World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Mustafa Kuntoğlu

Mustafa Kuntoğlu

D-Index & Metrics

Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering

D-Index
37
Citations
4613
World Ranking
2438
National Ranking
16

Mustafa Kuntoğlu publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mustafa Kuntoğlu sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 659+

This scientist: 83 publications — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

Mustafa Kuntoğlu D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mustafa Kuntoğlu sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Artificial intelligence systems for tool condition monitoring in machining: analysis and critical review

    Unknown

  • A state-of-the-art review on tool wear and surface integrity characteristics in machining of superalloys

    Murat Sarıkaya;Munish Kumar Gupta;Italo Tomaz;Danil Yu Pimenov

  • A Review of Indirect Tool Condition Monitoring Systems and Decision-Making Methods in Turning: Critical Analysis and Trends.

    Mustafa Kuntoğlu;Abdullah Aslan;Danil Yurievich Pimenov;Üsame Ali Usca

  • Development of lattice structure with selective laser melting process: A state of the art on properties, future trends and challenges

    Unknown

  • Resource saving by optimization and machining environments for sustainable manufacturing: A review and future prospects

    Unknown

  • Investigation of progressive tool wear for determining of optimized machining parameters in turning

    Mustafa Kuntoğlu;Hacı Sağlam

  • Investigation of signal behaviors for sensor fusion with tool condition monitoring system in turning

    Mustafa Kuntoğlu;Hacı Sağlam

  • Experimental study and analysis of machinability characteristics of metal matrix composites during drilling

    Emin Salur;Abdullah Aslan;Mustafa Kuntoglu;Aydın Gunes

  • The Effects of MQL and Dry Environments on Tool Wear, Cutting Temperature, and Power Consumption during End Milling of AISI 1040 Steel

    Emin Salur;Mustafa Kuntoğlu;Abdullah Aslan;Danil Yurievich Pimenov

  • Tool Wear Patterns and Their Promoting Mechanisms in Hybrid Cooling Assisted Machining of Titanium Ti-3Al-2.5V/grade 9 Alloy

    Unknown

  • Modeling of Cutting Parameters and Tool Geometry for Multi-Criteria Optimization of Surface Roughness and Vibration via Response Surface Methodology in Turning of AISI 5140 Steel

    Mustafa Kuntoğlu;Abdullah Aslan;Danil Yurievich Pimenov;Khaled Giasin

  • Indirect monitoring of machining characteristics via advanced sensor systems: a critical review

    Unknown

  • Effect of ball milling time on the structural characteristics and mechanical properties of nano-sized Y2O3 particle reinforced aluminum matrix composites produced by powder metallurgy route

    Emin Salur;Abdullah Aslan;Mustafa Kuntoğlu;Mustafa Acarer

  • Optimization and Analysis of Surface Roughness, Flank Wear and 5 Different Sensorial Data via Tool Condition Monitoring System in Turning of AISI 5140.

    Mustafa Kuntoğlu;Abdullah Aslan;Hacı Sağlam;Danil Yurievich Pimenov

  • Comparison of Tool Wear, Surface Morphology, Specific Cutting Energy and Cutting Temperature in Machining of Titanium Alloys Under Hybrid and Green Cooling Strategies

    Unknown

  • Tool wear, surface roughness, cutting temperature and chips morphology evaluation of Al/TiN coated carbide cutting tools in milling of Cu–B–CrC based ceramic matrix composites

    Unknown

  • A state-of-the-art review on sensors and signal processing systems in mechanical machining processes

    Mustafa Kuntoğlu;Emin Salur;Munish Kumar Gupta;Munish Kumar Gupta;Munish Kumar Gupta;Murat Sarıkaya

  • A Short Review on Thermal Treatments of Titanium & Nickel Based Alloys Processed by Selective Laser Melting

    Unknown

  • A comprehensive review of machinability of difficult-to-machine alloys with advanced lubricating and cooling techniques

    Unknown

  • A review on conventional and advanced minimum quantity lubrication approaches on performance measures of grinding process

    Munish Kumar Gupta;Munish Kumar Gupta;Aqib Mashood Khan;Qinghua Song;Zhanqiang Liu

Frequent Co-Authors

Munish Kumar Gupta
Munish Kumar Gupta Opole University of Technology
Khaled Giasin
Khaled Giasin University of Portsmouth
Murat Sarıkaya
Murat Sarıkaya Sinop University
Mozammel Mia
Mozammel Mia BRAC University
Qinghua Song
Qinghua Song Shandong University
Zhanqiang Liu
Zhanqiang Liu Shandong University
Muhammad Jamil
Muhammad Jamil Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics
Navneet Khanna
Navneet Khanna Institute of Infrastructure Technology Research and Management
Grzegorz Krolczyk
Grzegorz Krolczyk Opole University of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative yet related fields can enrich your career prospects beyond Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering. For those interested in human behavior and support roles, programs like the easiest counseling degree programs offer accessible entry into mental health professions. These can complement technical skills with valuable interpersonal expertise.

Similarly, if you want to advance swiftly in specialized fields of behavior science, consider the fast track ABA masters online. This pathway provides an accelerated route to a master's degree, ideal for professionals seeking quick upskilling opportunities.

For those intrigued by speech and language services, understanding whether is it hard to get into SLP grad school can guide your preparation and application process. Alongside this, knowing the easiest SLP programs to get into can help identify options that align with your profile and timeline.

Considering these related online degrees expands your skill set and career choices, offering new pathways in interdisciplinary fields allied to engineering.

Best Scientists Citing Mustafa Kuntoğlu

Recently Published Articles