World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
41
Citations
5866
World Ranking
7061
National Ranking
1920

Scott Samuelsen publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott Samuelsen sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 218 publications — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Scott Samuelsen D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott Samuelsen sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2005 - Fellow of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers

Overview

Scott Samuelsen is affiliated with the University of California, Irvine in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on areas within engineering and environmental science, with a substantial output in electrical and electronic engineering, automotive engineering, energy engineering and power technology, pollution, and renewable energy and sustainability.

The main topics of their work include:

  • Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
  • Advanced Battery Technologies Research
  • Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems
  • Energy and Environment Impacts
  • Chemical Looping and Thermochemical Processes
  • Vehicle emissions and performance
  • Advancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells

Samuelsen has published extensively in several notable venues, including:

  • Applied Energy
  • International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
  • Journal of Power Sources
  • Environmental Science & Technology
  • Energy Conversion and Management

Among their recent papers are:

  • Estimating the technical feasibility of fuel cell and battery electric vehicles for the medium and heavy duty sectors in California, 2020, Applied Energy
  • Assessing concurrent effects of climate change on hydropower supply, electricity demand, and greenhouse gas emissions in the Upper Yangtze River Basin of China, 2020, Applied Energy
  • Forecasting renewable hydrogen production technology shares under cost uncertainty, 2021, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
  • Flow battery production: Materials selection and environmental impact, 2020, Journal of Cleaner Production
  • Decarbonization will lead to more equitable air quality in California, 2022, Nature Communications

The scientist has collaborated frequently with several co-authors, including:

  • Fabian Rosner
  • Michael Mac Kinnon
  • Ghazal Razeghi
  • Shupeng Zhu
  • Brian Tarroja

Scott Samuelsen has been recognized as a Fellow of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers since 2005.

Best Publications

  • The role of natural gas and its infrastructure in mitigating greenhouse gas emissions, improving regional air quality, and renewable resource integration

    Michael A. Mac Kinnon;Jacob Brouwer;Scott Samuelsen

  • Influence of hydrogen addition to pipeline natural gas on the combustion performance of a cooktop burner

    Yan Zhao;Vincent McDonell;Scott Samuelsen

  • Estimating the technical feasibility of fuel cell and battery electric vehicles for the medium and heavy duty sectors in California

    Kate Forrest;Michael Mac Kinnon;Brian Tarroja;Scott Samuelsen

  • Dynamic Simulation of an Integrated Solid Oxide Fuel Cell System Including Current-Based Fuel Flow Control

    Fabian Mueller;Jacob Brouwer;Faryar Jabbari;Scott Samuelsen

  • Integration of distributed generation systems into generic types of commercial buildings in California

    M. Medrano;J. Brouwer;V. McDonell;J. Mauzey

  • Quantifying climate change impacts on hydropower generation and implications on electric grid greenhouse gas emissions and operation

    Brian Tarroja;Amir AghaKouchak;Scott Samuelsen

  • Evaluation of charging infrastructure requirements and operating costs for plug-in electric vehicles

    Li Zhang;Tim Brown;Scott Samuelsen

  • Impacts of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles on a residential transformer using stochastic and empirical analysis

    Ghazal Razeghi;Li Zhang;Tim Brown;Scott Samuelsen

  • Coordinating plug-in electric vehicle charging with electric grid: Valley filling and target load following

    Li Zhang;Faryar Jabbari;Tim Brown;Scott Samuelsen

  • Buffering intermittent renewable power with hydroelectric generation: A case study in California

    Martin K. Chang;Joshua D. Eichman;Fabian Mueller;Scott Samuelsen

  • Assessing the stationary energy storage equivalency of vehicle-to-grid charging battery electric vehicles

    Brian Tarroja;Li Zhang;Van Wifvat;Brendan Shaffer

  • Charging a renewable future: The impact of electric vehicle charging intelligence on energy storage requirements to meet renewable portfolio standards

    Kate E. Forrest;Brian Tarroja;Li Zhang;Brendan Shaffer

  • Assessing concurrent effects of climate change on hydropower supply, electricity demand, and greenhouse gas emissions in the Upper Yangtze River Basin of China

    Pengcheng Qin;Hongmei Xu;Min Liu;Chan Xiao

  • Exploration of the integration of renewable resources into California's electric system using the Holistic Grid Resource Integration and Deployment (HiGRID) tool

    Joshua D. Eichman;Fabian Mueller;Brian Tarroja;Lori Smith Schell

  • Translating climate change and heating system electrification impacts on building energy use to future greenhouse gas emissions and electric grid capacity requirements in California

    Brian Tarroja;Felicia Chiang;Amir AghaKouchak;Scott Samuelsen

  • Metrics for evaluating the impacts of intermittent renewable generation on utility load-balancing

    Brian Tarroja;Fabian Mueller;Joshua D. Eichman;Scott Samuelsen

  • Spatial and temporal analysis of electric wind generation intermittency and dynamics

    Brian Tarroja;Fabian Mueller;Joshua D. Eichman;Jack Brouwer

  • Forecasting renewable hydrogen production technology shares under cost uncertainty

    Blake Lane;Jeffrey Reed;Brendan Shaffer;Scott Samuelsen

  • The importance of grid integration for achievable greenhouse gas emissions reductions from alternative vehicle technologies

    Brian Tarroja;Brendan Shaffer;Scott Samuelsen

  • Dynamic modeling and evaluation of solid oxide fuel cell - combined heat and power system operating strategies

    Kimihiro Nanaeda;Fabian Mueller;Jacob Brouwer;Scott Samuelsen

  • Fuel cell–gas turbine hybrid system design part II: Dynamics and control

    Dustin McLarty;Jack Brouwer;Scott Samuelsen

Frequent Co-Authors

Vincent McDonell
Vincent McDonell University of California, Irvine
Amir AghaKouchak
Amir AghaKouchak University of California, Irvine
Jacob Brouwer
Jacob Brouwer University of California, Irvine
Donald Dabdub
Donald Dabdub University of California, Irvine
Faryar Jabbari
Faryar Jabbari University of California, Irvine
Keyue Smedley
Keyue Smedley University of California, Irvine
Julie M. Schoenung
Julie M. Schoenung University of California, Irvine
Steven J. Davis
Steven J. Davis Stanford University
Sunny C. Jiang
Sunny C. Jiang University of California, Irvine
Tianzhen Hong
Tianzhen Hong Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The evolving landscape of Engineering and Technology in the USA now offers a variety of online degree programs that cater to both practical and emerging industry needs. Flexible online options have made it easier for students to upskill or switch career paths while continuing to work or balance life commitments.

For those interested in organizational leadership in tech settings, enrolling in a project management online degree program can be a strategic move. Project management skills are highly valued and span industries well beyond engineering.

The tech-driven real estate sector also offers opportunities to study through a cheap online real estate school, equipping students with the knowledge to navigate property markets influenced by technology and data analytics.

As digital product demand rises, students can pursue a ux design bachelor's degree online, focusing on crafting user-friendly experiences that bridge technology with human needs.

Wondering whether these paths are worthwhile? Explore the value and career benefits by reading: is a bachelor degree in project management worth it.

Best Scientists Citing Scott Samuelsen

Trending Scientists