What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
His primary areas of investigation include Ecology, Vegetation, Vegetation classification, Forestry and Environmental resource management.
His work on Taxon, Biodiversity and Niche as part of general Ecology research is frequently linked to Genome size and Vertebrate, thereby connecting diverse disciplines of science.
His work on Floristics as part of his general Vegetation study is frequently connected to Rank, thereby bridging the divide between different branches of science.
His Vegetation classification research incorporates elements of Vegetation types and Taxonomy.
His research investigates the connection between Forestry and topics such as Biome that intersect with problems in Agroforestry and Indian ocean.
The study incorporates disciplines such as Plant ecology, Plant community, Phytosociology and Environmental protection in addition to Environmental resource management.
His most cited work include:
- The vegetation of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland. (2001 citations)
- Refugia: identifying and understanding safe havens for biodiversity under climate change (585 citations)
- The vegetation of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland. Strelitzia 19 (547 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
Ladislav Mucina mainly focuses on Ecology, Vegetation, Botany, Plant community and Habitat.
His research in Biodiversity, Endemism, Ordination, Plant ecology and Range are components of Ecology.
His research on Biodiversity often connects related areas such as Identification.
His studies examine the connections between Vegetation and genetics, as well as such issues in Physical geography, with regards to Floristics.
His research integrates issues of Environmental data, Species richness, Woodland and Abiotic component in his study of Plant community.
His work focuses on many connections between Phytosociology and other disciplines, such as Nomenclature, that overlap with his field of interest in Forestry.
He most often published in these fields:
- Ecology (67.00%)
- Vegetation (46.00%)
- Botany (22.33%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2016-2021)?
- Ecology (67.00%)
- Vegetation (46.00%)
- Botany (22.33%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
Ecology, Vegetation, Botany, Habitat and Biodiversity are his primary areas of study.
His study in Ecosystem, Vascular plant, Woodland, Range and Abiotic component are all subfields of Ecology.
His Vegetation research includes elements of Grassland and Physical geography.
His work in the fields of Habitat, such as Global biodiversity, intersects with other areas such as Refugium.
His Biodiversity research incorporates themes from Identification and Big data.
His work carried out in the field of Plant community brings together such families of science as Environmental data, Sampling and Litter.
Between 2016 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- TRY plant trait database : Enhanced coverage and open access (179 citations)
- International Code of Phytosociological Nomenclature. 4th edition (39 citations)
- International Code of Phytosociological Nomenclature. 4th edition (39 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
Ladislav Mucina mostly deals with Vegetation, Ecology, Habitat, Biodiversity and Endemism.
His study looks at the intersection of Vegetation and topics like Cartography with Vegetation classification, Multispectral image and Feature.
His works in Intraspecific competition, Shrub, Vascular plant, Biome and Ecosystem are all subjects of inquiry into Ecology.
His Habitat research includes themes of Plant ecology, Proteaceae, Spatial heterogeneity and Grassland.
His study in Biodiversity is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Ecology, Identification, Functional ecology, Data integration and Ecosystem model.
Ladislav Mucina has included themes like Ecological island, Species diversity and Life history theory in his Endemism study.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
