World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
81
Citations
25361
World Ranking
3865
National Ranking
1916

Leslie M. Loew publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Leslie M. Loew sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 362 publications — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Leslie M. Loew D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Leslie M. Loew sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 81 D-Index — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Leslie M. Loew is affiliated with the University of Connecticut in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields within biological and medical sciences, with a focus on the interface of molecular biology, neuroscience, and cardiac physiology. The scientist's work contributes to understanding molecular mechanisms and dynamics in cellular systems and neural circuits.

The main fields of study for Leslie M. Loew include:

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
  • Neuroscience

Within these areas, their research covers specific subfields such as:

  • Molecular Biology
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Biomedical Engineering

Key topics that Leslie M. Loew has worked on are diverse and include:

  • RNA Research and Splicing
  • Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Photoreceptor and Optogenetics Research
  • Neural Dynamics and Brain Function
  • Cardiac Electrophysiology and Arrhythmias
  • Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Gene Regulatory Network Analysis

Among the scientist's publications, notable recent papers include:

  • The solubility product extends the buffering concept to heterotypic biomolecular condensates, 2021, eLife
  • Optogenetic manipulation of cardiac electrical dynamics using sub-threshold illumination: dissecting the role of cardiac alternans in terminating rapid rhythms, 2022, Basic Research in Cardiology
  • Hyperexcitable Phenotypes in Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Neurons From Patients With 15q11-q13 Duplication Syndrome, a Genetic Form of Autism, 2021, Biological Psychiatry
  • Transcranial photoacoustic imaging of NMDA-evoked focal circuit dynamics in the rat hippocampus, 2020, Journal of Neural Engineering
  • Voltage-Dependent Photoluminescence of Carbon Dots, 2020, Journal of The Electrochemical Society

Leslie M. Loew frequently publishes in the following venues:

  • Biophysical Journal
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Frontiers in Physiology
  • UNC Libraries
  • eLife

Collaborations are an important aspect of Leslie M. Loew's research, with frequent coauthors being:

  • Aniruddha Chattaraj
  • Leonardo Sacconi
  • Elisabetta Cerbai
  • Valentina Biasci
  • Michael L. Blinov

Best Publications

  • The systems biology markup language (SBML): a medium for representation and exchange of biochemical network models.

    M. Hucka;A. Finney;H. M. Sauro;H. Bolouri;H. Bolouri

  • Second-harmonic imaging microscopy for visualizing biomolecular arrays in cells, tissues and organisms.

    Paul J Campagnola;Leslie M Loew

  • High-resolution nonlinear optical imaging of live cells by second harmonic generation

    Paul J. Campagnola;Mei-De Wei;Aaron Lewis;Leslie M. Loew

  • Membrane potential can be determined in individual cells from the nernstian distribution of cationic dyes.

    B. Ehrenberg;V. Montana;M.D. Wei;J.P. Wuskell

  • The Virtual Cell : a software environment for computational cell biology

    Leslie M. Loew;James C. Schaff

  • Spectra, membrane binding, and potentiometric responses of new charge shift probes

    Eric Fluhler;Valerie G. Burnham;Leslie M. Loew

  • OLM interneurons differentially modulate CA3 and entorhinal inputs to hippocampal CA1 neurons

    Richardson N Leão;Sanja Mikulovic;Katarina E Leão;Katarina E Leão;Hermany Munguba

  • Construction of a fluorescent biosensor family

    Robert M. De Lorimier;J. Jeff Smith;Mary A. Dwyer;Loren L. Looger

  • A general computational framework for modeling cellular structure and function

    J. Schaff;C.C. Fink;B. Slepchenko;J.H. Carson

  • Quantitative cell biology with the Virtual Cell.

    Boris M. Slepchenko;James C. Schaff;Ian Macara;Leslie M. Loew

  • Optical imaging of cell membrane potential changes induced by applied electric fields

    D. Gross;L.M. Loew;W.W. Webb

  • Dual-wavelength ratiometric fluorescence measurement of the membrane dipole potential

    E. Gross;R.S. Bedlack;L.M. Loew

  • Second-harmonic imaging microscopy of living cells

    Paul J. Campagnola;Heather A. Clark;William A. Mohler;Aaron Lewis

  • Topology of the mitochondrial inner membrane: dynamics and bioenergetic implications.

    Carmen A. Mannella;Douglas R. Pfeiffer;Patrick C. Bradshaw;Ion I. Moraru

  • Simultaneous imaging of cell and mitochondrial membrane potentials

    D. L. Farkas;Mei-De Wei;P. Febbroriello;J. H. Carson

  • Kinetic analysis of receptor-activated phosphoinositide turnover.

    Chang Xu;James Watras;Leslie M. Loew

  • Virtual cell modelling and simulation software environment

    Ion I. Moraru;James C. Schaff;Boris M. Slepchenko;Michael Blinov

  • Systems Analysis of Ran Transport

    Alicia E. Smith;Boris M. Slepchenko;James C. Schaff;Leslie M. Loew

  • Imaging in five dimensions: time-dependent membrane potentials in individual mitochondria

    L.M. Loew;R.A. Tuft;W. Carrington;F.S. Fay

  • Characterization and Application of a New Optical Probe for Membrane Lipid Domains

    Lei Jin;Andrew C. Millard;Joseph P. Wuskell;Xuemei Dong

Frequent Co-Authors

Arman Rahmim
Arman Rahmim University of British Columbia
Jin U. Kang
Jin U. Kang Johns Hopkins University
Emad M. Boctor
Emad M. Boctor Johns Hopkins University
Peter D. Lee
Peter D. Lee University College London
Albert Gjedde
Albert Gjedde University of Copenhagen
Bruce J. Mayer
Bruce J. Mayer University of Connecticut
Ravi Iyengar
Ravi Iyengar Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Mark H. Ellisman
Mark H. Ellisman University of California, San Diego
Anthony A. Grace
Anthony A. Grace University of Pittsburgh
James Hone
James Hone Columbia University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in Biology or Biochemistry opens the door to many fastest nutrition degree online options. These accelerated nutrition programs are especially useful if you’re eager to start your career in health sciences quickly without compromising the quality of your education.

For those interested in management, an online healthcare mba is a popular next step. These programs often offer flexibility and affordability, preparing graduates for leadership roles in clinics, hospitals, and the wider healthcare industry.

If you’re more interested in the technical side of healthcare, consider the difference between cpc certification credentials and other medical coding certifications. Each path has its own certification process, requirements, and salary prospects.

Many students also ask how long does it take to become a medical coder. The timeline usually ranges from several months to a year, depending on the program and previous education, making it an attractive option for those looking to quickly enter the medical workforce.

Best Scientists Citing Leslie M. Loew

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles