World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
52
Citations
15965
World Ranking
16463
National Ranking
276

Mike Waterfield publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mike Waterfield sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 98 publications — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Mike Waterfield D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mike Waterfield sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mike Waterfield is affiliated with Ludwig Cancer Research in Belgium. Their work is situated within the broader scientific community engaged in cancer research and related biomedical fields.

The available data does not include details on recent publications, co-authors, or specific research topics. However, their institutional connection implies involvement in research that addresses molecular and cellular mechanisms relevant to oncology.

Without specific records of papers, topics, or publication venues, it is not possible to provide a detailed breakdown of research subfields, main topics, or contributions. Additionally, there are no listed awards, giving no indication of recognition for particular achievements in their career.

As no book publications are associated with Mike Waterfield in this data, their scholarly output appears to focus primarily on scientific research articles, consistent with typical academic roles within research institutions. Similarly, no frequent co-authors or common publication venues are identified to further profile collaboration patterns or dissemination channels.

While explicit subject areas are not documented here, affiliation with Ludwig Cancer Research suggests expertise aligning with cancer biology, molecular oncology, and potentially drug discovery or experimental therapeutics, which are key domains within that organization.

Given the absence of citations or other bibliometric indicators, it is not possible to assess the impact or reach of their research within the scientific community. The profile remains focused on institutional association rather than detailed academic output or influence.

Best Publications

  • Close similarity of epidermal growth factor receptor and v- erb-B oncogene protein sequences

    J. Downward;Y. Yarden;E. Mayes;G. Scrace

  • Signaling by distinct classes of phosphoinositide 3-kinases

    B. Vanhaesebroeck;M.D. Waterfield;M.D. Waterfield

  • Autophosphorylation sites on the epidermal growth factor receptor.

    J. Downward;P. Parker;M. D. Waterfield

  • Activation of phosphoinositide 3-kinase by interaction with Ras and by point mutation.

    P Rodriguez-Viciana;P H Warne;B Vanhaesebroeck;M D Waterfield

  • Distinct specificity in the recognition of phosphoinositides by the pleckstrin homology domains of dynamin and Bruton's tyrosine kinase.

    K Salim;M J Bottomley;E Querfurth;M J Zvelebil

  • Pharmacologic characterization of a potent inhibitor of class I phosphatidylinositide 3-kinases.

    Florence I. Raynaud;Suzanne Eccles;Paul A. Clarke;Angela Hayes

  • PI 3-kinase: structural and functional analysis of intersubunit interactions.

    Ritu Dhand;K. Hara;I. Hiles;B. Bax

  • Cloning of the human oestrogen receptor cDNA.

    Stephen Green;Philippe Walter;Geoffrey Greene;Andrée Krust

  • Antibodies against a synthetic peptide as a probe for the kinase activity of the avian EGF receptor and v-erbb protein

    R.M. Kris;I. Lax;W. Gullick;M.D. Waterfield

  • Purification to homogeneity of protein kinase C from bovine brain--identity with the phorbol ester receptor.

    P J Parker;S Stabel;M D Waterfield

  • Autophosphorylation and protein kinase C phosphorylation of the epidermal growth factor receptor. Effect on tyrosine kinase activity and ligand binding affinity.

    J Downward;M D Waterfield;P J Parker

  • Using structure to define the function of phosphoinositide 3-kinase family members.

    J. Domin;M.D. Waterfield;M.D. Waterfield

  • Activation of Src family kinases by colony stimulating factor-1, and their association with its receptor.

    S A Courtneidge;R Dhand;D Pilat;G M Twamley

  • Synthesis and biological evaluation of 4-morpholino-2-phenylquinazolines and related derivatives as novel PI3 kinase p110α inhibitors

    Masahiko Hayakawa;Hiroyuki Kaizawa;Hiroyuki Moritomo;Tomonobu Koizumi

  • Tyr721 regulates specific binding of the CSF-1 receptor kinase insert to PI 3'-kinase SH2 domains: a model for SH2-mediated receptor-target interactions.

    M. Reedijk;Xingquan Liu;P. Van Der Geer;K. Letwin

  • Interactions between SH2 domains and tyrosine-phosphorylated platelet-derived growth factor beta-receptor sequences: analysis of kinetic parameters by a novel biosensor-based approach.

    G Panayotou;G Gish;P End;O Truong

  • Evaluation of epidermal growth factor receptors in bladder tumours

    M. S. Berger;C. Greenfield;W. J. Gullick;J. Haley

  • Structure of an SH2 domain of the p85 alpha subunit of phosphatidylinositol-3-OH kinase.

    G.W Booker;A.L Breeze;A.K Downing;G Panayotou

  • An SH3 domain and proline-rich sequence mediate an interaction between two components of the phagocyte NADPH oxidase complex.

    Peter Finan;Yazuaki Shimizu;Ivan Gout;Justin Hsuan

  • Primary structure of the human, membrane-associated Ca2+-binding protein p68 a novel member of a protein family.

    M. R. Crompton;R. J. Owens;N. F. Totty;S. E. Moss

Frequent Co-Authors

Ivan Gout
Ivan Gout University College London
Peter J. Parker
Peter J. Parker The Francis Crick Institute
George Panayotou
George Panayotou Ludwig Cancer Research
J. Justin Hsuan
J. Justin Hsuan University College London
Rainer Cramer
Rainer Cramer University of Reading
Julian Downward
Julian Downward The Francis Crick Institute
Bart Vanhaesebroeck
Bart Vanhaesebroeck University College London
Alexander Gammerman
Alexander Gammerman Royal Holloway University of London
Usha Menon
Usha Menon University College London
Ian Jacobs
Ian Jacobs University of New South Wales

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology and Biochemistry in the USA opens doors to a diverse range of online degrees and career opportunities in health and science. Many students opt for an online degree in nutrition, which builds on foundational biology knowledge to prepare graduates for roles in dietetics, wellness coaching, and food science.

For those interested in healthcare leadership, earning a master’s degree can be a strategic move. It’s important to consider credentials, such as cahme accreditation for mha programs, to ensure quality education in health administration. This certification can increase your career prospects and reputation in the field.

Advanced healthcare professionals seeking flexible learning might explore a dnp program no clinical. These programs allow experienced nurses to expand their scope without extensive in-person requirements.

Additionally, leadership-focused scientists can pursue a phd in healthcare management for careers in strategic planning, research, or academia.

Best Scientists Citing Mike Waterfield

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles