World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 59 3729 3439 32 31 275 11652

Linda C. W. Lam publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Linda C. W. Lam between 1992 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Linda C. W. Lam published across 34 years, from 1992 to 2025, averaging 9.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 22 publications in 2016. 19 of the 320 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1992 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 22. Peak 22 publications in 2016. 1992: 1 publication 1993: 2 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 8 publications 1997: 9 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 2 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 17 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 16 publications 2009: 12 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 13 publications 2013: 15 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 18 publications 2016: 22 publications 2017: 18 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 19 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 18 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 10 publications 2024: 10 publications 2025: 9 publications
1992 2025

320 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Linda C. W. Lam: publications per year, 1992 to 2025
Year Publications
1992 1
1993 2
1994 2
1995 0
1996 8
1997 9
1998 5
1999 1
2000 2
2001 6
2002 3
2003 7
2004 6
2005 5
2006 17
2007 7
2008 16
2009 12
2010 9
2011 11
2012 13
2013 15
2014 10
2015 18
2016 22
2017 18
2018 9
2019 19
2020 12
2021 18
2022 8
2023 10
2024 10
2025 9
Total 320
Download as CSV

Linda C. W. Lam publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Linda C. W. Lam sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 271–280 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 275 publications — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151 275
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Linda C. W. Lam D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Linda C. W. Lam sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 58–59 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325 59
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Linda C. W. Lam is affiliated with the Chinese University of Hong Kong in China and conducts research primarily within the fields of medicine and neuroscience. Their work encompasses a range of topics related to brain health and mental wellness, with particular attention to neurological and psychiatric conditions.

Their research covers several subfields, including neurology, psychiatry and mental health, cognitive neuroscience, clinical psychology, and radiology, nuclear medicine, and imaging. The main topics addressed in their publications feature dementia and cognitive impairment research, transcranial magnetic stimulation studies, functional brain connectivity studies, COVID-19 and mental health, stroke rehabilitation and recovery, mental health treatment and access, and health disparities and outcomes.

The most frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • Alzheimer s & Dementia
  • Frontiers in Psychiatry
  • Brain stimulation
  • International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
  • Trials

Notable recent papers authored by or including Linda C. W. Lam are:

  • "Tackling challenges in care of Alzheimer's disease and other dementias amid the COVID-19 pandemic, now and in the future," published in 2020 in Alzheimer s & Dementia
  • "Personalized prediction of transcranial magnetic stimulation clinical response in patients with treatment-refractory depression using neuroimaging biomarkers and machine learning," published in 2021 in Journal of Affective Disorders
  • "Window View Quality: Why It Matters and What We Should Do," published in 2022 in LEUKOS The Journal of the Illuminating Engineering Society of North America
  • "A pilot feasibility randomized controlled trial on combining mind-body physical exercise, cognitive training, and nurse-led risk factor modification to reduce cognitive decline among older adults with mild cognitive impairment in primary care," published in 2020 in PeerJ
  • "APOE ε4 and the Influence of Sex, Age, Vascular Risk Factors, and Ethnicity on Cognitive Decline," published in 2020 in The Journals of Gerontology Series A

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Linda C. W. Lam include:

  • Allen Lee
  • Suk Ling
  • Sandra Sau Man Chan
  • Hanna Lu
  • Wai Chi Chan

Best Publications

  • Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) in Hong Kong in 2003: stress and psychological impact among frontline healthcare workers

    Cindy W. C. Tam;Edwin P. F. Pang;Linda C. W. Lam;Helen F. K. Chiu

  • The Prevalence of Mild Cognitive Impairment in Diverse Geographical and Ethnocultural Regions: The COSMIC Collaboration

    Perminder S. Sachdev;Darren M. Lipnicki;Nicole A. Kochan;John D. Crawford

  • A 1-year randomized controlled trial comparing mind body exercise (Tai Chi) with stretching and toning exercise on cognitive function in older Chinese adults at risk of cognitive decline.

    Linda C.W. Lam;Rachel C.M. Chau;Billy M.L. Wong;Ada W.T. Fung

  • Efficacy of aromatherapy (Lavandula angustifolia) as an intervention for agitated behaviours in Chinese older persons with dementia: a cross-over randomized trial.

    Pamela Wan-ki Lin;Wai-chi Chan;Bacon Fung-leung Ng;Linda Chiu-wa Lam

  • Prevalence of dementia in Chinese elderly in Hong Kong

    H.F.K. Chiu;L.C.W. Lam;I. Chi;T. Leung

  • Sleep-related injury in the elderly--an epidemiological study in Hong Kong.

    H. F. K. Chiu;Y. K. Wing;L. C. W. Lam;S. W. Li

  • Interim follow-up of a randomized controlled trial comparing Chinese style mind body (Tai Chi) and stretching exercises on cognitive function in subjects at risk of progressive cognitive decline.

    Linda C. W. Lam;Rachel C. M. Chau;Billy M. L. Wong;Ada W. T. Fung

  • Prevalence, psychosocial correlates and service utilization of depressive and anxiety disorders in Hong Kong: the Hong Kong Mental Morbidity Survey (HKMMS).

    Linda Chiu-Wa Lam;Corine Sau-Man Wong;Min-Jung Wang;Wai-Chi Chan

  • Curcumin effects on blood lipid profile in a 6-month human study.

    Larry Baum;Stanley K.K. Cheung;Vincent C.T. Mok;Linda C.W. Lam

  • Age-related cognitive decline and associations with sex, education and apolipoprotein E genotype across ethnocultural groups and geographic regions: a collaborative cohort study

    Darren M Lipnicki;John D Crawford;Rajib Dutta;Anbupalam Thalamuthu

  • Would Older Adults with Mild Cognitive Impairment Adhere to and Benefit from a Structured Lifestyle Activity Intervention to Enhance Cognition?: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial

    Linda Chiu-wa Lam;Wai Chi Chan;Tony Leung;Ada Wai-tung Fung

  • Social support and well-being in dementia family caregivers: The mediating role of self-efficacy

    Alma Au;Man-Kin Lai;Kam-Mei Lau;Pey-Chyou Pan

  • Validation of the Chinese translation of the 6-item De Jong Gierveld loneliness scale in elderly Chinese

    Grace Tak Yu Leung;Jenny de Jong Gierveld;Linda Chiu Wa Lam

  • Tackling challenges in care of Alzheimer's disease and other dementias amid the COVID-19 pandemic, now and in the future.

    Vincent C.T. Mok;Sarah Pendlebury;Sarah Pendlebury;Adrian Wong;Suvarna Alladi

  • Validation study of the Chinese version of the neuropsychiatric inventory (CNPI).

    Vivian P. Y. Leung;Linda C. W. Lam;Helen F. K. Chiu;Jeffrey L. Cummings

  • Subjective memory complaints in Chinese subjects with mild cognitive impairment and early Alzheimer's disease.

    Linda C. W. Lam;Victor W. C. Lui;Cindy W. C. Tam;Helen F. K. Chiu

  • Benefit-finding and effect on caregiver depression: A double-blind randomized controlled trial.

    Sheung-Tak Cheng;Emily P. M. Mak;Helene H. Fung;Timothy Kwok

  • Prevalence of very mild and mild dementia in community-dwelling older Chinese people in Hong Kong

    Linda Chiu Wa Lam;Cindy W C Tam;Victor W C Lui;W C Chan

  • A double‐blind randomised comparison of risperidone and haloperidol in the treatment of behavioural and psychological symptoms in Chinese dementia patients

    Wai-chi Chan;Linda Chiu-wa Lam;Caroline Nga-pui Choy;Vivian Pui-yiu Leung

  • Voices of Alzheimer Caregivers on Positive Aspects of Caregiving

    Sheung-Tak Cheng;Sheung-Tak Cheng;Emily P. M. Mak;Rosanna W. L. Lau;Natalie S. S. Ng

  • Self-efficacy Is Associated With Less Burden and More Gains From Behavioral Problems of Alzheimer’s Disease in Hong Kong Chinese Caregivers

    Sheung-Tak Cheng;Linda C. W. Lam;Timothy Kwok;Natalie S. S. Ng

Frequent Co-Authors

Helen F.K. Chiu
Helen F.K. Chiu Chinese University of Hong Kong
Sheung-Tak Cheng
Sheung-Tak Cheng Education University of Hong Kong
Vincent Mok
Vincent Mok Chinese University of Hong Kong
Nikolaos Scarmeas
Nikolaos Scarmeas National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
Ki Woong Kim
Ki Woong Kim Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
Adrian Wong
Adrian Wong Chinese University of Hong Kong
Marcus Richards
Marcus Richards University College London
Perminder S. Sachdev
Perminder S. Sachdev University of New South Wales
Helene H. Fung
Helene H. Fung Chinese University of Hong Kong
Miia Kivipelto
Miia Kivipelto University of Eastern Finland

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in psychology opens doors to various online programs and diverse career pathways. Many students are now interested in flexible, accelerated education options that allow them to enter the workforce faster. Online counseling and psychology degrees are popular for their accessibility, especially for those balancing work or family commitments.

Several states offer specialized, streamlined routes to becoming a counselor. For example, you can consider the South Dakota fastest counseling programs or look into the Tennessee accelerated counseling programs. These accelerated tracks often blend online learning with practical experience, helping students qualify for licensure more efficiently.

If you're based elsewhere, there are also options like the Texas accelerated counseling programs or the Utah fastest counseling programs. Ultimately, choosing the right pathway depends on your educational background, state requirements, and career goals. Exploring these regional options lets you find a program that best matches your needs and timeline.

Best Scientists Citing Linda C. W. Lam

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles