World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 87 1241 1121 18 15 578 34032

Vincent Mok publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Vincent Mok between 1997 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Vincent Mok published across 29 years, from 1997 to 2025, averaging 24.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 56 publications in 2021. 66 of the 700 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1997 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 56. Peak 56 publications in 2021. 1997: 1 publication 1998: 1 publication 1999: 0 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 1 publication 2002: 1 publication 2003: 6 publications 2004: 16 publications 2005: 10 publications 2006: 10 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 11 publications 2009: 22 publications 2010: 23 publications 2011: 34 publications 2012: 23 publications 2013: 25 publications 2014: 34 publications 2015: 45 publications 2016: 32 publications 2017: 45 publications 2018: 34 publications 2019: 51 publications 2020: 54 publications 2021: 56 publications 2022: 42 publications 2023: 52 publications 2024: 48 publications 2025: 18 publications
1997 2025

700 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Vincent Mok: publications per year, 1997 to 2025
Year Publications
1997 1
1998 1
1999 0
2000 1
2001 1
2002 1
2003 6
2004 16
2005 10
2006 10
2007 4
2008 11
2009 22
2010 23
2011 34
2012 23
2013 25
2014 34
2015 45
2016 32
2017 45
2018 34
2019 51
2020 54
2021 56
2022 42
2023 52
2024 48
2025 18
Total 700
Download as CSV

Vincent Mok publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Vincent Mok sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 578–587 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 578 publications — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20 578
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Vincent Mok D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Vincent Mok sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 86–87 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 87 D-Index — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84 87
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Vincent Mok is affiliated with the Chinese University of Hong Kong in China and has an extensive body of research primarily in medicine, with a focus on neurology. Their work spans multiple subfields of study including neurology, psychiatry and mental health, epidemiology, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, and physiology.

The scientist's research covers several main topics:

  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
  • Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications

Vincent Mok has contributed to various peer-reviewed journals and frequently publishes in these venues:

  • Alzheimer s & Dementia (36 publications)
  • Stroke (14 publications)
  • Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry (9 publications)
  • Cerebral Circulation - Cognition and Behavior (8 publications)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (8 publications)

The scientist has collaborated extensively with several researchers, including:

  • Bonnie Lam (51 co-publications)
  • Ho Ko (51 co-publications)
  • Lin Shi (44 co-publications)
  • Lisa Au (37 co-publications)
  • Thomas Leung (37 co-publications)

Some recent publications demonstrate the scope and focus of their research:

  • Neuroimaging standards for research into small vessel disease-advances since 2013, 2023, The Lancet Neurology
  • Evidence-based prevention of Alzheimer's disease: systematic review and meta-analysis of 243 observational prospective studies and 153 randomised controlled trials, 2020, Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
  • Strategic infarct locations for post-stroke cognitive impairment: a pooled analysis of individual patient data from 12 acute ischaemic stroke cohorts, 2021, The Lancet Neurology
  • Bell's palsy following vaccination with mRNA (BNT162b2) and inactivated (CoronaVac) SARS-CoV-2 vaccines: a case series and nested case-control study, 2021, The Lancet Infectious Diseases
  • Identification of Risk Loci for Parkinson Disease in Asians and Comparison of Risk Between Asians and Europeans, 2020, JAMA Neurology

Best Publications

  • Neuroimaging standards for research into small vessel disease and its contribution to ageing and neurodegeneration

    Joanna M. Wardlaw;Eric E. Smith;Geert J Biessels;Charlotte Cordonnier

  • Prevalence of cerebral amyloid pathology in persons without dementia: a meta-analysis.

    Willemijn J. Jansen;Rik Ossenkoppele;Dirk L. Knol;Betty M. Tijms

  • Neuroimaging standards for research into small vessel disease—advances since 2013

    Unknown

  • Automatic Detection of Cerebral Microbleeds From MR Images via 3D Convolutional Neural Networks

    Qi Dou;Hao Chen;Lequan Yu;Lei Zhao

  • Prevalence of amyloid PET positivity in dementia syndromes: a meta-analysis.

    Rik Ossenkoppele;Willemijn J Jansen;Gil D Rabinovici;Dirk L Knol

  • Vascular dysfunction-The disregarded partner of Alzheimer's disease

    Melanie D. Sweeney;Axel Montagne;Abhay P. Sagare;Daniel A. Nation

  • Six-Month Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, Pilot Clinical Trial of Curcumin in Patients With Alzheimer Disease

    Larry Baum;Christopher Wai Kei Lam;Stanley Kwok Kuen Cheung;Timothy Kwok

  • Vascular cognitive impairment.

    Wiesje M van der Flier;Ingmar Skoog;Julie A Schneider;Leonardo Pantoni

  • The Validity, Reliability and Clinical Utility of the Hong Kong Montreal Cognitive Assessment (HK-MoCA) in Patients with Cerebral Small Vessel Disease

    Adrian Wong;Yun Y. Xiong;Pauline W.L. Kwan;Anne Y.Y. Chan

  • Effects of Mindfulness Yoga vs Stretching and Resistance Training Exercises on Anxiety and Depression for People With Parkinson Disease: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

    Jojo Y. Y. Kwok;Jackie C. Y. Kwan;M. Auyeung;Vincent C. T. Mok

  • Spectral-Domain OCT Measurements in Alzheimer's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

    Victor T.T. Chan;Zihan Sun;Shumin Tang;Li Jia Chen

  • Cerebral microbleeds as a risk factor for subsequent intracerebral hemorrhages among patients with acute ischemic stroke.

    Yu Hua Fan;Lei Zhang;Wynnie W.M. Lam;Vincent C.T. Mok

  • Cognitive impairment and functional outcome after stroke associated with small vessel disease

    V C T Mok;A Wong;W W M Lam;Y H Fan

  • Validation of a new REM sleep behavior disorder questionnaire (RBDQ-HK).

    S.X. Li;Y.K. Wing;S.P. Lam;J. Zhang

  • Strategic infarct locations for post-stroke cognitive impairment: a pooled analysis of individual patient data from 12 acute ischaemic stroke cohorts.

    Nick A. Weaver;Hugo J. Kuijf;Hugo P. Aben;Jill Abrigo

  • A randomized controlled trial of surgery vs steroid injection for carpal tunnel syndrome

    A.C.F. Hui;S. Wong;C. H. Leung;P. Tong

  • Montreal Cognitive Assessment 5-Minute Protocol Is a Brief, Valid, Reliable, and Feasible Cognitive Screen for Telephone Administration

    Adrian Wong;David Nyenhuis;Sandra E. Black;Lorraine S.N. Law

  • Identification of Risk Loci for Parkinson Disease in Asians and Comparison of Risk Between Asians and Europeans: A Genome-Wide Association Study

    Jia Nee Foo;Jia Nee Foo;Elaine Guo Yan Chew;Elaine Guo Yan Chew;Sun Ju Chung;Rong Peng

  • Perioperative covert stroke in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery (NeuroVISION): a prospective cohort study.

    Marko Mrkobrada;Matthew T.V. Chan;David Cowan;Douglas Campbell

  • Preladenant in patients with Parkinson's disease and motor fluctuations: a phase 2, double-blind, randomised trial

    Robert A Hauser;Marc Cantillon;Marc Cantillon;Emmanuelle Pourcher;Federico Micheli

  • Quality of life of stroke survivors: a 1-year follow-up study.

    Timothy Kwok;Raymond S. Lo;Eric Wong;Tang Wai-Kwong

  • The prevalence of mild cognitive impairment and its etiological subtypes in elderly Chinese.

    Jianping Jia;Aihong Zhou;Cuibai Wei;Xiangfei Jia

  • Curcumin effects on blood lipid profile in a 6-month human study.

    Larry Baum;Stanley K.K. Cheung;Vincent C.T. Mok;Linda C.W. Lam

Frequent Co-Authors

Adrian Wong
Adrian Wong Chinese University of Hong Kong
Gabor S. Ungvari
Gabor S. Ungvari University of Notre Dame Australia
Christopher Chen
Christopher Chen National University of Singapore
Yun Kwok Wing
Yun Kwok Wing Chinese University of Hong Kong
Helen F.K. Chiu
Helen F.K. Chiu Chinese University of Hong Kong
Anil T. Ahuja
Anil T. Ahuja Chinese University of Hong Kong
Martin Dichgans
Martin Dichgans Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Joanna M. Wardlaw
Joanna M. Wardlaw University of Edinburgh
Jie Yang
Jie Yang RMIT University
Ka Sing Lawrence Wong
Ka Sing Lawrence Wong Chinese University of Hong Kong

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Neuroscience opens doors to a diverse array of online degrees and professional pathways. For those aiming for clinical or counseling roles, an online psyd program can provide the skills needed for advanced practice in psychology. If you are interested in supporting families and couples, consider exploring an online lmft program to become a licensed marriage and family therapist.

Accelerated programs are increasingly popular, allowing motivated students to complete their neuroscience or related degrees faster than traditional timelines. Discover options for accelerated programs that can jumpstart your career.

Choosing a degree that offers strong job prospects is important. Researching the best bachelor degrees for salary and employment rates can help you make informed decisions about your future.

With so many paths available, online study provides valuable flexibility for students aiming to enter neuroscience or related health and behavioral sciences fields.

Best Scientists Citing Vincent Mok

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles