World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
111
Citations
85401
World Ranking
5222
National Ranking
2820

Matthew H. Liang publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew H. Liang sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 367 publications — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Matthew H. Liang D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew H. Liang sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 111 D-Index — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Matthew H. Liang is affiliated with Brigham and Women's Hospital in the United States. Their primary field of research lies in Medicine, with a notable focus on Psychiatry and Mental Health, Infectious Diseases, Parasitology, Rheumatology, and Pharmacology.

Their scholarly work extensively addresses several topics, including:

  • Vector-borne infectious diseases
  • Dermatological diseases and infestations
  • Psychosomatic disorders and their treatments
  • Bipolar disorder and treatment
  • Viral infections and vectors
  • Suicide and self-harm studies
  • Mental health treatment and access

Frequent co-authors in their research include:

  • Paul M. Lantos
  • Jeffrey A. Rumbaugh
  • Linda K. Bockenstedt
  • Yngve Falck-Ytter
  • Maria E. Aguero-Rosenfeld

Their research contributions have appeared in several publication venues, most notably:

  • JAMA Psychiatry
  • Arthritis & Rheumatology
  • Clinical Infectious Diseases
  • Arthritis Care & Research
  • Neurology

Representative papers authored or co-authored by Matthew H. Liang include:

  • Clinical Practice Guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), American Academy of Neurology (AAN), and American College of Rheumatology (ACR): 2020 Guidelines for the Prevention, Diagnosis and Treatment of Lyme Disease, 2020, Clinical Infectious Diseases
  • Clinical Practice Guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), American Academy of Neurology (AAN), and American College of Rheumatology (ACR): 2020 Guidelines for the Prevention, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Lyme Disease, 2020, Arthritis Care & Research
  • Lithium Treatment in the Prevention of Repeat Suicide-Related Outcomes in Veterans With Major Depression or Bipolar Disorder, 2021, JAMA Psychiatry
  • Clinical Practice Guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), American Academy of Neurology (AAN), and American College of Rheumatology (ACR): 2020 Guidelines for the Prevention, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Lyme Disease, 2020, Arthritis & Rheumatology
  • Clinical Practice Guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America, American Academy of Neurology, and American College of Rheumatology, 2020, Neurology

Best Publications

  • The American Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis.

    Frank C. Arnett;Steven M. Edworthy;Daniel A. Bloch;Dennis J. Mcshane

  • Derivation of the SLEDAI. A disease activity index for lupus patients. The Committee on Prognosis Studies in SLE.

    C. Bombardier;D. D. Gladman;M. B. Urowitz;D. Caron

  • Estimates of the prevalence of arthritis and selected musculoskeletal disorders in the United States

    Reva C. Lawrence;Charles G. Helmick;Frank C. Arnett;Richard A. Deyo

  • The development and initial validation of the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology damage index for systemic lupus erythematosus.

    Dafna Gladman;Ellen Ginzler;Charles Goldsmith;Paul Fortin

  • The American College of Rheumatology nomenclature and case definitions for neuropsychiatric lupus syndromes

    Matthew H. Liang;Michael Corzillius;Sang Cheol Bae;Robert A. Lew

  • The Self-Administered Comorbidity Questionnaire: a new method to assess comorbidity for clinical and health services research.

    Oliver Sangha;Gerold Stucki;Matthew H. Liang;Anne H. Fossel

  • 2017 European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology classification criteria for adult and juvenile idiopathic inflammatory myopathies and their major subgroups

    Ingrid E Lundberg;Anna Tjärnlund;Matteo Bottai;Victoria P Werth

  • Comparisons of five health status instruments for orthopedic evaluation.

    Matthew H. Liang;Anne H. Fossel;Martin G. Larson

  • Reliability and validity of six systems for the clinical assessment of disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus

    Matthew H. Liang;Steven A. Socher;Martin G. Larson;Peter H. Schur

  • 2017 European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology Classification Criteria for Adult and Juvenile Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathies and Their Major Subgroups.

    Ingrid E Lundberg;Anna Tjärnlund;Matteo Bottai;Victoria P Werth

  • Outcomes of total hip and knee replacement: preoperative functional status predicts outcomes at six months after surgery.

    Paul R. Fortin;Ann E. Clarke;Lawrence Joseph;Matthew H. Liang

  • The importance of patient expectations in predicting functional outcomes after total joint arthroplasty.

    Nizar N Mahomed;Matthew H Liang;Earl F Cook;Lawren H Daltroy

  • Anticardiolipin Antibodies and the Risk for Ischemic Stroke and Venous Thrombosis

    Katherine S. Ginsburg;Matthew H. Liang;Laura Newcomer;Samuel Z. Goldhaber

  • Comparative measurement efficiency and sensitivity of five health status instruments for arthritis research

    Matthew H. Liang;Matthew H. Liang;Martin G. Larson;Karen E. Cullen;Julie A. Schwartz

  • The POSNA pediatric musculoskeletal functional health questionnaire: report on reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. Pediatric Outcomes Instrument Development Group. Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America.

    Lawren H. Daltroy;Matthew H. Liang;Anne H. Fossel;Michael J. Goldberg

  • Comparative measurement sensitivity of short and longer health status instruments.

    Jeffrey N. Katz;Martin G. Larson;Charlotte B. Phillips;Anne H. Fossel

  • Long-term impact of early treatment on radiographic progression in rheumatoid arthritis: A meta-analysis.

    Axel Finckh;Matthew H. Liang;Carmen Mugica van Herckenrode;Paola de Pablo

  • The North American spine society lumbar spine outcome assessment Instrument: reliability and validity tests.

    Lawren H. Daltroy;William L. Cats-Baril;Jeffrey N. Katz;Anne H. Fossel

  • Measurement properties of a self-administered outcome measure in lumbar spinal stenosis.

    Gerold Stucki;Lawren Daltroy;Matthew H. Liang;Steven J. Lipson

  • Standard grading system for rosacea: report of the National Rosacea Society Expert Committee on the classification and staging of rosacea.

    Jonathan Wilkin;Mark Dahl;Michael Detmar;Lynn Drake

Frequent Co-Authors

Jeffrey N. Katz
Jeffrey N. Katz Brigham and Women's Hospital
Robert A. Lew
Robert A. Lew Boston University
Elizabeth W. Karlson
Elizabeth W. Karlson Brigham and Women's Hospital
Paul R. Fortin
Paul R. Fortin Université Laval
Peter H. Schur
Peter H. Schur Brigham and Women's Hospital
Gerold Stucki
Gerold Stucki University of Lucerne
Karen H. Costenbader
Karen H. Costenbader Brigham and Women's Hospital
Ronald G. Tompkins
Ronald G. Tompkins Harvard University
Graham A. Colditz
Graham A. Colditz Washington University in St. Louis
Frederick W. Miller
Frederick W. Miller National Institutes of Health

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medicine as a career offers several online pathways for students with varied backgrounds. For those already holding an RN license, rn to bsn online programs are a cost-effective way to earn a Bachelor of Science in Nursing while balancing work and family commitments.

If you hold a bachelor’s degree in a non-nursing field, entry level msn programs online allow you to directly pursue a master’s in nursing without a prior nursing credential, making it possible to transition into advanced practice roles.

Those new to healthcare may consider starting with online adn programs for non nurses, which lead to an Associate Degree in Nursing and open doors to entry-level nursing positions.

Alternatively, those interested in the administrative side of healthcare can look into medical billing and coding schools online to gain in-demand skills supporting healthcare operations.

Each pathway offers unique career options, flexibility, and entry points to the growing and rewarding medical field.

Best Scientists Citing Matthew H. Liang

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles