World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Mohamed Athmane Yallese

Mohamed Athmane Yallese

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering 35 2645 2479 4 4 133 5147

Mohamed Athmane Yallese publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mohamed Athmane Yallese between 2002 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mohamed Athmane Yallese published across 25 years, from 2002 to 2026, averaging 5.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 2017. 13 of the 140 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2002 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 2017. 2002: 1 publication 2003: 1 publication 2004: 1 publication 2005: 1 publication 2006: 0 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 2 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 17 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 14 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 16 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 8 publications 2025: 12 publications 2026: 1 publication
2002 2026

140 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mohamed Athmane Yallese: publications per year, 2002 to 2026
Year Publications
2002 1
2003 1
2004 1
2005 1
2006 0
2007 4
2008 1
2009 2
2010 3
2011 2
2012 4
2013 4
2014 5
2015 5
2016 10
2017 17
2018 5
2019 14
2020 6
2021 8
2022 16
2023 9
2024 8
2025 12
2026 1
Total 140
Download as CSV

Mohamed Athmane Yallese publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mohamed Athmane Yallese sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 659+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 155. Most scientists, 155, have 147–156 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 127–136 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 659+

This scientist: 133 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 10
57–66 23
67–76 32
77–86 62
87–96 67
97–106 91
107–116 113
117–126 115
127–136 130 133
137–146 140
147–156 155
157–166 132
167–176 133
177–186 130
187–196 140
197–206 115
207–216 125
217–226 117
227–236 99
237–246 92
247–256 100
257–266 95
267–276 88
277–286 77
287–296 74
297–306 74
307–316 62
317–326 70
327–336 59
337–346 58
347–356 45
357–366 44
367–376 36
377–386 41
387–396 32
397–406 23
407–416 28
417–426 27
427–436 25
437–446 23
447–456 23
457–466 20
467–476 12
477–486 24
487–496 18
497–506 12
507–516 13
517–526 21
527–536 12
537–546 8
547–556 16
557–566 3
567–576 11
577–586 6
587–596 5
597–606 6
607–616 7
617–626 7
627–636 10
637–646 4
647–656 3
657–658 2
659+ 100
Download as CSV

Mohamed Athmane Yallese D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mohamed Athmane Yallese sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 93+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 189. Most scientists, 189, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 35 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 83
31 113
32 144
33 153
34 189
35 158 35
36 139
37 127
38 130
39 126
40 104
41 100
42 107
43 101
44 103
45 79
46 88
47 70
48 83
49 44
50 64
51 56
52 50
53 48
54 58
55 52
56 48
57 42
58 34
59 42
60 37
61 42
62 44
63 22
64 33
65 29
66 23
67 29
68 24
69 19
70 34
71 26
72 19
73 18
74 19
75 14
76 19
77 8
78 18
79 16
80 12
81 17
82 11
83 16
84 7
85 9
86 8
87 6
88 6
89 7
90 10
91 4
92 4
93+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Mohamed Athmane Yallese is affiliated with the University of Guelma in Algeria. Their research focuses primarily on the field of Engineering with extensive work in Mechanical Engineering, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Biomedical Engineering, and Materials Chemistry.

The main topics of their research include:

  • Advanced machining processes and optimization
  • Advanced Machining and Optimization Techniques
  • Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques
  • Manufacturing Process and Optimization
  • Engineering Technology and Methodologies
  • Metal Alloys Wear and Properties
  • Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes

Mohamed Athmane Yallese has contributed to numerous publications, with frequent papers appearing in the following venues:

  • The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology
  • Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part C Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science
  • Periodica Polytechnica Mechanical Engineering
  • Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering
  • Mechanika

Selected recent papers authored or co-authored by Yallese include:

  • Optimization of machining parameters in turning of Inconel 718 Nickel-base super alloy (2020), Mechanics & Industry
  • Modeling and optimization in turning of PA66-GF30% and PA66 using multi-criteria decision-making (PSI, MABAC, and MAIRCA) methods: a comparative study (2022), The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology
  • Machinability study and ANN-MOALO-based multi-response optimization during Eco-Friendly machining of EN-GJL-250 cast iron (2021), The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology
  • Tool wear, 3D surface topography, and comparative analysis of GRA, MOORA, DEAR, and WASPAS optimization techniques in turning of cold work tool steel (2022), The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology
  • Tool vibration, surface roughness, cutting power, and productivity assessment using RSM and GRA approach during machining of Inconel 718 with PVD-coated carbide tool (2022), The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology

Their collaborative work includes frequent partnerships with several co-authors, notably:

  • Salim Belhadi (30 joint publications)
  • Tarek Mabrouki (12 joint publications)
  • Salim Chihaoui (9 joint publications)
  • Khaoula Safi (9 joint publications)
  • Aissa Laouissi (8 joint publications)

Mohamed Athmane Yallese's research trajectory shows a strong emphasis on optimization techniques in machining processes and the study of advanced surface finishing methods. Their work often integrates decision-making methods and multi-response optimization approaches to address practical challenges in manufacturing environments.

