World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Lawrence H. Boise

Lawrence H. Boise

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
83
Citations
50160
World Ranking
3414
National Ranking
1721

Lawrence H. Boise publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lawrence H. Boise sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 357 publications — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Lawrence H. Boise D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lawrence H. Boise sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 83 D-Index — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Lawrence H. Boise is a researcher affiliated with Emory University in the United States. Their work spans across multiple disciplines within the biomedical sciences, primarily focusing on medicine and biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology. The main research contributions of this scientist lie in the areas of multiple myeloma research and treatments, protein degradation and inhibitors, ubiquitin and proteasome pathways, CAR-T cell therapy research, cancer treatment and pharmacology, histone deacetylase inhibitors research, and peptidase inhibition and analysis.

Their scholarly output includes publications in several high-profile journals, with frequent contributions to "Blood," "Clinical Lymphoma Myeloma & Leukemia," "Journal of Clinical Oncology," "FEBS Journal," and "Blood Cancer Discovery."

Some recent papers authored or co-authored by Lawrence H. Boise are:

  • Long-Term Follow-Up Results of Lenalidomide, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone Induction Therapy and Risk-Adapted Maintenance Approach in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma, 2020, Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • Acetylation of KLF5 maintains EMT and tumorigenicity to cause chemoresistant bone metastasis in prostate cancer, 2021, Nature Communications
  • Targeting BCL-2 with venetoclax and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed/refractory t(11;14) multiple myeloma, 2020, American Journal of Hematology
  • Functional Genomics Identify Distinct and Overlapping Genes Mediating Resistance to Different Classes of Heterobifunctional Degraders of Oncoproteins, 2021, Cell Reports
  • Electron transport chain activity is a predictor and target for venetoclax sensitivity in multiple myeloma, 2020, Nature Communications

The scientist has collaborated frequently with other researchers, including:

  • Sagar Lonial
  • Benjamin G. Barwick
  • Vikas A. Gupta
  • Ajay K. Nooka
  • Madhav V. Dhodapkar

Their work focuses significantly on subfields such as molecular biology, hematology, oncology, immunology, and genetics, reflecting a multidisciplinary approach to understanding complex biological systems and developing therapeutic strategies. The prominence of multiple myeloma research within their portfolio highlights a dedicated effort to addressing hematologic malignancies.

Best Publications

  • Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy

    Daniel J. Klionsky;Fabio C. Abdalla;Hagai Abeliovich;Robert T. Abraham

  • Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition)

    Daniel J. Klionsky;Kotb Abdelmohsen;Akihisa Abe;Joynal Abedin

  • bcl-x, a bcl-2-related gene that functions as a dominant regulator of apoptotic cell death

    Lawrence H. Boise;Maribel González-García;Christina E. Postema;Liyun Ding

  • Bad, a heterodimeric partner for Bcl-xL and Bcl-2, displaces bax and promotes cell death

    Elizabeth Yang;Jiping Zha;Jennifer Jockel;Lawrence H Boise

  • CD28 costimulation can promote T cell survival by enhancing the expression of Bcl-xL

    Lawrence H. Boise;Andy J. Minn;Patricia J. Noel;Carl H. June

  • Proteasome inhibitors induce a terminal unfolded protein response in multiple myeloma cells.

    Esther A. Obeng;Louise M. Carlson;Delia M. Gutman;William J. Harrington

  • Caspase-9, caspase-3 and caspase-7 have distinct roles during intrinsic apoptosis.

    Matthew Brentnall;Matthew Brentnall;Luis Rodriguez-Menocal;Rebeka Ladron De Guevara;Enrique Cepero

  • Multiple Bcl-2 family members demonstrate selective dimerizations with Bax

    Thomas W. Sedlak;Zoltán N. Oltvai;Elizabeth Yang;Kun Wang

  • Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition)

    Daniel J. Klionsky;Kotb Abdelmohsen;Akihisa Abe;Joynal Abedin

  • Interactions among members of the Bcl-2 protein family analyzed with a yeast two-hybrid system

    T Sato;M Hanada;S Bodrug;S Bodrug;S Irie

  • Bax-independent inhibition of apoptosis by Bcl-XL

    Emily H Y Cheng;Beth Levine;Lawrence H. Boise;Craig B. Thompson

  • bcl-XL Is the Major Bcl-X mRNA Form Expressed During Murine Development and Its Product Localizes to Mitochondria

    Maribel González-García;Rafael Pérez-Ballestero;Liyun Ding;Linda Duan

  • Expression of Bcl-xL Can Confer a Multidrug Resistance Phenotype

    Andy J. Minn;Charles M. Rudin;Lawrence H. Boise;Craig B. Thompson

  • Bcl-XL and Bcl-2 repress a common pathway of cell death.

    Debra T. Chao;Gerald P. Linette;Lawrence H. Boise;Lynn S. White

  • Discovery of Mcl-1-specific inhibitor AZD5991 and preclinical activity in multiple myeloma and acute myeloid leukemia.

    Adriana E. Tron;Matthew A. Belmonte;Ammar Adam;Brian M. Aquila;Brian M. Aquila

  • bcl-x is expressed in embryonic and postnatal neural tissues and functions to prevent neuronal cell death.

    M. Gonzalez-Garcia;Irène Garcia;L. Ding;S. O'Shea

  • Bortezomib Inhibits PKR-Like Endoplasmic Reticulum (ER) Kinase and Induces Apoptosis via ER Stress in Human Pancreatic Cancer Cells

    Steffan T. Nawrocki;Jennifer S. Carew;Kenneth Dunner;Lawrence H. Boise

  • Ascorbic acid enhances arsenic trioxide–induced cytotoxicity in multiple myeloma cells

    Jennifer M. Grad;Jennifer M. Grad;Nizar J. Bahlis;Nizar J. Bahlis;Isildinha Reis;Isildinha Reis;Marc M. Oshiro;Marc M. Oshiro

  • Expression of Bcl-xL and loss of p53 can cooperate to overcome a cell cycle checkpoint induced by mitotic spindle damage.

    A J Minn;L H Boise;C B Thompson

  • Hierarchical Control of Lymphocyte Survival

    Lawrence H. Boise;Craig B. Thompson

Frequent Co-Authors

Sagar Lonial
Sagar Lonial Emory University
Vikas Gupta
Vikas Gupta Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
Craig B. Thompson
Craig B. Thompson Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Kelvin P. Lee
Kelvin P. Lee Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center
Madhav V. Dhodapkar
Madhav V. Dhodapkar Emory University
Paula M. Vertino
Paula M. Vertino Emory University
Gabriel Núñez
Gabriel Núñez University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Christopher R. Flowers
Christopher R. Flowers The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Constantine S. Mitsiades
Constantine S. Mitsiades Harvard University
Andy J. Minn
Andy J. Minn University of Pennsylvania

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology and Biochemistry in the USA opens doors to a range of rewarding online degrees and healthcare careers. Many graduates are drawn to roles like medical coding and health information management, which offer stability and room for growth.

When considering a medical coding career, it’s important to understand the differences between ccs vs cpc certification. The right credential can influence your job options and potential salary. Curious about earning potential? Find out how much do medical coders make based on factors such as certification, experience, and region.

Wondering about job satisfaction? Learn what insiders say by exploring answers to is medical billing and coding a good career. For affordable and flexible education options, check out these affordable online him programs that can help you get started or advance your qualifications.

Best Scientists Citing Lawrence H. Boise

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles