World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
39
Citations
4775
World Ranking
8454
National Ranking
637

Neil S. Arnold publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Neil S. Arnold sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 120 publications — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Neil S. Arnold D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Neil S. Arnold sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Neil S. Arnold is affiliated with the University of Cambridge in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the fields of Earth and Planetary Sciences as well as Physics and Astronomy, with a focus on Atmospheric Science and Astronomy and Astrophysics as subfields.

Their work covers several main topics including:

  • Cryospheric studies and observations
  • Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
  • Winter Sports Injuries and Performance
  • Planetary Science and Exploration
  • Landslides and related hazards
  • Climate change and permafrost
  • Astro and Planetary Science

Neil S. Arnold has published in several scientific venues, with frequent contributions to:

  • Icarus
  • Journal of Glaciology
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge)
  • The Cryosphere
  • Quaternary Science Reviews

Recent papers by Arnold include:

  • Lateral meltwater transfer across an Antarctic ice shelf, 2020, The Cryosphere
  • Supervised classification of slush and ponded water on Antarctic ice shelves using Landsat 8 imagery, 2021, Journal of Glaciology
  • Tunnel valley formation beneath deglaciating mid-latitude ice sheets: Observations and modelling, 2022, Quaternary Science Reviews
  • Over-winter persistence of supraglacial lakes on the Greenland Ice Sheet: results and insights from a new model, 2020, Journal of Glaciology
  • Remote Detection of Surge-Related Glacier Terminus Change across High Mountain Asia, 2021, Remote Sensing

The scientist has collaborated frequently with several coauthors, including:

  • Frances Butcher
  • Ian Willis
  • Alison F. Banwell
  • James D. Kirkham
  • Kelly Hogan

Best Publications

  • Morphometry of a glacier-linked esker in NW Tempe Terra, Mars, and implications for sediment-discharge dynamics of subglacial drainage

    Frances E. G. Butcher;Frances E. G. Butcher;Matthew R. Balme;Susan J. Conway;Colman Gallagher

  • A distributed surface energy-balance model for a small valley glacier. I. Development and testing for Haut Glacier d’ Arolla, Valais, Switzerland

    N.S. Arnold;I.C. Willis;M.J. Sharp;K.S. Richards

  • Topographic controls on the surface energy balance of a high Arctic valley glacier

    Neil S. Arnold;W. Gareth Rees;Andrew J. Hodson;Jack Kohler

  • Geometry, bed topography and drainage system structure of the Haut Glacier d'Arolla, Switzerland

    Martin Sharp;Keith Richards;Ian Willis;Neil Arnold

  • Changes in geometry and subglacial drainage of Midre Lovénbreen, Svalbard, determined from digital elevation models

    David Rippin;Ian Willis;Neil Arnold;Andrew Hodson

  • Effect of snowpack removal on energy balance, melt and runoff in a small supraglacial catchment

    Ian C. Willis;Neil S. Arnold;Ben W. Brock

  • Refined energy-balance modelling of a supraglacial pond, Langtang Khola, Nepal

    Evan S. Miles;Francesca Pellicciotti;Ian C. Willis;Jakob F. Steiner

  • Ice dynamic response to two modes of surface lake drainage on the Greenland ice sheet

    Marco Tedesco;Ian C Willis;Matthew J Hoffman;Alison F Banwell

  • Extent and Dynamics of the Scandinavian Ice Sheet during Oxygen Isotope Stage 3 (65,000–25,000 yr B.P.)☆

    Neil S. Arnold;Tjeerd H. van Andel;Vidar Valen

  • AN INTEGRATED APPROACH TO MODELLING HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY IN GLACIERIZED CATCHMENTS

    Keith Richards;Martin Sharp;Neil Arnold;Angela Gurnell

  • Initial results from a distributed, physically based model of glacier hydrology

    Neil Arnold;Keith Richards;Ian Willis;Martin Sharp

  • A spreadsheet-based (Microsoft Excel) point surface energy balance model for glacier and snow melt studies.

    Ben W. Brock;Neil S. Arnold

  • Modelling seasonal and spatial variations in the surface energy balance of Haut Glacier d’Arolla, Switzerland

    Ben W. Brock;Ian C. Willis;Martin J. Sharp;Neil S. Arnold

  • Modeling supraglacial water routing and lake filling on the Greenland Ice Sheet

    Alison F. Banwell;Neil S. Arnold;Ian C. Willis;Marco Tedesco

  • Flow variability in the Scandinavian ice sheet: modelling the coupling between ice sheet flow and hydrology

    Neil Arnold;Martin Sharp

  • Moulin density controls drainage development beneath the Greenland Ice Sheet

    Alison Banwell;Ian Hewitt;Ian Willis;Neil Arnold

  • Supraglacial lakes on the Larsen B ice shelf, Antarctica, and at Paakitsoq, West Greenland: a comparative study

    Alison F. Banwell;Martamaria Caballero;Neil S. Arnold;Neil F. Glasser

  • Spatial, seasonal and interannual variability of supraglacial ponds in the Langtang Valley of Nepal, 1999–2013

    Evan S. Miles;Ian C. Willis;Neil S. Arnold;Jakob Steiner

  • A new approach for dealing with depressions in digital elevation models when calculating flow accumulation values

    Neil Arnold

  • Evaluating the potential of high‐resolution airborne LiDAR data in glaciology

    N. S. Arnold;W. G. Rees;B. J. Devereux;G. S. Amable

  • Modeling subglacial water routing at Paakitsoq, W Greenland

    Alison F. Banwell;Ian C. Willis;Neil S. Arnold

  • Dual-satellite (Sentinel-2 and Landsat 8) remote sensing of supraglacial lakes in Greenland

    Andrew G. Williamson;Alison F. Banwell;Alison F. Banwell;Ian C. Willis;Ian C. Willis;Neil S. Arnold

  • A Fully Automated Supraglacial lake area and volume Tracking (“FAST”) algorithm: Development and application using MODIS imagery of West Greenland

    Andrew G. Williamson;Neil S. Arnold;Alison F. Banwell;Ian C. Willis

Frequent Co-Authors

Ian Willis
Ian Willis University of Cambridge
Susan J. Conway
Susan J. Conway University of Nantes
Matthew R. Balme
Matthew R. Balme The Open University
Stephen R. Lewis
Stephen R. Lewis The Open University
Evan S. Miles
Evan S. Miles Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research
Hamish D. Pritchard
Hamish D. Pritchard British Antarctic Survey
Julian A. Dowdeswell
Julian A. Dowdeswell University of Cambridge
Kelly A. Hogan
Kelly A. Hogan British Antarctic Survey
Robert D Larter
Robert D Larter British Antarctic Survey
Francesca Pellicciotti
Francesca Pellicciotti Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences opens doors to various interdisciplinary fields. For those fascinated by Earth's physical structure and processes, pursuing the best online geology degree programs offers critical knowledge in geoscience, essential for careers in natural resource management and environmental consulting.

Geospatial technology plays a pivotal role in environmental analysis. Students interested in mapping and data visualization can explore top-ranked best GIS programs in the US, which enhance skills in geographic information systems—a valuable asset in urban planning, conservation, and climate modeling.

For those aiming to influence environmental policy and administration, the easiest online MPA programs provide a pathway to leadership roles in government and non-profits by combining public administration expertise with environmental knowledge.

Complementing scientific study with social understanding is crucial. A bachelors degree in sociology online can help students grasp societal impacts on the environment, fostering holistic approaches to sustainability challenges.

Best Scientists Citing Neil S. Arnold

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles