannot be outlined precisely.

Information about awards received by Pekka Häyry is not documented, including the years or contexts of any recognition, which limits insights into formal acknowledgments or honors they may have attained.

Overall, Pekka Häyry's professional background involves an academic presence linked to a notable Finnish university. The absence of specific data on publications, collaborators, research topics, and honors restricts the scope of this overview to fundamental affiliation details and basic professional status.

Best Publications

  • International standardization of criteria for the histologic diagnosis of renal allograft rejection : the Banff working classification of kidney transplant pathology

    K.i.m. Solez;Roy A. Axelsen;Hallgrimur Benediktsson;James F. Burdick

  • Antibody-mediated rejection criteria - an addition to the Banff 97 classification of renal allograft rejection.

    Lorraine C. Racusen;Robert B. Colvin;Kim Solez;Michael J. Mihatsch

  • A blinded, randomized clinical trial of mycophenolate mofetil for the prevention of acute rejection in cadaveric renal transplantation

    Paul Keown;Pekka Häyry;Peter Morris;Calvin Stiller

  • The desmoid tumor. I. Incidence, sex-, age- and anatomical distribution in the Finnish population

    Jyrki J. Reitamo;Pekka Häyry;Erkki Nykyri;Erkki Saxen

  • PHASE-I CLINICAL TRIAL OF MONOCLONAL ANTIBODY IN TREATMENT OF GASTROINTESTINAL TUMOURS

    HenryF. Sears;Jeffrey Mattis;Dorothee Herlyn;Pekka Häyry

  • Vascular endothelial growth factor enhances cardiac allograft arteriosclerosis.

    Karl B. Lemström;Rainer Krebs;Antti I. Nykänen;Jussi M. Tikkanen

  • MORPHOLOGICAL AND FUNCTIONAL CHARACTERIZATION OF ISOLATED EFFECTOR-CELLS RESPONSIBLE FOR HUMAN NATURAL KILLER ACTIVITY TO FETAL FIBROBLASTS AND TO CULTURED-CELL LINE TARGETS

    E. Saksela;T. Timonen;Annamari Ranki;P. Hayry

  • Fractionation, morphological and functional characterization of effector cells responsible for human natural killer activity against cell-line targets

    Tuomo Timonen;Eero Saksela;Annamari Ranki;Pekka Häyry

  • Differentiation between vasculoprotective and uterotrophic effects of ligands with different binding affinities to estrogen receptors α and β

    Sari Mäkelä;Hanna Savolainen;Einari Aavik;Marjukka Myllärniemi

  • Histopathological findings in well-functioning, long-term renal allografts.

    Helena M. Isoniemi;Leena Krogerus;Eeva von Willebrand;Eero Taskinen

  • The desmoid tumor. II. Analysis of factors possibly contributing to the etiology and growth behavior.

    Pekka Häyry;Jyrki J. Reitamo;Saara Tötterman;Dorrit Hopfner-Hallikainen

  • Histological chronic allograft damage index accurately predicts chronic renal allograft rejection.

    Helena Isoniemi;Eero Taskinen;Pekka Häyry

  • CMV infection, class II antigen expression, and human kidney allograft rejection.

    Eeva von Willebrand;Erna Pettersson;Juhani Ahonen;Pekka Häyry

  • Chronic rejection in rat aortic allografts. An experimental model for transplant arteriosclerosis.

    A Mennander;S Tiisala;J Halttunen;S Yilmaz

  • Sirolimus-based therapy following early cyclosporine withdrawal provides significantly improved renal histology and function at 3 years.

    Alfredo Mota;Manuel Arias;Eero I Taskinen;Timo Paavonen;Timo Paavonen

  • Allograft response in vitro.

    Pekka Hayry;Leif C. Andersson;Stig Nordling;Martti Virolainen

  • Cytomegalovirus infection enhances smooth muscle cell proliferation and intimal thickening of rat aortic allografts.

    K B Lemström;J H Bruning;C A Bruggeman;I T Lautenschlager

  • Identification of resting human T and B lymphocytes by acid alpha-naphthyl acetate esterase staining combined with rosette formation with Staphylococcus aureus strain Cowan 1.

    A. Ranki;T. H. Tötterman;P. Häyry

  • Characterization of surface glycoproteins of mouse lymphoid cells.

    Carl C. Gahmberg;Pekka Häyry;Leif C. Andersson

  • Inhibition of platelet-derived growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibits vascular smooth muscle cell migration and proliferation.

    Marukka Myllärniemi;Lazaro Calderon;Karl Lemström;Elisabeth Buchdunger

Frequent Co-Authors

Irmeli Lautenschlager
Irmeli Lautenschlager University of Helsinki
Risto Renkonen
Risto Renkonen University of Helsinki
Leif C. Andersson
Leif C. Andersson University of Helsinki
Cathrien A. Bruggeman
Cathrien A. Bruggeman Maastricht University Medical Centre
Annamari Ranki
Annamari Ranki University of Helsinki
Markku S. Nieminen
Markku S. Nieminen University of Helsinki
Tapani Ruutu
Tapani Ruutu University of Helsinki
Yrjö T. Konttinen
Yrjö T. Konttinen Helsinki University Hospital
Philip F. Halloran
Philip F. Halloran University of Alberta
Veli-Pekka Lehto
Veli-Pekka Lehto University of Helsinki

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in immunology, expanding your education with related online nursing degrees can open diverse career pathways. Many professionals look to bridge programs to specialize further. For example, an fnp to acnp bridge program online allows Family Nurse Practitioners (FNPs) to transition into acute care roles, gaining advanced expertise that complements immunological research and patient care.

Accelerated study options also appeal to those eager to advance quickly. An accelerated fnp program offers an efficient pathway for registered nurses to become certified FNPs, equipping them with valuable clinical skills relevant to immune system-related health conditions.

For individuals starting without a nursing background, the best online bsn programs for non nurses provide foundational knowledge and credentials essential for entering healthcare fields that intersect with immunological science.

Understanding earning potential is crucial when planning your career. Reviewing insights on how much do dnps make can help you make informed decisions about advancing to a Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) degree, often linked to higher salaries and leadership roles in healthcare related to immunology.

Best Scientists Citing Pekka Häyry

Recently Published Articles