World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 64 2954 2714 1696 1524 129 17077

Mike Stoolmiller publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mike Stoolmiller between 1990 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mike Stoolmiller published across 35 years, from 1990 to 2024, averaging 4 papers a year. Output peaked at 10 publications in 2012. 9 of the 139 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1990 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 10. Peak 10 publications in 2012. 1990: 1 publication 1991: 2 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 2 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 6 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 3 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 1 publication 2021: 6 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 5 publications
1990 2024

139 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mike Stoolmiller: publications per year, 1990 to 2024
Year Publications
1990 1
1991 2
1992 0
1993 3
1994 3
1995 1
1996 2
1997 2
1998 6
1999 3
2000 1
2001 3
2002 2
2003 4
2004 5
2005 3
2006 4
2007 5
2008 6
2009 6
2010 7
2011 4
2012 10
2013 6
2014 3
2015 4
2016 2
2017 7
2018 8
2019 7
2020 1
2021 6
2022 3
2023 4
2024 5
Total 139
Download as CSV

Mike Stoolmiller publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mike Stoolmiller sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 121–130 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 129 publications — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670 129
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Mike Stoolmiller D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mike Stoolmiller sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 64–65 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290 64
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Mike Stoolmiller is affiliated with the University of Oregon in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Health Professions and Psychology, with a particular focus on General Health Professions and Clinical Psychology. Their work also touches on related subfields such as Health, Physiology, and Social Psychology.

The main topics addressed in Stoolmiller's research encompass Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes, Homelessness and Social Issues, Health disparities and outcomes, Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development, Child Abuse and Trauma, Smoking Behavior and Cessation, and Obesity, Physical Activity, and Diet.

Stoolmiller has published research results in several scholarly venues, including:

  • American Journal of Community Psychology
  • Nicotine & Tobacco Research
  • International Journal of Drug Policy
  • Journal of Ethnicity in Substance Abuse
  • Neurobiology of Stress

Among their recent scholarly papers are:

  • "Context Matters: Home-level But Not Individual-Level Recovery Social Capital Predicts Residents' Relapse" (2020) in American Journal of Community Psychology
  • "First E-Cigarette Flavor and Device Type Used: Associations With Vaping Persistence, Frequency, and Dependence in Young Adults" (2021) in Nicotine & Tobacco Research
  • "Network measures of advice-seeking and resource sharing are related to well-being in recovery homes" (2020) in International Journal of Drug Policy
  • "Personal and environmental social capital predictors of relapse following departure from recovery homes" (2021) in Drugs Education Prevention and Policy
  • "Advice seeking and loaning of money related to relapse in recovery homes" (2020) in Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Stoolmiller include:

  • John M. Light
  • Leonard A. Jason
  • Mayra Guerrero
  • Meghan Salomon-Amend
  • Ted J. Bobak

Best Publications

  • Family, School, and Behavioral Antecedents to Early Adolescent Involvement with Antisocial Peers.

    T. J. Dishion;G. R. Patterson;M. Stoolmiller;M. L. Skinner

  • Preventing conduct problems and improving school readiness: evaluation of the Incredible Years Teacher and Child Training Programs in high-risk schools

    Carolyn Webster-Stratton;M. Jamila Reid;Mike Stoolmiller

  • Variables that initiate and maintain an early-onset trajectory for juvenile offending.

    Gerald R. Patterson;Marion S. Forgatch;Karen L. Yoerger;Mike Stoolmiller

  • Progression to Traditional Cigarette Smoking After Electronic Cigarette Use Among US Adolescents and Young Adults

    Brian A. Primack;Samir Soneji;Michael Stoolmiller;Michael J. Fine

  • Description and immediate impacts of a preventive intervention for conduct problems.

    John B. Reid;J. Mark Eddy;Rebecca Ann Fetrow;Mike Stoolmiller

  • Predicting the timing of first sexual intercourse for at-risk adolescent males

    Deborah M. Capaldi;Lynn Crosby;Mike Stoolmiller

  • Co-occurrence of conduct problems and depressive symptoms in early adolescent boys: III. Prediction to young-adult adjustment.

    Deborah M. Capaldi;Mike Stoolmiller

  • Rigidity in Parent-Child Interactions and the Development of Externalizing and Internalizing Behavior in Early Childhood

    Tom Hollenstein;Isabela Granic;Mike Stoolmiller;James Snyder

  • Teaching Vocabulary During Shared Storybook Readings: An Examination of Differential Effects

    Michael D. Coyne;Deborah C. Simmons;Edward J. Kame'enui;Michael Stoolmiller

  • Effects of a therapeutic intervention for foster preschoolers on diurnal cortisol activity

    Philip A. Fisher;Mike Stoolmiller;Megan R. Gunnar;Bert O. Burraston

  • Who disrupts from placement in foster and kinship care

    Patricia Chamberlain;Joe M. Price;John B. Reid;John Landsverk

  • Aggression toward female partners by at-risk young men: the contribution of male adolescent friendships.

    Deborah M. Capaldi;Thomas J. Dishion;Mike Stoolmiller;Karen Yoerger

  • Alcohol use in motion pictures and its relation with early-onset teen drinking.

    James D Sargent;Thomas A Wills;Thomas A Wills;Mike Stoolmiller;Mike Stoolmiller;Jennifer J Gibson

  • Antisocial Behavior, Delinquent Peer Association, and Unsupervised Wandering for Boys: Growth and Change from Childhood to Early Adolescence.

    Mike Stoolmiller

  • Balancing Fidelity with Flexibility and Fit: What Do We Really Know about Fidelity of Implementation in Schools?

    Beth Harn;Danielle Parisi;Mike Stoolmiller

  • Replications of a Dual Failure Model for Boys' Depressed Mood.

    G. R. Patterson;Mike Stoolmiller

  • Detecting and describing preventive intervention effects in a universal school-based randomized trial targeting delinquent and violent behavior.

    Mike Stoolmiller;J. M. Eddy;J. B. Reid

  • Implications of the restricted range of family environments for estimates of heritability and nonshared environment in behavior-genetic adoption studies.

    Mike Stoolmiller

  • Heterosexual risk behaviors in at-risk young men from early adolescence to young adulthood: prevalence, prediction, and association with STD contraction.

    Deborah M. Capaldi;Mike Stoolmiller;Sara Clark;Lee D. Owen

  • Intervention effects on foster parent stress: associations with child cortisol levels.

    Philip A. Fisher;Mike Stoolmiller

  • Deviancy training and association with deviant peers in young children: ocurrence and contribution to early-onset conduct problems.

    James J. Snyder;Lynn M. Schrepferman;Jessica Oeser;Gerald R. Patterson

Frequent Co-Authors

James D. Sargent
James D. Sargent Dartmouth College
James J. Snyder
James J. Snyder Wichita State University
Frederick X. Gibbons
Frederick X. Gibbons University of Connecticut
Meg Gerrard
Meg Gerrard University of Connecticut
Gerald R. Patterson
Gerald R. Patterson Ball State University
Deborah M. Capaldi
Deborah M. Capaldi University of Oregon
Scott K. Baker
Scott K. Baker Southern Methodist University
Terry E. Duncan
Terry E. Duncan Oregon Research Institute
Thomas Ashby Wills
Thomas Ashby Wills University of Hawaii at Manoa
John B. Reid
John B. Reid University of Oregon

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA offers a range of online degree options that suit different career goals and areas of interest. Many students start with masters psychology online programs, which provide foundational knowledge valuable for a variety of roles and serve as a stepping stone to doctoral studies.

For those drawn to specialized practice and research, the best online psychology doctoral programs offer flexible pathways to earning a PhD or PsyD. These programs focus on advanced clinical skills, research methods, or academic careers in psychology.

Students interested in applied behavioral science may consider an online masters in applied behavior analysis. This degree prepares graduates for roles in behavioral therapy, autism treatment, and organizational behavior management.

If the brain and behavior fascinate you, neuropsychology doctoral programs online provide training in advanced neuroscience, assessment, and clinical neuropsychology.

No matter your pathway, online degrees can prepare you for careers in healthcare, education, research, or counseling. Explore each program to find the best fit for your aspirations.

Best Scientists Citing Mike Stoolmiller

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles