World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering 41 1967 1821 237 237 132 5026

Jinyang Xu publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jinyang Xu between 2002 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jinyang Xu published across 24 years, from 2002 to 2025, averaging 7 papers a year. Output peaked at 36 publications in 2022. 29 of the 168 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2002 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 36. Peak 36 publications in 2022. 2002: 1 publication 2003: 0 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 0 publications 2010: 0 publications 2011: 1 publication 2012: 4 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 2 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 14 publications 2021: 17 publications 2022: 36 publications 2023: 26 publications 2024: 19 publications 2025: 10 publications
2002 2025

168 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jinyang Xu: publications per year, 2002 to 2025
Year Publications
2002 1
2003 0
2004 0
2005 0
2006 0
2007 0
2008 1
2009 0
2010 0
2011 1
2012 4
2013 6
2014 4
2015 2
2016 12
2017 2
2018 4
2019 9
2020 14
2021 17
2022 36
2023 26
2024 19
2025 10
Total 168
Download as CSV

Jinyang Xu publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jinyang Xu sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 659+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 155. Most scientists, 155, have 147–156 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 127–136 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 659+

This scientist: 132 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 10
57–66 23
67–76 32
77–86 62
87–96 67
97–106 91
107–116 113
117–126 115
127–136 130 132
137–146 140
147–156 155
157–166 132
167–176 133
177–186 130
187–196 140
197–206 115
207–216 125
217–226 117
227–236 99
237–246 92
247–256 100
257–266 95
267–276 88
277–286 77
287–296 74
297–306 74
307–316 62
317–326 70
327–336 59
337–346 58
347–356 45
357–366 44
367–376 36
377–386 41
387–396 32
397–406 23
407–416 28
417–426 27
427–436 25
437–446 23
447–456 23
457–466 20
467–476 12
477–486 24
487–496 18
497–506 12
507–516 13
517–526 21
527–536 12
537–546 8
547–556 16
557–566 3
567–576 11
577–586 6
587–596 5
597–606 6
607–616 7
617–626 7
627–636 10
637–646 4
647–656 3
657–658 2
659+ 100
Download as CSV

Jinyang Xu D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jinyang Xu sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 93+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 189. Most scientists, 189, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 83
31 113
32 144
33 153
34 189
35 158
36 139
37 127
38 130
39 126
40 104
41 100 41
42 107
43 101
44 103
45 79
46 88
47 70
48 83
49 44
50 64
51 56
52 50
53 48
54 58
55 52
56 48
57 42
58 34
59 42
60 37
61 42
62 44
63 22
64 33
65 29
66 23
67 29
68 24
69 19
70 34
71 26
72 19
73 18
74 19
75 14
76 19
77 8
78 18
79 16
80 12
81 17
82 11
83 16
84 7
85 9
86 8
87 6
88 6
89 7
90 10
91 4
92 4
93+ 100
Download as CSV

Best Publications

  • Recent advances in drilling hybrid FRP/Ti composite: A state-of-the-art review

    Jinyang Xu;Ali Mkaddem;Mohamed El Mansori

  • Study of drilling-induced defects for CFRP composites using new criteria

    Jinyang Xu;Chao Li;Sipei Mi;Qinglong An

  • Wear performance of (nc-AlTiN)/(a-Si3N4) coating and (nc-AlCrN)/(a-Si3N4) coating in high-speed machining of titanium alloys under dry and minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) conditions

    Zhiqiang Liu;Zhiqiang Liu;Qinglong An;Jinyang Xu;Ming Chen

  • A critical review of the drilling of CFRP composites: Burr formation, characterisation and challenges

    Unknown

  • Experimental study on drilling mechanisms and strategies of hybrid CFRP/Ti stacks

    Jinyang Xu;Jinyang Xu;Mohamed El Mansori

  • A comparative evaluation of polycrystalline diamond drills in drilling high-strength T800S/250F CFRP

    Jinyang Xu;Jinyang Xu;Qinglong An;Ming Chen

  • A critical review addressing drilling-induced damage of CFRP composites

    Unknown

  • Drilling machinability evaluation on new developed high-strength T800S/250F CFRP laminates

    Jinyang Xu;Qinglong An;Xiaojiang Cai;Ming Chen

  • On the analysis of temperatures, surface morphologies and tool wear in drilling CFRP/Ti6Al4V stacks under different cutting sequence strategies

    Jinyang Xu;Chao Li;Ming Chen;Mohamed El Mansori;Mohamed El Mansori

  • A review on CFRP drilling: fundamental mechanisms, damage issues, and approaches toward high-quality drilling

    Unknown

  • On the machining behavior of carbon fiber reinforced polyimide and PEEK thermoplastic composites

    Jinyang Xu;Xianghui Huang;J. Paulo Davim;Min Ji

  • Comparative study of minimum quantity lubrication and dry drilling of CFRP/titanium stacks using TiAlN and diamond coated drills

    Jinyang Xu;Min Ji;J. Paulo Davim;Ming Chen

  • An investigation of drilling high-strength CFRP composites using specialized drills

    Jinyang Xu;Chao Li;Ming Chen;Mohamed El Mansori;Mohamed El Mansori

  • A review on advanced cutting tools and technologies for edge trimming of carbon fibre reinforced polymer (CFRP) composites

    Unknown

  • A critical review on mechanical micro-drilling of glass and carbon fibre reinforced polymer (GFRP and CFRP) composites

    Unknown

  • A state-of-the-art review on mechanical characteristics of different fiber metal laminates for aerospace and structural applications

    Unknown

  • Experimental investigation on hard milling of high strength steel using PVD-AlTiN coated cemented carbide tool

    Qinglong An;Changying Wang;Jinyang Xu;Pulin Liu

  • Experimental study on mechanical drilling of carbon/epoxy composite-Ti6Al4V stacks

    Unknown

  • Wear behavior of special tools in the drilling of CFRP composite laminates

    Jinyang Xu;Tieyu Lin;J. Paulo Davim;Ming Chen

Frequent Co-Authors

Mohamed El Mansori
Mohamed El Mansori Arts et Metiers Institute of Technology
J. Paulo Davim
J. Paulo Davim University of Aveiro
Qinglong An
Qinglong An Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Weiwei Ming
Weiwei Ming Shanghai Jiao Tong University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

While studying Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in the USA offers a strong foundation in design and innovation, many students explore related fields to diversify their career options. For example, understanding different types of therapist degrees can open up alternative pathways in healthcare and human services, providing interdisciplinary skills that complement engineering roles.

For those interested in flexible learning schedules, exploring easy counseling degree programs online can be a practical choice. These programs allow students to balance technical coursework with personal development studies, making it easier to pivot between engineering and counseling professions.

Additionally, pursuing the quickest online ABA masters program offers accelerated opportunities in applied behavior analysis, which is valuable in areas like human factors engineering or occupational therapy. Such programs provide a specialized skill set that can enhance engineers’ understanding of user behavior and ergonomics.

It's also useful to consider prerequisites and requirements, much like those faced by applicants in speech language pathology graduate programs, when planning advanced degrees. Understanding these acceptance criteria can help engineering students strategize their educational paths effectively.

Best Scientists Citing Jinyang Xu

Recently Published Articles