World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Plant Science and Agronomy

D-Index
40
Citations
5522
World Ranking
3973
National Ranking
26

Marianne Popp publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marianne Popp sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36 publications 467+

This scientist: 87 publications — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

Marianne Popp D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marianne Popp sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is she best known for?

The fields of study she is best known for:

  • Ecology
  • Botany
  • Enzyme

Her primary scientific interests are in Botany, Stomatal conductance, Rhizophoraceae, Osmotic pressure and Ecophysiology. Her Botany study often links to related topics such as Horticulture. Her biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Agronomy, Water-use efficiency and Transpiration.

Her Rhizophoraceae study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Aegiceras corniculatum and δ13C. The Osmotic pressure study combines topics in areas such as Fruit tree and Osmoregulation. Her Ecophysiology research includes themes of Desiccation, Desiccation tolerance and Moss.

Her most cited work include:

  • MANGROVE ISOTOPIC (δ15N AND δ13C) FRACTIONATION ACROSS A NITROGEN VS. PHOSPHORUS LIMITATION GRADIENT (207 citations)
  • The role of solute accumulation, osmotic adjustment and changes in cell wall elasticity in drought tolerance in Ziziphus mauritiana (Lamk.) (167 citations)
  • Physiological and morphological adaptations of the fruit tree Ziziphus rotundifolia in response to progressive drought stress (132 citations)

What are the main themes of her work throughout her whole career to date?

The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Botany, Photosynthesis, Ecology, Ecophysiology and Biochemistry. Her Botany study combines topics in areas such as Halophyte and Horticulture. Her Halophyte study deals with Dry season intersecting with Batis maritima.

Her Photosynthesis research integrates issues from Biomass and Carbon dioxide. In her study, Aechmea lingulata, Compensation point and Salinity is strongly linked to Epiphyte, which falls under the umbrella field of Ecophysiology. Her work on Avicennia, Acanthus ilicifolius and Rhizophoraceae as part of general Mangrove study is frequently linked to Heritiera littoralis, bridging the gap between disciplines.

She most often published in these fields:

  • Botany (67.06%)
  • Photosynthesis (17.65%)
  • Ecology (15.29%)

What were the highlights of her more recent work (between 1998-2012)?

  • Botany (67.06%)
  • Ecology (15.29%)
  • Photosynthesis (17.65%)

In recent papers she was focusing on the following fields of study:

Her primary areas of study are Botany, Ecology, Photosynthesis, Nutrient and Ecophysiology. Her Botany research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Biomass and Horticulture. Her studies deal with areas such as Amino acid, Glutamine, Osmoregulation and Ammonium as well as Photosynthesis.

The concepts of her Nutrient study are interwoven with issues in Rhizophora mangle, Rhizophoraceae, Agronomy, Phosphorus and Nitrogen cycle. Her research in Agronomy tackles topics such as Transpiration which are related to areas like Stomatal conductance and Water-use efficiency. Her work in Ecophysiology addresses subjects such as Hemiepiphyte, which are connected to disciplines such as Mesembryanthemum crystallinum and Malic acid.

Between 1998 and 2012, her most popular works were:

  • MANGROVE ISOTOPIC (δ15N AND δ13C) FRACTIONATION ACROSS A NITROGEN VS. PHOSPHORUS LIMITATION GRADIENT (207 citations)
  • Physiological and morphological adaptations of the fruit tree Ziziphus rotundifolia in response to progressive drought stress (132 citations)
  • Stable isotopic composition of carbon and nitrogen and nitrogen content in vascular epiphytes along an altitudinal transect (84 citations)

In her most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Ecology
  • Botany
  • Enzyme

Her main research concerns Botany, Ecology, Stomatal conductance, Ecophysiology and δ13C. Her Botany study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Organic matter, Isotopes of nitrogen and Osmoregulation. Her Stomatal conductance research incorporates themes from Phosphorus, Water-use efficiency, Turgor pressure, Isotope analysis and Mangrove.

Her Turgor pressure study incorporates themes from Agronomy, Irrigation, Fruit tree, Osmoprotectant and Transpiration. Marianne Popp focuses mostly in the field of Ecophysiology, narrowing it down to topics relating to Desiccation tolerance and, in certain cases, Habitat. The various areas that Marianne Popp examines in her δ13C study include Rhizophora mangle, Rhizophoraceae, Nitrogen, Tropical and subtropical dry broadleaf forests and Bromeliaceae.

Best Publications

  • Altitudinal increase of mobile carbon pools in Pinus cembra suggests sink limitation of growth at the Swiss treeline

    Giinter Hoch;Marianne Popp;Christian Körner

  • The role of solute accumulation, osmotic adjustment and changes in cell wall elasticity in drought tolerance in Ziziphus mauritiana (Lamk.)

    Sean C. Clifford;Stefan K Arndt;Janet E. Corlett;Sangeeta Joshi

  • Physiological and morphological adaptations of the fruit tree Ziziphus rotundifolia in response to progressive drought stress

    S. K. Arndt;S. C. Clifford;W. Wanek;H. G. Jones

  • MANGROVE ISOTOPIC (δ15N AND δ13C) FRACTIONATION ACROSS A NITROGEN VS. PHOSPHORUS LIMITATION GRADIENT

    Karen L. McKee;Ilka C. Feller;Marianne Popp;Wolfgang Wanek

  • Chemical composition of halophytes from the Neusiedler Lake region in Austria

    R. Albert;Marianne Popp

  • Sample preservation for determination of organic compounds: microwave versus freeze-drying

    Marianne Popp;Wolfgang Lied;Andreas J. Meyer;Andreas Richter

  • Stable isotopic composition of carbon and nitrogen and nitrogen content in vascular epiphytes along an altitudinal transect

    P. Hietz;W. Wanek;M. Popp

  • Chemical Composition of Australian Mangroves II. Low Molecular Weight Carbohydrates

    Marianne Popp

  • Ecophysiology of xerophytic and halophytic vegetation of a coastal alluvial plain in northern Venezuela

    J. A. C. Smith;J. A. C. Smith;M. Popp;U. Lüttge;W. J. Cram

  • Contrasting adaptations to drought stress in field-grown Ziziphus mauritiana and Prunus persica trees: water relations, osmotic adjustment and carbon isotope composition

    Stefan K. Arndt;Wolfgang Wanek;Sean C. Clifford;Marianne Popp

  • Mucilages and polysaccharides in Ziziphus species (Rhamnaceae): localization, composition and physiological roles during drought‐stress

    S.C. Clifford;S.K. Arndt;M. Popp;H.G. Jones

  • Desiccation tolerance of three moss species from continental Antarctica

    Sharon A. Robinson;Jane Wasley;Marianne Popp;Catherine E. Lovelock

  • Crassulacean acid metabolism in tropical dicotyledonous trees of the genusClusia

    M. Popp;D. Kramer;H. Lee;M. Diaz

  • Hydroxyl radical scavenging properties of cyclitols

    Birgit Orthen;Marianne Popp;Nicholas Smirnoff

  • Ecophysiological comportment of the tropical CAM‐tree Clusia in the field

    E. Ball;J. Hann;M. Kluge;H. S. J. Lee

  • Chemical Composition of Australian Mangroves I. Inorganic Ions and Organic Acids

    Marianne Popp

  • Osmotic adaption in Australian mangroves

    M. Popp;F. Larher;P. Weigel

  • Climate change manipulations show Antarctic flora is more strongly affected by elevated nutrients than water

    Jane Wasley;Sharon A. Robinson;Catherine E. Lovelock;Marianne Popp

  • The physiological importance of accumulation of cyclitols in Viscum album L.

    Andreas Richter;Marianne Popp

  • Ecological basis for a sustainable management of the indigenous vegetation in a Central-Asian desert: Presentation and first results

    Frank M. Thomas;Stefan K. Arndt;Helge Bruelheide;Andrea Foetzki

  • Chemical Composition of Australian Mangroves III. Free Amino Acids, Total Methylated Onium Compounds and Total Nitrogen

    M. Popp;F. Larher;P. Weigel

  • Targeted metabolite profiling provides a functional link among eucalypt taxonomy, physiology and evolution

    Andrew Merchant;Andreas Richter;Marianne Popp;Mark Adams

  • Physiological adaptations to different salinity levels in mangrove

    Marianne Popp;Jaime Polania;Maria Weiper

  • Soil salinity, sun exposure, and growth of Acrostichum aureum, the mangrove fern.

    Ernesto Medina;Elvira Cuevas;Marianne Popp;Ariel E. Lugo

Frequent Co-Authors

Stefan K. Arndt
Stefan K. Arndt University of Melbourne
Ulrich Lüttge
Ulrich Lüttge Technical University of Darmstadt
Wolfgang Wanek
Wolfgang Wanek University of Vienna
Catherine E. Lovelock
Catherine E. Lovelock University of Queensland
Klaus Winter
Klaus Winter Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute
Sharon A. Robinson
Sharon A. Robinson University of Wollongong
Thorsten E. E. Grams
Thorsten E. E. Grams Technical University of Munich
Andreas J. Meyer
Andreas J. Meyer University of Bonn
Howard Griffiths
Howard Griffiths University of Cambridge
Hamlyn G. Jones
Hamlyn G. Jones University of Dundee

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Marianne Popp