World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 35 9851 9220 5209 4757 121 5288

Emily M. Lund publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Emily M. Lund between 2010 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Emily M. Lund published across 16 years, from 2010 to 2025, averaging 9.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 23 publications in 2021. 12 of the 145 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2010 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 23. Peak 23 publications in 2021. 2010: 1 publication 2011: 5 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 12 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 14 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 13 publications 2021: 23 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 7 publications
2010 2025

145 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Emily M. Lund: publications per year, 2010 to 2025
Year Publications
2010 1
2011 5
2012 6
2013 3
2014 11
2015 12
2016 12
2017 14
2018 8
2019 8
2020 13
2021 23
2022 10
2023 7
2024 5
2025 7
Total 145
Download as CSV

Emily M. Lund publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Emily M. Lund sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 121–130 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 121 publications — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670 121
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Emily M. Lund D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Emily M. Lund sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 34–35 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671 35
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Emily M. Lund is affiliated with the University of Alabama in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of psychology, medicine, and social sciences with a focus on various subfields such as clinical psychology, social psychology, public health, environmental and occupational health, sociology and political science, and safety research.

Their work encompasses a range of topics, notably counseling practices and supervision, occupational therapy practice and research, family and disability support research, elder abuse and neglect, COVID-19 and mental health, disability education and employment, and resilience and mental health.

Notable recent papers include:

  • The COVID-19 pandemic, stress, and trauma in the disability community: A call to action., 2020, Rehabilitation Psychology
  • Creating Accessible Survey Instruments for Use with Autistic Adults and People with Intellectual Disability: Lessons Learned and Recommendations, 2020, Autism in Adulthood
  • Interpersonal violence against people with disabilities: Additional concerns and considerations in the COVID-19 pandemic., 2020, Rehabilitation Psychology
  • Sexual and Gender Minority Health Care Disparities, 2021, Primary Care Clinics in Office Practice
  • Even more to handle: Additional sources of stress and trauma for clients from marginalized racial and ethnic groups in the United States during the COVID-19 pandemic, 2020, Counselling Psychology Quarterly

Emily M. Lund frequently publishes in the following venues:

  • Rehabilitation Psychology
  • Training and Education in Professional Psychology
  • Psychological Trauma Theory Research Practice and Policy
  • Pediatric Research
  • Early Childhood Education Journal

Co-authorship collaborations have involved:

  • Lauren R. Khazem
  • Joy Gabrielli
  • Christopher R DeJesus
  • Cory J. Cascalheira
  • Ryan E Flinn

Best Publications

  • National Prevalence Rates of Bully Victimization Among Students With Disabilities in the United States

    Jamilia J. Blake;Emily M. Lund;Qiong Zhou;Oi-man Kwok

  • Meta-Analysis of PECS with Individuals with ASD: Investigation of Targeted versus Non-Targeted Outcomes, Participant Characteristics, and Implementation Phase.

    Jennifer B. Ganz;John L. Davis;Emily M. Lund;Fara D. Goodwyn

  • The COVID-19 pandemic, stress, and trauma in the disability community: A call to action.

    Emily M Lund;Anjali J Forber-Pratt;Catherine Wilson;Linda R Mona

  • Prevalence of interpersonal violence against community-living adults with disabilities: a literature review.

    Rosemary B. Hughes;Emily M. Lund;Joy Gabrielli;Laurie E. Powers

  • Bullying Perpetration, Victimization, and Demographic Differences in College Students: A Review of the Literature

    Unknown

  • Who self-identifies as disabled? An examination of impairment and contextual predictors.

    Unknown

  • Sexual and Gender Minority Health Care Disparities: Barriers to Care and Strategies to Bridge the Gap

    Emily M. Lund;Claire M. Burgess

  • A Systematic Review of the Empirical Support for Check-In Check-Out

    Unknown

  • Predictors of Bully Victimization in Students With Disabilities A Longitudinal Examination Using a National Data Set

    Jamilia J. Blake;Eun Sook Kim;Emily M. Lund;Qiong Zhou

  • Raising awareness of disabled lives and health care rationing during the COVID-19 pandemic.

    Emily M. Lund;Kara B. Ayers

  • Effects of peer-mediated implementation of visual scripts in middle school.

    Jennifer B. Ganz;Amy K. Heath;Emily M. Lund;Siglia P. H. Camargo

  • Delivering Home-Supported Applied Behavior Analysis Therapies to Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Families.

    Andrea Dennison;Emily M Lund;Matthew T Brodhead;Lilibeth Mejia

  • How we treat our own: The experiences and characteristics of psychology trainees with disabilities.

    Unknown

  • Providing culturally competent supervision to trainees with disabilities in rehabilitation settings.

    Unknown

  • School Counselors' and School Psychologists' Bullying Prevention and Intervention Strategies: A Look Into Real-World Practices

    Unknown

  • The relation of abuse to physical and psychological health in adults with developmental disabilities

    Rosemary B. Hughes;Susan Robinson-Whelen;Dora Raymaker;Emily M. Lund

  • The Role of Gender in Violence Experienced by Adults With Developmental Disabilities

    Laura Platt;Laurie Powers;Sandra Leotti;Rosemary B. Hughes

  • Development of a safety awareness group intervention for women with diverse disabilities: a pilot study.

    Rosemary B Hughes;Susan Robinson-Whelen;Alison C Pepper;Joy Gabrielli

  • Impacts of a PECS instructional coaching intervention on practitioners and children with autism

    Jennifer B. Ganz;Fara D. Goodwyn;Margot M. Boles;Ee Rea Hong

  • Guidelines to address barriers in clinical training for trainees with sensory disabilities.

    Jennifer G. Pearlstein;Adam T. Schmidt;Emily M. Lund;Lauren R. Khazem

  • A Safety Awareness Program for Women With Diverse Disabilities A Randomized Controlled Trial

    Susan Robinson-Whelen;Rosemary B. Hughes;Joy Gabrielli;Emily M. Lund

  • Development of an audio-computer assisted self-interview to investigate violence and health in the lives of adults with developmental disabilities

    Mary Oschwald;Sandy Leotti;Dora Raymaker;Dora Raymaker;Marsha Katz

  • Acute-on-chronic stress in the time of COVID-19: assessment considerations for vulnerable youth populations.

    Joy Gabrielli;Emily Lund

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael R. Nadorff
Michael R. Nadorff Mississippi State University
Lisa A. Brenner
Lisa A. Brenner University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
Christina Nicolaidis
Christina Nicolaidis Portland State University
Laurie E. Powers
Laurie E. Powers Portland State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in Psychology opens doors to a wide range of meaningful careers. Many students pursue online degrees in psychology or related fields to gain flexibility while developing in-demand skills. Key career paths include becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA), as well as various types of social work.

If you are interested in working as a behavior analyst, learn more about becoming a bcba in Wyoming, which outlines required education, supervised experience, and licensing steps. Social work is another common path for psychology graduates, and requirements differ by state. Those interested in supporting individuals and communities can explore the steps for becoming a social worker in Alabama, or review Alaska social work license requirements for a northern perspective.

Opportunities also abound in the southwest, and you can discover the requirements to be a social worker in Arizona. With online study options and diverse career pathways, studying psychology in the USA continues to be an excellent choice for those seeking impact and flexibility.

Best Scientists Citing Emily M. Lund

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles