World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
82
Citations
23769
World Ranking
1336
National Ranking
58

Mark Creamer publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Creamer sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 231 publications — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Mark Creamer D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Creamer sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 82 D-Index — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark Creamer is affiliated with the University of Melbourne in Australia, focusing on research within psychology, particularly clinical psychology. Their scholarly contributions span various interconnected topics including posttraumatic stress disorder research, migration, health and trauma, disaster response and management, grief, bereavement and mental health, family support in illness, traumatic brain injury research, and trauma and emergency care studies.

Recent publications authored or co-authored by Creamer reflect these thematic interests. These include:

  • "An Open Label Pilot Study of a Brief Psychosocial Intervention for Disaster and Trauma Survivors" (2020), published in Frontiers in Psychiatry
  • "Prolonged grief in refugees, parenting behaviour and children's mental health" (2020), published in Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry
  • "The Lingering Impact of Resolved PTSD on Subsequent Functioning" (2023), published in FOCUS The Journal of Lifelong Learning in Psychiatry
  • "Mental health, operational stress, and organizational stress among sworn and unsworn police personnel." (2022), published in Traumatology An International Journal
  • "Harnessing psychedelics for treating posttraumatic stress disorder: Does the science support all the hype?" (2025), published in Journal of Traumatic Stress

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Creamer include:

  • Richard A. Bryant
  • David Forbes
  • Meaghan O'Donnell
  • Alexander C. McFarlane
  • Andrea Phelps

Their work has appeared in multiple academic venues, notably:

  • Frontiers in Psychiatry
  • Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry
  • FOCUS The Journal of Lifelong Learning in Psychiatry
  • Traumatology An International Journal
  • Journal of Traumatic Stress

Mark Creamer's research systematically addresses the psychological effects of trauma and stress, often exploring the mechanisms and outcomes of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and grief, especially among vulnerable populations such as refugees and emergency service personnel. The research extends to studying the organizational and operational stress experienced by police personnel and investigating potential novel treatments for PTSD, including the emerging field of psychedelic therapy.

Their academic profile is marked by integration across several subfields of study:

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Emergency Medical Services
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Epidemiology
  • Emergency Medicine

This multidisciplinary approach supports a broad understanding of trauma-related mental health issues from both clinical and social perspectives, shaped by collaborations with specialists across psychology and psychiatry fields. The ongoing study of complex trauma and its treatment reflects Creamer's engagement with current debates and research frontiers in mental health care.

Best Publications

  • Psychometric properties of the Impact of Event Scale - Revised.

    Mark Creamer;Richard Bell;Salvina Failla

  • Post-traumatic stress disorder: findings from the Australian National Survey of Mental Health and Well-being.

    Mark Creamer;P. Burgess;A. C. McFarlane

  • The Psychiatric Sequelae of Traumatic Injury

    Richard A. Bryant;Meaghan L. O'Donnell;Mark Creamer;Alexander C. McFarlane

  • Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Depression Following Trauma: Understanding Comorbidity

    Meaghan L. O’Donnell;Mark Creamer;Phillipa Pattison

  • Reaction to trauma: a cognitive processing model.

    Mark Creamer;Philip Burgess;Phillipa Pattison

  • The validity of the PTSD checklist as a measure of symptomatic change in combat-related PTSD.

    David Forbes;Mark Creamer;Dirk Biddle

  • The Beck Anxiety Inventory in a non-clinical sample.

    Mark Creamer;James Foran;Richard C. Bell

  • Lifetime Prevalence of Gender-Based Violence in Women and the Relationship With Mental Disorders and Psychosocial Function

    Susan Rees;Derrick Silove;Tien Chey;Lorraine Ivancic

  • The Treatment of Anxiety Disorders: Clinician's Guide and Patient Manuals

    Gavin Andrews;Mark Creamer;Rocco D Crino;Caroline Hunt

  • A guide to guidelines for the treatment of PTSD and related conditions

    David Forbes;Mark Creamer;Jonathan Ian Bisson;Judith A. Cohen

  • Psychiatric Morbidity Following Injury

    Meaghan L. O'donnell;Mark C. Creamer;Phillipa Pattison;Christopher Atkin

  • Acute and Chronic Posttraumatic Stress Symptoms in the Emergence of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: A Network Analysis

    Richard A Bryant;Mark Creamer;Meaghan O'Donnell;David Forbes

  • Sleep Disturbance Immediately Prior to Trauma Predicts Subsequent Psychiatric Disorder

    Richard A. Bryant;Mark Creamer;Meaghan O'Donnell;Derrick Silove

  • Posttraumatic disorders following injury: an empirical and methodological review.

    Meaghan L. O'Donnell;Mark Creamer;Richard A. Bryant;Ulrich Schnyder

  • A study of the protective function of acute morphine administration on subsequent posttraumatic stress disorder.

    Richard A. Bryant;Mark Creamer;Meaghan O'Donnell;Derrick Silove

  • A Randomized Controlled Trial of Exposure Therapy and Cognitive Restructuring for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder

    Richard A. Bryant;Michelle L. Moulds;Rachel M. Guthrie;Suzanne T. Dang

  • Trajectory of post-traumatic stress following traumatic injury: 6-year follow-up

    Richard A Bryant;Angela Nickerson;Mark Creamer;Meaghan O'Donnell

  • Psychopathology following trauma: The role of subjective experience

    Mark Creamer;Alexander C. McFarlane;Philip M. Burgess

  • Australian guidelines for the treatment of adults with acute stress disorder and post-traumatic stress disorder.

    David Forbes;Mark C. Creamer;Andrea J. Phelps;Richard Bryant

  • Do all psychological treatments really work the same in posttraumatic stress disorder

    Anke Ehlers;Jonathan Ian Bisson;David M. Clark;Mark Creamer

  • Treatment of acute stress disorder: a randomized controlled trial.

    Richard A. Bryant;Julie Mastrodomenico;Kim Louise Felmingham;Sally Hopwood

Frequent Co-Authors

Meaghan O'Donnell
Meaghan O'Donnell University of Melbourne
David Forbes
David Forbes University of Melbourne
Richard A. Bryant
Richard A. Bryant University of New South Wales
Alexander C. McFarlane
Alexander C. McFarlane University of Adelaide
Derrick Silove
Derrick Silove University of New South Wales
Caroline Hunt
Caroline Hunt University of Sydney
Andrew Page
Andrew Page Western Sydney University
Gavin Andrews
Gavin Andrews University of New South Wales
Angela Nickerson
Angela Nickerson University of New South Wales
Kim L Felmingham
Kim L Felmingham University of Melbourne

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in psychology opens a wide range of online degree options and professional pathways, especially for those interested in counseling. With increasing demand for mental health professionals across the United States, many students are seeking flexible educational routes into the field.

If you’re looking for the fastest way to become a counselor in Illinois, selecting an accelerated online counseling degree could help you achieve your goal sooner. Similarly, students in Indiana can benefit from Indiana fastest counseling programs, enabling a quicker transition into the workforce.

Prospective counselors in neighboring states should also consider the fastest way to become a counselor in Iowa or take advantage of the shortest path to becoming a counselor in Kansas. These state-specific resources can provide valuable guidance on program prerequisites, licensure requirements, and flexible study options.

Whether you are just starting your educational journey or seeking to upskill quickly, these pathways can help you enter a rewarding field that makes a real difference in people’s lives.

Best Scientists Citing Mark Creamer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles