World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Melissa P. Sulprizio

Melissa P. Sulprizio

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
51
Citations
11231
World Ranking
4692
National Ranking
1733

Melissa P. Sulprizio publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Melissa P. Sulprizio sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 256 publications — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Melissa P. Sulprizio D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Melissa P. Sulprizio sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Global mortality from outdoor fine particle pollution generated by fossil fuel combustion: Results from GEOS-Chem.

    Karn Vohra;Alina Vodonos;Joel Schwartz;Eloise A. Marais

  • Why do models overestimate surface ozone in the Southeast United States

    Katherine R. Travis;Daniel J. Jacob;Jenny A. Fisher;Patrick S. Kim

  • Quantifying methane emissions from the largest oil-producing basin in the United States from space

    Yuzhong Zhang;Ritesh Gautam;Sudhanshu Pandey;Mark Omara

  • Public health impacts of the severe haze in Equatorial Asia in September–October 2015: demonstration of a new framework for informing fire management strategies to reduce downwind smoke exposure

    Shannon N Koplitz;Loretta J Mickley;Miriam E Marlier;Jonathan J Buonocore

  • Ozone pollution in the North China Plain spreading into the late-winter haze season.

    Ke Li;Daniel J. Jacob;Hong Liao;Yulu Qiu

  • Atmospheric peroxyacetyl nitrate (PAN): a global budget and source attribution

    E. V. Fischer;Daniel James Jacob;Robert M. Yantosca;Melissa Payer Sulprizio

  • The role of chlorine in global tropospheric chemistry

    Xuan Wang;Daniel J. Jacob;Sebastian D. Eastham;Melissa P. Sulprizio

  • Particulate Air Pollution from Wildfires in the Western US under Climate Change.

    Jia Coco Liu;Loretta J. Mickley;Melissa P. Sulprizio;Francesca Dominici

  • Gridded National Inventory of U.S. Methane Emissions

    Joannes D. Maasakkers;Daniel J. Jacob;Melissa P. Sulprizio;Alexander J. Turner

  • Wildfire-specific Fine Particulate Matter and Risk of Hospital Admissions in Urban and Rural Counties.

    Jia Coco Liu;Ander Wilson;Loretta J. Mickley;Francesca Dominici

  • Sources, seasonality, and trends of southeast US aerosol: an integrated analysis of surface, aircraft, and satellite observations with the GEOS-Chem chemical transport model

    P S Kim;Daniel J Jacob;Jenny A Fisher;K Travis

  • Global distribution of methane emissions, emission trends, and OH concentrations and trends inferred from an inversion of GOSAT satellite data for 2010–2015

    Joannes D. Maasakkers;Joannes D. Maasakkers;Daniel J. Jacob;Melissa P. Sulprizio;Tia R. Scarpelli

  • Organic nitrate chemistry and its implications for nitrogen budgets in an isoprene- and monoterpene-rich atmosphere: constraints from aircraft (SEAC 4 RS) and ground-based (SOAS) observations in the Southeast US

    Jenny A. Fisher;Daniel J. Jacob;Katherine R. Travis;Patrick S. Kim

  • Satellite-based survey of extreme methane emissions in the Permian basin

    Itziar Irakulis-Loitxate;Luis Guanter;Yin-Nian Liu;Daniel J. Varon

  • An Ensemble Learning Approach for Estimating High Spatiotemporal Resolution of Ground-Level Ozone in the Contiguous United States.

    Weeberb J. Requia;Qian Di;Qian Di;Rachel Silvern;James T. Kelly

  • Quantifying the influence of agricultural fires in northwest India on urban air pollution in Delhi, India

    Daniel H. Cusworth;Loretta J. Mickley;Melissa P. Sulprizio;Tianjia Liu

  • Burden of Disease from Rising Coal-Fired Power Plant Emissions in Southeast Asia.

    Shannon N. Koplitz;Daniel J. Jacob;Melissa P. Sulprizio;Lauri Myllyvirta

  • Global distribution of methane emissions: a comparative inverse analysis of observations from the TROPOMI and GOSAT satellite instruments

    Zhen Qu;Daniel J. Jacob;Lu Shen;Xiao Lu

  • Using satellite observations of tropospheric NO 2 columns to infer long-term trends in US NO x emissions: the importance of accounting for the free tropospheric NO 2 background

    Rachel F. Silvern;Daniel J. Jacob;Loretta J. Mickley;Melissa P. Sulprizio

  • Global methane budget and trend, 2010–2017: complementarity of inverse analyses using in situ (GLOBALVIEWplus CH 4 ObsPack) and satellite (GOSAT) observations

    Xiao Lu;Daniel J. Jacob;Yuzhong Zhang;Yuzhong Zhang;Joannes D. Maasakkers

Frequent Co-Authors

Daniel J. Jacob
Daniel J. Jacob Harvard University
Joannes D. Maasakkers
Joannes D. Maasakkers Netherlands Institute for Space Research
Robert M. Yantosca
Robert M. Yantosca Harvard University
Loretta J. Mickley
Loretta J. Mickley Harvard University
Robert J. Parker
Robert J. Parker University of Leicester
Francesca Dominici
Francesca Dominici Harvard University
Michelle L. Bell
Michelle L. Bell Yale University
Randall V. Martin
Randall V. Martin Washington University in St. Louis
Paul O. Wennberg
Paul O. Wennberg California Institute of Technology
Jack E. Dibb
Jack E. Dibb University of New Hampshire

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career pathways. Environmental challenges require multidisciplinary knowledge, and programs like the online geoscience degree offer specialized training in earth systems, which is highly relevant for careers in environmental consulting and resource management.

Some may seek a more flexible or affordable route. The most affordable online general studies degree programs allow students to customize their curriculum with environmental topics while keeping costs low. This approach can be ideal for those balancing work and study.

For advanced social impact roles, pursuing a Doctorate of Social Work might complement Environmental Science expertise by addressing community and policy issues. Programs ranked among the cheapest online dsw programs give access to affordable, flexible doctoral studies that can enhance leadership skills in environmental advocacy and planning.

Students unsure about their choice may wonder about the what's the easiest bachelor's degree to get. While ease varies by interest and aptitude, combining environmental science with accessible programs can balance academic rigor and timely graduation, helping learners progress efficiently toward their career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Melissa P. Sulprizio

Recently Published Articles