World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
43
Citations
6079
World Ranking
1729
National Ranking
120

Clément Mouhot publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Clément Mouhot sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 82 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 96 publications — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

Clément Mouhot D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Clément Mouhot sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 137 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Overview

Clément Mouhot is a researcher affiliated with the University of Cambridge in the United Kingdom. Their work primarily focuses on mathematics, with significant contributions in applied mathematics, mathematical physics, modeling and simulation, computational mechanics, and statistical and nonlinear physics.

The main topics in Mouhot's research include:

  • Gas Dynamics and Kinetic Theory
  • Numerical methods in inverse problems
  • Mathematical Biology Tumor Growth
  • Advanced Mathematical Physics Problems
  • Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
  • Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics
  • High-Energy Particle Collisions Research

Mouhot has published extensively, with a total of 38 publications in the field of mathematics. Their frequent publication venues include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis
  • Séminaire Laurent Schwartz - EDP et applications
  • Annales Henri Lebesgue
  • Journal de l'École polytechnique - Mathématiques

Some recent papers authored or coauthored by Mouhot include:

  • "The Schauder estimate in kinetic theory with application to a toy nonlinear model" (2021) - Annales Henri Lebesgue
  • "Quantitative De Giorgi methods in kinetic theory" (2022) - Journal de l'École polytechnique - Mathématiques
  • "Linearized Wave-Damping Structure of Vlasov--Poisson in ℝ³" (2022) - SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis
  • "Quantitative fluid approximation in transport theory: a unified approach" (2022) - Probability and Mathematical Physics
  • "Hypocoercivity without confinement" (2020) - Pure and Applied Analysis

Mouhot has collaborated frequently with several coauthors, including:

  • Frédéric Hérau
  • Émeric Bouin
  • Jean Dolbeault
  • Stéphane Mischler
  • Helge Dietert

Best Publications

  • On Landau damping

    Clément Mouhot;Cédric Villani

  • Hypocoercivity for linear kinetic equations conserving mass

    Jean Dolbeault;Clément Mouhot;Christian Schmeiser

  • Quantitative perturbative study of convergence to equilibrium for collisional kinetic models in the torus

    Clement Gabriel Mouhot;L Neumann

  • Fast algorithms for computing the Boltzmann collision operator

    Clément Mouhot;Lorenzo Pareschi

  • Kac’s program in kinetic theory

    Stéphane Mischler;Clément Mouhot

  • Fractional Diffusion Limit for Collisional Kinetic Equations

    Antoine Mellet;Stéphane Mischler;Stéphane Mischler;Clément Mouhot

  • Harnack inequality for kinetic Fokker-Planck equations with rough coefficients and application to the Landau equation

    François Golse;Cyril Imbert;Alexis Vasseur

  • Solving the Boltzmann Equation in N log 2 N

    Francis Filbet;Clément Mouhot;Lorenzo Pareschi

  • Rate of convergence to equilibrium for the spatially homogeneous Boltzmann equation with hard potentials

    Clément Mouhot;Clément Mouhot

  • Landau Damping: Paraproducts and Gevrey Regularity

    Jacob Bedrossian;Nader Masmoudi;Clément Mouhot

  • Regularity Theory for the Spatially Homogeneous Boltzmann Equation with Cut-Off

    Clément Mouhot;Cédric Villani

  • Hypocoercivity for kinetic equations with linear relaxation terms

    Jean Dolbeault;Clément Mouhot;Christian Schmeiser

  • Factorization for non-symmetric operators and exponential H-theorem

    Maria Pia Gualdani;Stéphane Mischler;Clément Mouhot

  • On the Mean Field and Classical Limits of Quantum Mechanics

    François Golse;Clément Mouhot;Thierry Paul

  • Explicit Coercivity Estimates for the Linearized Boltzmann and Landau Operators

    Clément Mouhot

  • Spectral gap and coercivity estimates for linearized Boltzmann collision operators without angular cutoff

    Clément Mouhot;Robert M. Strain

  • Explicit spectral gap estimates for the linearized Boltzmann and Landau operators with hard potentials

    Céline Baranger;Clément Mouhot

  • A new approach to quantitative propagation of chaos for drift, diffusion and jump processes

    Stéphane Mischler;Clément Mouhot;Bernt Wennberg;Bernt Wennberg

  • On measure solutions of the Boltzmann equation, part I: Moment production and stability estimates

    Xuguang Lu;Clement Gabriel Mouhot

  • Exponential Stability of Slowly Decaying Solutions to the Kinetic-Fokker-Planck Equation

    Stéphane Mischler;Clément Mouhot

  • Harnack inequality for kinetic Fokker-Planck equations with rough coefficients and application to the Landau equation

    F Golse;Cyril Imbert;Clément Mouhot;Alexis Vasseur

Frequent Co-Authors

Stéphane Mischler
Stéphane Mischler Paris Dauphine University
Cyril Imbert
Cyril Imbert École Normale Supérieure
Cédric Villani
Cédric Villani École Normale Supérieure de Rennes
Christian Schmeiser
Christian Schmeiser University of Vienna
Jean Dolbeault
Jean Dolbeault Paris Dauphine University
Nader Masmoudi
Nader Masmoudi Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences
Eric A. Carlen
Eric A. Carlen Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Laurent Desvillettes
Laurent Desvillettes Université Paris Cité
Joel L. Lebowitz
Joel L. Lebowitz Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Lorenzo Pareschi
Lorenzo Pareschi Heriot-Watt University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a mathematics degree in the USA opens doors to versatile career options, especially when combined with business or finance expertise. Many students complement their math background with advanced studies in management or finance through online programs that offer flexibility and accelerated timelines.

For those seeking to enhance leadership skills, exploring the easiest online mba programs can be an effective stepping stone. These programs often provide a balance of rigorous coursework and manageable pacing, making them accessible to working professionals.

Similarly, if you're interested in doctoral-level advancement, consider looking into a 1 year dba program online. These streamlined options allow you to obtain a doctorate in business administration without the traditional multi-year commitment.

Finance professionals with a strong math foundation may also benefit from a masters in finance online programs, which blend quantitative analysis with market strategy for enhanced career prospects.

For those eager to quickly upskill, the shortest mba program online offers an accelerated pathway to gain essential business competencies alongside your mathematical expertise.

Best Scientists Citing Clément Mouhot

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles