World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering 47 1400 1293 98 86 145 6077

Khaled Giasin publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Khaled Giasin between 2015 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Khaled Giasin published across 11 years, from 2015 to 2025, averaging 13.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 62 publications in 2021. 9 of the 149 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2015 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 62. Peak 62 publications in 2021. 2015: 1 publication 2016: 6 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 4 publications 2020: 14 publications 2021: 62 publications 2022: 38 publications 2023: 10 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 3 publications
2015 2025

149 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Khaled Giasin: publications per year, 2015 to 2025
Year Publications
2015 1
2016 6
2017 4
2018 1
2019 4
2020 14
2021 62
2022 38
2023 10
2024 6
2025 3
Total 149
Download as CSV

Khaled Giasin publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Khaled Giasin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 659+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 155. Most scientists, 155, have 147–156 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 137–146 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 659+

This scientist: 145 publications — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 10
57–66 23
67–76 32
77–86 62
87–96 67
97–106 91
107–116 113
117–126 115
127–136 130
137–146 140 145
147–156 155
157–166 132
167–176 133
177–186 130
187–196 140
197–206 115
207–216 125
217–226 117
227–236 99
237–246 92
247–256 100
257–266 95
267–276 88
277–286 77
287–296 74
297–306 74
307–316 62
317–326 70
327–336 59
337–346 58
347–356 45
357–366 44
367–376 36
377–386 41
387–396 32
397–406 23
407–416 28
417–426 27
427–436 25
437–446 23
447–456 23
457–466 20
467–476 12
477–486 24
487–496 18
497–506 12
507–516 13
517–526 21
527–536 12
537–546 8
547–556 16
557–566 3
567–576 11
577–586 6
587–596 5
597–606 6
607–616 7
617–626 7
627–636 10
637–646 4
647–656 3
657–658 2
659+ 100
Download as CSV

Khaled Giasin D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Khaled Giasin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 93+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 189. Most scientists, 189, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 83
31 113
32 144
33 153
34 189
35 158
36 139
37 127
38 130
39 126
40 104
41 100
42 107
43 101
44 103
45 79
46 88
47 70 47
48 83
49 44
50 64
51 56
52 50
53 48
54 58
55 52
56 48
57 42
58 34
59 42
60 37
61 42
62 44
63 22
64 33
65 29
66 23
67 29
68 24
69 19
70 34
71 26
72 19
73 18
74 19
75 14
76 19
77 8
78 18
79 16
80 12
81 17
82 11
83 16
84 7
85 9
86 8
87 6
88 6
89 7
90 10
91 4
92 4
93+ 100
Download as CSV

Best Publications

  • Recent advances in drilling of carbon fiber–reinforced polymers for aerospace applications: a review

    Muhammad Aamir;Majid Tolouei-Rad;Khaled Giasin;Ataollah Nosrati

  • A Review of Indirect Tool Condition Monitoring Systems and Decision-Making Methods in Turning: Critical Analysis and Trends.

    Mustafa Kuntoğlu;Abdullah Aslan;Danil Yurievich Pimenov;Üsame Ali Usca

  • A review: drilling performance and hole quality of aluminium alloys for aerospace applications

    Muhammad Aamir;Khaled Giasin;Majid Tolouei-Rad;Ana Vafadar

  • A Comprehensive Review of Friction Stir Techniques in Structural Materials and Alloys: Challenges and Trends

    Unknown

  • An Investigation of burrs, chip formation, hole size, circularity and delamination during drilling operation of GLARE using ANOVA

    Khaled Giasin;Sabino Ayvar-Soberanis

  • Effect of mixing method and particle size on hardness and compressive strength of aluminium based metal matrix composite prepared through powder metallurgy route

    Unknown

  • An experimental study on drilling of unidirectional GLARE fibre metal laminates

    Khaled Giasin;S. Ayvar-Soberanis;A. Hodzic

  • Assessment of cutting forces and hole quality in drilling Al2024 aluminium alloy: experimental and finite element study

    Khaled Giasin;Alma Hodzic;Vaibhav Phadnis;Sabino Ayvar-Soberanis

  • Modeling of Cutting Parameters and Tool Geometry for Multi-Criteria Optimization of Surface Roughness and Vibration via Response Surface Methodology in Turning of AISI 5140 Steel

    Mustafa Kuntoğlu;Abdullah Aslan;Danil Yurievich Pimenov;Khaled Giasin

  • Experimental analysis and optimization of EDM parameters on HcHcr steel in context with different electrodes and dielectric fluids using hybrid Taguchi-based PCA-Utility and CRITIC-Utility approaches

    Manjunath Patel Gowdru Chandrashekarappa;Sandeep Kumar;Daniel Yurievich Pimenov;Khaled Giasin

  • Optimization and Analysis of Surface Roughness, Flank Wear and 5 Different Sensorial Data via Tool Condition Monitoring System in Turning of AISI 5140.