Best Publications

  • Statistical analysis of surface roughness and cutting forces using response surface methodology in hard turning of AISI 52100 bearing steel with CBN tool

    Khaider Bouacha;Mohamed Athmane Yallese;Tarek Mabrouki;Jean-François Rigal

  • Analysis of surface roughness and cutting force components in hard turning with CBN tool: Prediction model and cutting conditions optimization

    Hamdi Aouici;Mohamed Athmane Yallese;Kamel Chaoui;Tarek Mabrouki

  • On the prediction of surface roughness in the hard turning based on cutting parameters and tool vibrations

    Zahia Hessainia;Ahmed Belbah;Mohamed Athmane Yallese;Tarek Mabrouki

  • Hard machining of hardened bearing steel using cubic boron nitride tool

    Mohamed Athmane Yallese;Kamel Chaoui;Nassereddine Zeghib;Lakhdar Boulanouar

  • Comparative assessment of wiper and conventional ceramic tools on surface roughness in hard turning AISI 4140 steel

    Mohamed Elbah;Mohamed Athmane Yallese;Hamdi Aouici;Tarek Mabrouki

  • Performance of coated and uncoated mixed ceramic tools in hard turning process

    Hamza Bensouilah;Hamdi Aouici;Ikhlas Meddour;Mohamed Athmane Yallese

  • Surface roughness and cutting forces modeling for optimization of machining condition in finish hard turning of AISI 52100 steel

    Mohamed Walid Azizi;Salim Belhadi;Mohamed Athmane Yallese;Tarek Mabrouki

  • Predictive modeling and multi-response optimization of technological parameters in turning of Polyoxymethylene polymer (POM C) using RSM and desirability function

    Amel Chabbi;Mohamed Athmane Yallese;Ikhlas Meddour;Mourad Nouioua

  • Machinability investigation in hard turning of AISI D3 cold work steel with ceramic tool using response surface methodology

    H. Aouici;H. Bouchelaghem;M. A. Yallese;M. Elbah

  • Analysis and optimization of hard turning operation using cubic boron nitride tool

    Khaider Bouacha;Mohamed Athmane Yallese;Samir Khamel;Salim Belhadi

  • Investigation and modeling of cutting forces and surface roughness when hard turning of AISI 52100 steel with mixed ceramic tool: cutting conditions optimization

    I. Meddour;M. A. Yallese;R. Khattabi;M. Elbah

  • Modeling and optimization of hard turning of X38CrMoV5-1 steel with CBN tool: Machining parameters effects on flank wear and surface roughness

    Hamdi Aouici;Mohamed Athmane Yallese;Brahim Fnides;Kamel Chaoui

  • Modeling and multi-objective optimization for minimizing surface roughness, cutting force, and power, and maximizing productivity for tempered stainless steel AISI 420 in turning operations

    Abderrahmen Zerti;Mohamed Athmane Yallese;Ikhlas Meddour;Salim Belhadi

  • Investigation, modeling, and optimization of cutting parameters in turning of gray cast iron using coated and uncoated silicon nitride ceramic tools. Based on ANN, RSM, and GA optimization

    Aissa Laouissi;M. A. Yallese;A. Belbah;S. Belhadi

  • EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION AND PERFORMANCE ANALYSES OF CBN INSERT IN HARD TURNING OF COLD WORK TOOL STEEL (D3)

    H. Bouchelaghem;M. A. Yallese;T. Mabrouki;A. Amirat

  • Investigation of the performance of the MQL, dry, and wet turning by response surface methodology (RSM) and artificial neural network (ANN)

    Mourad Nouioua;Mohamed Athmane Yallese;Riad Khettabi;Salim Belhadi

  • Mathematical modeling for turning on AISI 420 stainless steel using surface response methodology

    Lakhdar Bouzid;Mohamed Athmane Yallese;Kamel Chaoui;Tarek Mabrouki;Tarek Mabrouki

  • Application of response surface methodology for determining cutting force model in turning hardened AISI H11 hot work tool steel

    B. Fnides;M.A. Yallese;Tarek Mabrouki;Jean Francois Rigal

  • Design optimization for minimum technological parameters when dry turning of AISI D3 steel using Taguchi method

    Oussama Zerti;Mohamed Athmane Yallese;Riad Khettabi;Kamel Chaoui

  • Prediction of machining performance using RSM and ANN models in hard turning of martensitic stainless steel AISI 420

    Abderrahmen Zerti;Mohamed Athmane Yallese;Oussama Zerti;Mourad Nouioua

Frequent Co-Authors

Tarek Mabrouki
Tarek Mabrouki Tunis El Manar University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring related online degrees can provide valuable insights for students interested in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering. Just as some individuals weigh options among different therapy degrees, engineering students might consider complementary fields such as materials science, robotics, or systems engineering to broaden their expertise and career prospects.

When selecting an online degree program, understanding which paths might be more accessible is crucial. Research into which counseling degree is easiest highlights the importance of matching program rigor with personal strengths and schedules—a concept equally relevant to engineering students seeking a manageable yet comprehensive curriculum.

Accelerated pathways, like the bcba accelerated program, reflect growing trends in higher education. Engineering students should explore similar fast-track master's or certificate programs that can enhance their skills and employment opportunities without extended time commitments.

Admission competitiveness also plays a role. Much like the detailed insights into speech pathology grad school acceptance rates, prospective engineering students benefit from understanding acceptance criteria and tailoring applications to improve their chances at top programs.

Best Scientists Citing Mohamed Athmane Yallese

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles