World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Plant Science and Agronomy

D-Index
33
Citations
4213
World Ranking
5678
National Ranking
1377

Lawrence E. Steckel publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lawrence E. Steckel sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36 publications 467+

This scientist: 119 publications — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

Lawrence E. Steckel D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lawrence E. Steckel sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri): A Review

    Sarah M. Ward;Theodore M. Webster;Larry E. Steckel

  • The dioecious Amaranthus spp.: here to stay

    Lawrence E. Steckel

  • Temperature effects on germination of nine Amaranthus species

    Lawrence E. Steckel;Christy L. Sprague;Edward W. Stoller;Loyd M. Wax

  • Integrated pest management and weed management in the United States and Canada

    Micheal D K Owen;Hugh J Beckie;Julia Y Leeson;Jason K Norsworthy

  • Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) in Tennessee Has Low Level Glyphosate Resistance

    Lawrence E. Steckel;Christopher L. Main;Andrew T. Ellis;Thomas C. Mueller

  • Integrating reduced rates of postemergence herbicides and cultivation for broadleaf weed control in soybeans (Glycine max).

    Lawrence E. Steckel;Michael S. Defelice;Barry D. Sims

  • Common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) interference in corn

    Unknown

  • Effects of shading on common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) growth and development

    Lawrence E. Steckel;Christy L. Sprague;Aaron G. Hager;F. William Simmons

  • Assessment of Weed Management Practices and Problem Weeds in the Midsouth United States—Soybean: A Consultant's Perspective

    Dilpreet S. Riar;Jason K. Norsworthy;Lawrence E. Steckel;Daniel O. Stephenson

  • Two new PPX2 mutations associated with resistance to PPO‐inhibiting herbicides in Amaranthus palmeri

    Darci A Giacomini;Alinna M Umphres;Haozhen Nie;Thomas C Mueller

  • Tall Waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus) and Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) Seed Production and Retention at Soybean Maturity

    Lauren M. Schwartz;Jason K. Norsworthy;Bryan G. Young;Kevin W. Bradley

  • Adoption of Best Management Practices for Herbicide-Resistant Weeds in Midsouthern United States Cotton, Rice, and Soybean

    Dilpreet S. Riar;Jason K. Norsworthy;Lawrence E. Steckel;Daniel O. Stephenson

  • Tillage, Cropping System, and Soil Depth Effects on Common Waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) Seed-Bank Persistence

    Lawrence E. Steckel;Christy L. Sprague;Edward W. Stoller;Loyd M. Wax

  • Biotic and abiotic factors influence horseweed emergence

    Christopher L. Main;Lawrence E. Steckel;Robert M. Hayes;Thomas C. Mueller

  • Dissipation of Fomesafen, Saflufenacil, Sulfentrazone, and Flumioxazin from a Tennessee Soil under Field Conditions

    Thomas C. Mueller;Bill W. Boswell;Sara S. Mueller;Lawrence E. Steckel

  • Confirmation and Control of Glyphosate-Resistant Giant Ragweed (Ambrosia trifida) in Tennessee

    Jason K. Norsworthy;Prashant Jha;Lawrence E. Steckel;Robert C. Scott

  • Weed Control in Dicamba-Resistant Soybeans

    Bill Johnson;Bryan Young;Joe Matthews;Paul Marquardt

  • Late-Season Common Waterhemp (<i>Amaranthus rudis</i>) Interference in Narrow- and Wide-Row Soybean

    Unknown

  • Herbicide Program Approaches for Managing Glyphosate-Resistant Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) and Waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus and Amaranthus rudis) in Future Soybean-Trait Technologies

    Christopher J. Meyer;Jason K. Norsworthy;Bryan G. Young;Lawrence E. Steckel

  • Comparison of Glyphosate Salts (Isopropylamine, Diammonium, and Potassium) and Calcium and Magnesium Concentrations on the Control of Various Weeds'

    Thomas C. Mueller;Christopher L. Main;M. Angela Thompson;Lawrence E. Steckel

  • Glyphosate-resistant Horseweed (Conyza Canadensis) Control with Glufosinate Prior to Planting No-till Cotton (Gossypium Hirsutum)1

    Lawrence E. Steckel;C Chism Craig;Robert M. Hayes

  • Integrating Cover Crops and POST Herbicides for Glyphosate-Resistant Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) Control in Corn

    Matthew S. Wiggins;M. Angela McClure;Robert M. Hayes;Lawrence E. Steckel

  • Common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) control in corn (Zea mays) with single preemergence and sequential applications of residual herbicides

    Lawrence E. Steckel;Christy L. Sprague;Aaron G. Hager

  • High residue cover crops alone or with strategic tillage to manage glyphosate-resistant palmer amaranth (amaranthus palmeri) in Southeastern cotton (gossypium hirsutum)

    A.J. Price;C.D. Monks;A.S. Culpepper;L.M. Duzy

Frequent Co-Authors

Jason K. Norsworthy
Jason K. Norsworthy University of Arkansas at Fayetteville
Bryan G. Young
Bryan G. Young Purdue University West Lafayette
A. Stanley Culpepper
A. Stanley Culpepper University of Georgia
William S. Curran
William S. Curran Pennsylvania State University
Alan C. York
Alan C. York North Carolina State University
Patrick J. Tranel
Patrick J. Tranel University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
William G. Johnson
William G. Johnson Purdue University West Lafayette
Greg R. Kruger
Greg R. Kruger University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Robert L. Nichols
Robert L. Nichols Cotton (United States)
Shawn P. Conley
Shawn P. Conley University of Wisconsin–Madison

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Lawrence E. Steckel

Trending Scientists