    Mustafa Kuntoğlu;Abdullah Aslan;Hacı Sağlam;Danil Yurievich Pimenov

  • Evaluation of cryogenic cooling and minimum quantity lubrication effects on machining GLARE laminates using design of experiments

    Khaled Giasin;S. Ayvar-Soberanis;A. Hodzic

  • Machining parameter optimization and experimental investigations of nano-graphene mixed electrical discharge machining of Nitinol Shape memory alloy

    Unknown

  • Tool wear, surface roughness, cutting temperature and chips morphology evaluation of Al/TiN coated carbide cutting tools in milling of Cu–B–CrC based ceramic matrix composites

    Unknown

  • Tool wear prediction in face milling of stainless steel using singular generative adversarial network and LSTM deep learning models

    Unknown

  • Recent Advances in Bipedal Walking Robots: Review of Gait, Drive, Sensors and Control Systems

    Unknown

  • An Innovative Agile Model of Smart Lean–Green Approach for Sustainability Enhancement in Industry 4.0

    Varun Tripathi;Somnath Chattopadhyaya;Alok K. Mukhopadhyay;Shubham Sharma

  • 3D Finite Element Modelling of Cutting Forces in Drilling Fibre Metal Laminates and Experimental Hole Quality Analysis

    Khaled Giasin;Sabino Ayvar-Soberanis;Toby French;Vaibhav Phadnis

  • Optimization and Modeling of Process Parameters in Multi-Hole Simultaneous Drilling Using Taguchi Method and Fuzzy Logic Approach

    Muhammad Aamir;Shanshan Tu;Majid Tolouei-Rad;Khaled Giasin

  • Experimental investigation and optimization of compression moulding parameters for MWCNT/glass/kevlar/epoxy composites on mechanical and tribological properties

    Hanumantharaya Rangaswamy;Harsha H. M;Manjunath Patel Gowdru Chandrashekarappa;Danil Yurievich Pimenov

Frequent Co-Authors

Munish Kumar Gupta
Munish Kumar Gupta Opole University of Technology
Mustafa Kuntoğlu
Mustafa Kuntoğlu Selçuk University
Jay J. Vora
Jay J. Vora Pandit Deendayal Petroleum University
Hom Nath Dhakal
Hom Nath Dhakal University of Portsmouth
Somnath Chattopadhyaya
Somnath Chattopadhyaya Indian Institute of Technology Dhanbad
Zhongyi Zhang
Zhongyi Zhang University of Portsmouth
Aqib Mashood Khan
Aqib Mashood Khan Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics
Tarek Mabrouki
Tarek Mabrouki Tunis El Manar University
Catalin Iulian Pruncu
Catalin Iulian Pruncu University of Birmingham
Redouane Zitoune
Redouane Zitoune Federal University of Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

While Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering offer exciting career opportunities, many students explore related fields to complement their expertise or discover alternative pathways. For those interested in behavioral science, pursuing a fastest online masters in applied behavior analysis can open doors to roles focused on human behavior and therapy, providing a valuable skill set alongside technical knowledge.

Another adjacent area is the broad range of therapy professions. Choosing from different therapy degrees allows students to understand mental health and counseling, which is increasingly valuable in multidisciplinary teams and leadership positions.

For those looking for more accessible entry points into the counseling field, exploring the best easiest counseling degree programs can offer an efficient route to credentialing and employment, especially for professionals seeking to pivot their careers.

Lastly, some professionals with an engineering background may consider careers in law enforcement and criminology. Understanding roles like an FBI profiler, including insights into criminal profiler salary and job prospects, helps illustrate the diverse career options accessible with a strong analytical and technical foundation.

Best Scientists Citing Khaled Giasin

Recently Published Articles