What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Basalt
- Igneous rock
- Paleontology
The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Mid-ocean ridge, Ophiolite, Geochemistry, Diapir and Mantle.
His Mid-ocean ridge study is related to the wider topic of Seismology.
His research investigates the connection between Seismology and topics such as Petrology that intersect with problems in Shear zone.
Chromitite and Cumulate rock is closely connected to Pargasite in his research, which is encompassed under the umbrella topic of Geochemistry.
Georges Ceuleneer works mostly in the field of Diapir, limiting it down to topics relating to Peridotite and, in certain cases, Structural mapping.
His studies in Mantle integrate themes in fields like Sheeted dyke complex and Gabbro.
His most cited work include:
- Shear zones, thrusts and related magmatism in the Oman ophiolite: Initiation of thrusting on an oceanic ridge (235 citations)
- Mantle flow patterns at an oceanic spreading centre: The Oman peridotites record (166 citations)
- Structural mapping in the Oman ophiolites: Mantle diapirism along an oceanic ridge (120 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
Georges Ceuleneer mostly deals with Geochemistry, Mantle, Ophiolite, Crust and Peridotite.
His studies deal with areas such as Hydrothermal circulation, Lithosphere, Petrology, Mineralogy and Massif as well as Mantle.
The various areas that Georges Ceuleneer examines in his Ophiolite study include Mid-ocean ridge, Transition zone, Gabbro, Oceanic crust and Diapir.
Georges Ceuleneer interconnects Sheeted dyke complex, Fracture zone and Shear zone in the investigation of issues within Mid-ocean ridge.
His Peridotite research includes themes of Partial melting and Incompatible element.
His research integrates issues of Pargasite and Plagioclase in his study of Olivine.
He most often published in these fields:
- Geochemistry (63.64%)
- Mantle (48.76%)
- Ophiolite (44.63%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2016-2021)?
- Geochemistry (63.64%)
- Mantle (48.76%)
- Ophiolite (44.63%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
His primary scientific interests are in Geochemistry, Mantle, Ophiolite, Transition zone and Basalt.
His Geochemistry study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Chromitite and Amphibole.
His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Massif, Transform fault, Tectonics and Crust.
His Ophiolite research includes elements of Metasomatism, Igneous rock and Oceanic crust.
The study incorporates disciplines such as Diapir and Chromite in addition to Transition zone.
Georges Ceuleneer focuses mostly in the field of Basalt, narrowing it down to matters related to Continental crust and, in some cases, Plate tectonics and Asthenosphere.
Between 2016 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- Origin of the dunitic mantle-crust transition zone in the Oman ophiolite: The interplay between percolating magmas and high-temperature hydrous fluids (20 citations)
- The Eastern Makran Ophiolite (SE Iran): evidence for a Late Cretaceous fore-arc oceanic crust (15 citations)
- Extreme geochemical variability through the dunitic transition zone of the Oman ophiolite: Implications for melt/fluid-rock reactions at Moho level beneath oceanic spreading centers (14 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Basalt
- Igneous rock
- Paleontology
His scientific interests lie mostly in Geochemistry, Ophiolite, Chromite, Transition zone and Mantle.
Geochemistry is often connected to Amphibole in his work.
His studies deal with areas such as Mineral chemistry, Oceanic crust and Cretaceous as well as Ophiolite.
The study incorporates disciplines such as Pargasite, Diapir and Olivine in addition to Chromite.
His Diapir research incorporates elements of Basalt and Crust.
His work in the fields of Mantle, such as Peridotite, intersects with other areas such as Dislocation creep.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
