World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

Michael J. Cheadle publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael J. Cheadle sits on this spectrum.

38–42 publications: 1 scientists 43–47 publications: 0 scientists 48–52 publications: 3 scientists 53–57 publications: 8 scientists 58–62 publications: 11 scientists 63–67 publications: 16 scientists 68–72 publications: 24 scientists 73–77 publications: 31 scientists 78–82 publications: 49 scientists 83–87 publications: 77 scientists 88–92 publications: 86 scientists 93–97 publications: 88 scientists 98–102 publications: 92 scientists 103–107 publications: 84 scientists 108–112 publications: 102 scientists 113–117 publications: 108 scientists 118–122 publications: 117 scientists 123–127 publications: 126 scientists 128–132 publications: 146 scientists 133–137 publications: 114 scientists 138–142 publications: 102 scientists 143–147 publications: 127 scientists 148–152 publications: 102 scientists 153–157 publications: 112 scientists 158–162 publications: 102 scientists 163–167 publications: 127 scientists 168–172 publications: 121 scientists 173–177 publications: 112 scientists 178–182 publications: 109 scientists 183–187 publications: 98 scientists 188–192 publications: 92 scientists 193–197 publications: 105 scientists 198–202 publications: 77 scientists 203–207 publications: 80 scientists 208–212 publications: 89 scientists 213–217 publications: 70 scientists 218–222 publications: 74 scientists 223–227 publications: 74 scientists 228–232 publications: 70 scientists 233–237 publications: 67 scientists 238–242 publications: 59 scientists 243–247 publications: 67 scientists 248–252 publications: 51 scientists 253–257 publications: 46 scientists 258–262 publications: 41 scientists 263–267 publications: 39 scientists 268–272 publications: 34 scientists 273–277 publications: 39 scientists 278–282 publications: 35 scientists 283–287 publications: 36 scientists 288–292 publications: 35 scientists 293–297 publications: 29 scientists 298–302 publications: 23 scientists 303–307 publications: 39 scientists 308–312 publications: 34 scientists 313–317 publications: 23 scientists 318–322 publications: 18 scientists 323–327 publications: 18 scientists 328–332 publications: 21 scientists 333–337 publications: 20 scientists 338–342 publications: 15 scientists 343–347 publications: 13 scientists 348–352 publications: 24 scientists 353–357 publications: 25 scientists 358–362 publications: 10 scientists 363–367 publications: 20 scientists 368–372 publications: 17 scientists 373–377 publications: 18 scientists 378–382 publications: 15 scientists 383–387 publications: 7 scientists 388–392 publications: 22 scientists 393–397 publications: 9 scientists 398–402 publications: 11 scientists 403–407 publications: 16 scientists 408–412 publications: 4 scientists 413–417 publications: 5 scientists 418–422 publications: 14 scientists 423–427 publications: 8 scientists 428–432 publications: 7 scientists 433–437 publications: 7 scientists 438–442 publications: 10 scientists 443–447 publications: 10 scientists 448–452 publications: 3 scientists 453–457 publications: 9 scientists 458–462 publications: 11 scientists 463–467 publications: 4 scientists 468–472 publications: 6 scientists 473–477 publications: 11 scientists 478–482 publications: 8 scientists 483–487 publications: 2 scientists 488–492 publications: 3 scientists 493–497 publications: 4 scientists 498–502 publications: 4 scientists 503–507 publications: 4 scientists 508–509 publications: 4 scientists 510+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 510+

The last bar groups every scientist with 510 publications or more.

Michael J. Cheadle D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael J. Cheadle sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 15 scientists 31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32 D-Index: 60 scientists 33 D-Index: 90 scientists 34 D-Index: 103 scientists 35 D-Index: 108 scientists 36 D-Index: 142 scientists 37 D-Index: 147 scientists 38 D-Index: 147 scientists 39 D-Index: 152 scientists 40 D-Index: 143 scientists 41 D-Index: 157 scientists 42 D-Index: 141 scientists 43 D-Index: 151 scientists 44 D-Index: 140 scientists 45 D-Index: 135 scientists 46 D-Index: 121 scientists 47 D-Index: 108 scientists 48 D-Index: 128 scientists 49 D-Index: 111 scientists 50 D-Index: 106 scientists 51 D-Index: 112 scientists 52 D-Index: 102 scientists 53 D-Index: 103 scientists 54 D-Index: 94 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 101 scientists 57 D-Index: 71 scientists 58 D-Index: 65 scientists 59 D-Index: 78 scientists 60 D-Index: 93 scientists 61 D-Index: 56 scientists 62 D-Index: 58 scientists 63 D-Index: 52 scientists 64 D-Index: 63 scientists 65 D-Index: 49 scientists 66 D-Index: 53 scientists 67 D-Index: 57 scientists 68 D-Index: 50 scientists 69 D-Index: 44 scientists 70 D-Index: 44 scientists 71 D-Index: 31 scientists 72 D-Index: 33 scientists 73 D-Index: 33 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 32 scientists 76 D-Index: 24 scientists 77 D-Index: 17 scientists 78 D-Index: 19 scientists 79 D-Index: 9 scientists 80 D-Index: 21 scientists 81 D-Index: 20 scientists 82 D-Index: 17 scientists 83 D-Index: 19 scientists 84 D-Index: 19 scientists 85 D-Index: 14 scientists 86 D-Index: 6 scientists 87 D-Index: 14 scientists 88 D-Index: 17 scientists 89 D-Index: 10 scientists 90 D-Index: 8 scientists 91 D-Index: 8 scientists 92 D-Index: 9 scientists 93 D-Index: 6 scientists 94+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 94+

The last bar groups every scientist with 94 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michael J. Cheadle is affiliated with the University of Wyoming in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields with a strong focus on Earth and Planetary Sciences and Engineering. The scientist has contributed significantly to subfields including Geophysics, Ocean Engineering, Environmental Chemistry, Molecular Biology, and Oceanography.

Cheadle's main areas of work involve drilling and well engineering, methane hydrates and related phenomena, seismic imaging and inversion techniques, geological and geochemical analysis, geomagnetism and paleomagnetism studies, offshore engineering and technologies, and geological and geophysical studies.

Their publication record includes papers in various noted academic venues. Recent publications include:

  • Topology optimization, additive manufacturing and thermohydraulic testing of heat sinks (2024) - International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer
  • Three-dimensional magnetic stripes require slow cooling in fast-spread lower ocean crust (2021) - Nature
  • Tectonic termination of oceanic detachment faults, with constraints on tectonic uplift and mass wasting related erosion rates (2022) - Earth and Planetary Science Letters
  • Magnetic Structure of Fast-Spread Oceanic Crust at Pito Deep (2020) - Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems
  • Making Use of Relicts: Brisingid Seastars Aggregate on Hydrothermally Inactive Sulfide Chimneys Near Black Smokers (2022) - Frontiers in Marine Science

The scientist frequently collaborates with other researchers. Regular co-authors include Barbara E. John, H. J. Dick, Natsue Abe, Benoît Ildefonse, and J. S. Gee.

Cheadle publishes often in the following venues:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • OPAL (Open@LaTrobe) (La Trobe University)
  • Abstracts with programs - Geological Society of America
  • International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer
  • Nature

The scope of Cheadle's work covers both theoretical and applied domains, addressing complex challenges in oceanic crust formation, tectonics, and engineering processes relevant to both natural systems and technological applications.

Best Publications

  • Trace element chemistry of zircons from oceanic crust: A method for distinguishing detrital zircon provenance

    Craig B. Grimes;Barbara E. John;P.B. Kelemen;F.K. Mazdab

  • Temperatures in Ambient Mantle and Plumes: Constraints from Basalts, Picrites, and Komatiites

    C. Herzberg;P.D. Asimow;Nicholas Arndt;Y. Niu

  • “Fingerprinting” tectono-magmatic provenance using trace elements in igneous zircon

    C. B. Grimes;J. L. Wooden;M. J. Cheadle;B. E. John

  • Constraining the potential temperature of the Archaean mantle: A review of the evidence from komatiites

    E.G. Nisbet;M.J. Cheadle;N.T. Arndt;M.J. Bickle

  • On the occurrence, trace element geochemistry, and crystallization history of zircon from in situ ocean lithosphere

    Craig B. Grimes;Craig B. Grimes;Barbara E. John;Michael J. Cheadle;Frank K. Mazdab

  • Quantifying the Building Blocks of Igneous Rocks: Are Clustered Crystal Frameworks the Foundation?

    Dougal A. Jerram;Michael J. Cheadle;Anthony R. Philpotts

  • Were komatiites wet

    N Arndt;C Ginibre;C Chauvel;F Albarede

  • Deep Reflections from the Caledonides and Variscides West of Britain and Comparison with the Himalayas

    Drummond H. Matthews;Michael J. Cheadle

  • Protracted construction of gabbroic crust at a slow spreading ridge: Constraints from 206Pb/238U zircon ages from Atlantis Massif and IODP Hole U1309D (30°N, MAR)

    Craig B. Grimes;Barbara E. John;Michael J. Cheadle;Joseph L. Wooden

  • Deep seismic reflection profiling between England, France and Ireland

    M. Cheadle;D. Matthews;S. McGeary;M. Warner

  • The spatial distribution of grains and crystals in rocks

    D. A. Jerram;Michael J. Cheadle;Robert H. Hunter;Michael T. Elliott

  • Uniquely fresh 2.7 Ga komatiites from the Belingwe greenstone belt, Zimbabwe

    E. G. Nisbet;N. T. Arndt;M. J. Bickle;W. E. Cameron

  • Extensional structures on the western UK continental shelf: a review of evidence from deep seismic profiling

    M. J. Cheadle;S. McGeary;M. R. Warner;D. H. Matthews

  • Primitive layered gabbros from fast-spreading lower oceanic crust

    Kathryn M. Gillis;Jonathan E. Snow;Adam Klaus;Natsue Abe

  • Peridotite sills and metasomatic gabbros in the Eastern Layered Series of the Rhum complex

    J. H. Bédard;R. S. J. Sparks;R. Renner;M. J. Cheadle

  • Quantitative Modeling of Granitic Melt Generation and Segregation in the Continental Crust

    Matthew D. Jackson;Michael J. Cheadle;Michael P. Atherton

  • Crustal Profile of Mountain Belt: COCORP Deep Seismic Reflection Profiling in New England Appalachians and Implications for Architecture of Convergent Mountain Chains

    C. J. Ando;B. L. Czuchra;Simon L. Klemperer;Larry D. Brown

  • Early Tertiary plume uplift of the North Sea and Faeroe-Shetland Basins

    P.A. Nadin;N.J. Kusznir;M.J. Cheadle

  • The deep crustal structure of the Mojave Desert, California, from Cocorp seismic reflection data

    M. J. Cheadle;B. L. Czuchra;T. Byrne;C. J. Ando

  • Determining the cooling history of in situ lower oceanic crust—Atlantis Bank, SW Indian Ridge

    Barbara E John;David A Foster;John M Murphy;Michael J Cheadle

  • On the Use of Changes in Dihedral Angle to Decode Late-stage Textural Evolution in Cumulates

    Marian B. Holness;Michael J. Cheadle;Dan McKENZIE

Frequent Co-Authors

Barbara E. John
Barbara E. John University of Wyoming
Jeffrey S. Gee
Jeffrey S. Gee University of California, San Diego
Peter B. Kelemen
Peter B. Kelemen Columbia University
Benoit Ildefonse
Benoit Ildefonse University of Montpellier
Maurice A. Tivey
Maurice A. Tivey Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution
Christopher J. MacLeod
Christopher J. MacLeod Cardiff University
Joseph L. Wooden
Joseph L. Wooden Stanford University
Georges Ceuleneer
Georges Ceuleneer Federal University of Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées
Mark A. Kendrick
Mark A. Kendrick Australian National University
Chuan-Zhou Liu
Chuan-Zhou Liu Chinese Academy of Sciences

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Earth Science opens doors to various related fields that benefit from specialized knowledge. For professionals aiming to enhance management skills within scientific organizations, pursuing an online masters in human resource management can provide valuable leadership and strategic capabilities.

Additionally, Earth Science studies are accessible for learners of all ages. Many seniors find that enrolling in some of the best degrees for older adults offers flexible, engaging options to transition into new careers or personal enrichment, including environmental and geological disciplines.

For those interested in organizing, preserving, and managing scientific information, programs like the ALA accredited MLS programs provide specialized training. These degrees support roles that bridge Earth Science with information science, ensuring critical research is accessible.

Considering whether to pursue advanced studies, many wonder is a masters in library science worth it. For Earth Science students, adding this degree can expand career pathways into data curation, research support, and education, complementing scientific expertise with vital information management skills.

Best Scientists Citing Michael J. Cheadle

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles