World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
39
Citations
10328
World Ranking
7522
National Ranking
2059

Nadine Sarter publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nadine Sarter sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 139 publications — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Nadine Sarter D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nadine Sarter sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2019 - Member of the National Academy of Engineering For innovation in the design and use of tactile displays for improved safety in aviation, automobiles, and healthcare.

Overview

Nadine Sarter is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. Their research intersects psychology and engineering, with a focus on human-automation interaction and safety. The primary subfield contributions fall under social psychology, aerospace engineering, safety, risk, reliability and quality, surgery, and automotive engineering.

Their main research topics include:

  • Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
  • Safety Warnings and Signage
  • Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring
  • Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
  • Traffic and Road Safety
  • Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
  • 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage

Several frequent coauthors have collaborated on multiple publications with Sarter. These include Ella Atkins, Paul Flanigen, Yidu Lu, Yuzhi Wan, and R. Brent Gillespie.

Many of Sarter's works have been published in leading venues such as:

  • Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
  • IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems
  • IEEE Access
  • Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
  • Sensors

Notable recent papers authored or coauthored by Sarter include:

  • "Modeling and inferring human trust in automation based on real-time eye tracking data" (2020, Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting)
  • "The Effects of Haptic Feedback and Transition Type on Transfer of Control Between Drivers and Vehicle Automation" (2021, IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems)
  • "Moving From Piloted to Autonomous Operations: Investigating Human Factors Challenges in Urban Air Mobility" (2021, Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting)
  • "Comparing Coupled and Decoupled Steering Interface Designs for Emergency Obstacle Evasion" (2021, IEEE Access)
  • "Attention Limitations in the Detection and Identification of Alarms in Close Temporal Proximity" (2022, Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society)

Sarter was recognized as a Member of the National Academy of Engineering in 2019 for innovation in the design and use of tactile displays for improved safety in aviation, automobiles, and healthcare.

Best Publications

  • How in the world did we ever get into that mode? Mode error and awareness in supervisory control

    Nadine B. Sarter;David D. Woods

  • Situation Awareness: A Critical But Ill-Defined Phenomenon

    Nadine B. Sarter;David D. Woods

  • Behind Human Error: Cognitive Systems, Computers and Hindsight

    David D. Woods;Leila J. Johannesen;Richard I. Cook;Nadine B. Sarter

  • Tactile displays: guidance for their design and application.

    Lynette A. Jones;Nadine B. Sarter

  • Behind Human Error

    David D. Woods;Sidney Dekker;Richard Cook;Leila Johannesen

  • Pilot Interaction With Cockpit Automation II: An Experimental Study of Pilots’ Model and Awareness of the Flight Management System

    Nadine B. Sarter;David D. Woods

  • Pilot Interaction With Cockpit Automation: Operational Experiences With the Flight Management System

    Nadine B. Sarter;David D. Woods

  • Pilots' monitoring strategies and performance on automated flight decks: an empirical study combining behavioral and eye-tracking data

    Nadine B. Sarter;Randall J. Mumaw;Christopher D. Wickens

  • Team play with a powerful and independent agent: operational experiences and automation surprises on the Airbus A-320

    Nadine B. Sarter;David D. Woods

  • Supporting Trust Calibration and the Effective Use of Decision Aids by Presenting Dynamic System Confidence Information

    Unknown

  • Multimodal information presentation: Design guidance and research challenges

    Nadine B. Sarter

  • Supporting Decision Making and Action Selection under Time Pressure and Uncertainty: The Case of In-Flight Icing

    Unknown

  • Stages and Levels of Automation: An Integrated Meta-analysis

    Christopher D. Wickens;Huiyang Li;Amy Santamaria;Angelia Sebok

  • Smart icing systems for aircraft icing safety

    Michael B. Bragg;Tamer Basar;William R. Perkins;Michael S. Selig

  • Cognitive Engineering in the Aviation Domain

    Nadine B. Sarter;René Amalberti

  • Display clutter: a review of definitions and measurement techniques

    Nadine Moacdieh;Nadine B. Sarter

  • Team Play with a Powerful and Independent Agent: A Full-Mission Simulation Study:

    Nadine B. Sarter;David D. Woods

  • Supporting interruption management and multimodal interface design: three meta-analyses of task performance as a function of interrupting task modality.

    Sara A. Lu;Christopher D. Wickens;Julie C. Prinet;Shaun D. Hutchins

  • Error Types and Related Error Detection Mechanisms in the Aviation Domain: An Analysis of Aviation Safety Reporting System Incident Reports

    Unknown

  • Eye Tracking: A Process-Oriented Method for Inferring Trust in Automation as a Function of Priming and System Reliability

    Yidu Lu;Nadine Sarter

  • Investigating Mode Errors on Automated Flight Decks: Illustrating the Problem-Driven, Cumulative, and Interdisciplinary Nature of Human Factors Research

    Nadine B. Sarter

  • Capturing the dynamics of attention control from individual to distributed systems: the shape of models to come

    David D. Woods;Nadine B. Sarter

  • Situational Awareness in Complex Systems

    Richard D. Gilson;Lloyd Hitchcock;Richard A. Pew;Mica R. Endsley

  • Stages and levels of automation in support of space teleoperations.

    Huiyang Li;Christopher D. Wickens;Nadine B. Sarter;Angelia Sebok

Frequent Co-Authors

Christopher D. Wickens
Christopher D. Wickens Colorado State University
David Woods
David Woods The Ohio State University
Sidney Dekker
Sidney Dekker Griffith University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Engineering and Technology opens up a world of possibilities, but it also helps to be aware of alternate or complementary educational paths. Many students and professionals seek flexible, online programs that advance their skills and credentials in related areas, enabling quicker entry into the workforce or a transition into new fields.

For those interested in business management alongside tech, 18 month mba programs let you fast-track your business expertise, providing a solid grounding in leadership and project management. If you see yourself navigating the legal side of technology, an accelerated paralegal program online can qualify you for entry-level positions in legal departments and firms.

Those interested in finance aspects may consider a book keeping certificate, ideal for learning essential accounting software and practices. Additionally, a degree in office administration provides comprehensive skills in managing modern offices—an asset in both tech startups and established companies.

These online pathways offer flexibility and can complement your core studies in Engineering and Technology, opening doors to diverse and in-demand career opportunities.

Best Scientists Citing Nadine Sarter

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles