World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Marc Boogaerts

Marc Boogaerts

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 78 17902 16826 225 215 360 26974

Marc Boogaerts publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Marc Boogaerts between 1980 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Marc Boogaerts published across 46 years, from 1980 to 2025, averaging 8.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 33 publications in 1996. 4 of the 381 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1980 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 33. Peak 33 publications in 1996. 1980: 2 publications 1981: 2 publications 1982: 5 publications 1983: 6 publications 1984: 3 publications 1985: 4 publications 1986: 5 publications 1987: 13 publications 1988: 10 publications 1989: 8 publications 1990: 13 publications 1991: 9 publications 1992: 12 publications 1993: 5 publications 1994: 12 publications 1995: 18 publications 1996: 33 publications 1997: 16 publications 1998: 21 publications 1999: 18 publications 2000: 9 publications 2001: 16 publications 2002: 19 publications 2003: 17 publications 2004: 17 publications 2005: 21 publications 2006: 17 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 1 publication 2013: 2 publications 2014: 1 publication 2015: 0 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 0 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 1 publication
1980 2025

381 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Marc Boogaerts: publications per year, 1980 to 2025
Year Publications
1980 2
1981 2
1982 5
1983 6
1984 3
1985 4
1986 5
1987 13
1988 10
1989 8
1990 13
1991 9
1992 12
1993 5
1994 12
1995 18
1996 33
1997 16
1998 21
1999 18
2000 9
2001 16
2002 19
2003 17
2004 17
2005 21
2006 17
2007 9
2008 8
2009 8
2010 8
2011 3
2012 1
2013 2
2014 1
2015 0
2016 3
2017 0
2018 0
2019 0
2020 0
2021 0
2022 0
2023 3
2024 3
2025 1
Total 381
Download as CSV

Marc Boogaerts publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marc Boogaerts sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 341–360 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 360 publications — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922 360
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Marc Boogaerts D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marc Boogaerts sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 78–79 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 78 D-Index — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891 78
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Marc Boogaerts is affiliated with KU Leuven in Belgium and has contributed to the field of medicine with a focus on several specialized subfields including Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Urology, Rheumatology, and Surgery. Their work spans various topics related to urological and genital health, autoimmune disorders, and prenatal diagnostics.

Boogaerts's recent publications reflect research interests centered on genital health and pediatric care. Notable papers include:

  • "Vaginal foreign body in the pediatric patient: A systematic review," 2024, European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
  • "Acute genitale ulcera en Lipschütz-ulcus: differentiaaldiagnose en behandeling," 2023, Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde
  • "E-book: Gynaecologie - Uitgave 2023," 2023, Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde
  • "E-book: SOA's - Uitgave 2024," 2024, Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde
  • "E-book: Aw, een wonde! Wat nu? - Uitgave 2024," 2024, Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde

Frequent publication venues where Boogaerts has contributed include:

  • Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde
  • European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
  • Human Reproduction

The scientist's research topics cover a range of medical concerns such as:

  • Ureteral procedures and complications
  • Urological Disorders and Treatments
  • Pelvic floor disorders treatments
  • Genital Health and Disease
  • Syphilis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Autoimmune and Inflammatory Disorders
  • Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics

Boogaerts frequently collaborates with a number of researchers, including Howard A. Joos, K. Wuyts, A. Verest, E. Umans, and Bart Vergauwe. These collaborations reflect a diverse network within related medical specialties.

Best Publications

  • A Tyrosine Kinase Created by Fusion of the PDGFRA and FIP1L1 Genes as a Therapeutic Target of Imatinib in Idiopathic Hypereosinophilic Syndrome

    Jan Cools;Jan Cools;Daniel J. DeAngelo;Jason Gotlib;Elizabeth H. Stover

  • Autologous bone marrow-derived stem-cell transfer in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: double-blind, randomised controlled trial.

    Stefan Janssens;Christophe Dubois;Jan Bogaert;Koen Theunissen

  • Galactomannan and Computed Tomography–Based Preemptive Antifungal Therapy in Neutropenic Patients at High Risk for Invasive Fungal Infection: A Prospective Feasibility Study

    Johan Maertens;Koen Theunissen;Gregor Verhoef;Johnny Verschakelen

  • Efficacy and Safety of Caspofungin for Treatment of Invasive Aspergillosis in Patients Refractory to or Intolerant of Conventional Antifungal Therapy

    Johan Maertens;Issam Raad;George Petrikkos;Marc Boogaerts

  • Randomised trial of filgrastim-mobilised peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation versus autologous bone-marrow transplantation in lymphoma patients

    N Schmitz;P Dreger;D.C Linch;A.H Goldstone

  • Early consolidation by myeloablative radiochemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation in first remission significantly prolongs progression-free survival in mantle-cell lymphoma: results of a prospective randomized trial of the European MCL Network

    Martin Dreyling;Georg Lenz;Eva Hoster;Achiel Van Hoof

  • Screening for circulating galactomannan as a noninvasive diagnostic tool for invasive aspergillosis in prolonged neutropenic patients and stem cell transplantation recipients: a prospective validation.

    Johan Maertens;Jan Verhaegen;Katrien Lagrou;Johan Van Eldere

  • Prognostic Index for Adult Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia in First Relapse

    Dimitri A. Breems;Wim L.J. Van Putten;Peter C. Huijgens;Gert J. Ossenkoppele

  • Erythrocyte adherence to endothelium in sickle-cell anemia. A possible determinant of disease severity.

    Robert P. Hebbel;Marc A. B. Boogaerts;John W. Eaton;Martin H. Steinberg

  • Autopsy-Controlled Prospective Evaluation of Serial Screening for Circulating Galactomannan by a Sandwich Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay for Hematological Patients at Risk for Invasive Aspergillosis

    Johan Maertens;Jan Verhaegen;Hilde Demuynck;Penelope Brock

  • Effect of priming with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor on the outcome of chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia.

    Bob Löwenberg;Wim van Putten;Matthias Theobald;Jurg Gmür

  • Constitutively activating mutation in WASP causes X-linked severe congenital neutropenia

    Koenraad Devriendt;Annette S. Kim;Gert Mathijs;Suzanna G M Frints

  • Use of Circulating Galactomannan Screening for Early Diagnosis of Invasive Aspergillosis in Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients

    Johan Maertens;Johan Van Eldere;Jan Verhaegen;Erik Verbeken

  • Retrospective comparison of reduced-intensity conditioning and conventional high-dose conditioning for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation using HLA-identical sibling donors in myelodysplastic syndromes.

    Rodrigo Martino;Simona Iacobelli;Ronald Brand;Thekla Jansen

  • Intravenous and oral itraconazole versus intravenous amphotericin B deoxycholate as empirical antifungal therapy for persistent fever in neutropenic patients with cancer who are receiving broad-spectrum antibacterial therapy - A randomized, controlled trial

    Boogaerts M;Winston Dj;Bow Ej;Garber G

  • Reduced-Intensity Conditioning Compared With Conventional Allogeneic Stem-Cell Transplantation in Relapsed or Refractory Hodgkin's Lymphoma: An Analysis From the Lymphoma Working Party of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation

    Anna Sureda;Stephen Robinson;Carmen Canals;Angelo M. Carella

  • Marginal zone B-cell lymphomas of different sites share similar cytogenetic and morphologic features

    J. Dierlamm;Lucienne Michaux;S. Pittaluga;Iwona Wlodarska

  • Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Transplantation for Patients 50 Years or Older With Myelodysplastic Syndromes or Secondary Acute Myeloid Leukemia

    ZiYi Lim;Ronald Brand;Rodrigo Martino;Anja van Biezen

  • Bone marrow transplantation from HLA-identical siblings as treatment for myelodysplasia.

    Jorge Sierra;Waleska S. Pérez;Ciril Rozman;Enric Carreras

  • Intravenous and Oral Itraconazole versus Intravenous Amphotericin B Deoxycholate as Empirical Antifungal Therapy for Persistent Fever in Neutropenic Patients with Cancer Who Are Receiving Broad-Spectrum Antibacterial Therapy

    Marc Boogaerts;Drew J. Winston;Eric J. Bow;Gary Garber

Frequent Co-Authors

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative pathways can be a smart move if you’re interested in a medical career but want flexibility or a different focus. Many students look for programs that offer a quicker route into the healthcare field or allow for advancement into new roles. For example, you can consider a nursing school that don't require teas exams, which can make the admissions process smoother for aspiring nurses.

Those interested in leadership or administrative roles might choose an accelerated healthcare administration degree online, providing a fast track to management positions. Registered nurses aiming to advance their practice can opt for rn to np programs online to become nurse practitioners.

Additionally, if you have a passion for wellness and nutrition, the best online nutrition programs offer a flexible way to earn a degree in this growing field. These related degrees expand your career options and can complement or even provide alternatives to the traditional pathway of studying medicine in the USA.

Best Scientists Citing Marc Boogaerts

Recently Published Articles