World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
65
Citations
52685
World Ranking
2151
National Ranking
870

Kingtse C. Mo publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kingtse C. Mo sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 130 publications — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

Kingtse C. Mo D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kingtse C. Mo sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 65 D-Index — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Overview

Kingtse C. Mo is affiliated with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Environmental Science and Earth and Planetary Sciences, with particular emphasis on the subfields of Global and Planetary Change and Atmospheric Science.

The scientist's work concentrates on topics related to climate variability and models, hydrology and drought analysis, and meteorological phenomena and simulations. These areas reflect an intersection of atmospheric processes and water cycle dynamics, which are critical for understanding environmental changes and extreme weather events.

Kingtse C. Mo has contributed to academic literature with publications in prominent venues. Notably, their recent paper titled Prediction of Flash Droughts over the United States, published in 2020 in the Journal of Hydrometeorology, has been cited multiple times. This work addresses the prediction challenges associated with rapid-onset droughts, which are important for water resource management and agricultural planning.

The scientist has collaborated with other researchers in their field, including Dennis P. Lettenmaier, with whom they have co-authored work. Such collaborations indicate engagement with experts specializing in hydrology and related disciplines.

Publication venues associated with Kingtse C. Mo include:

  • Journal of Hydrometeorology

Main fields of study include:

  • Environmental Science
  • Earth and Planetary Sciences

Subfields of study are:

  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Atmospheric Science

Key topics of research are:

  • Climate variability and models
  • Hydrology and Drought Analysis
  • Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations

Recent notable publication:

  • Prediction of Flash Droughts over the United States, 2020, Journal of Hydrometeorology

Frequent co-authors:

  • Dennis P. Lettenmaier

Best Publications

  • The NCEP/NCAR 40-Year Reanalysis Project

    E. Kalnay;M. Kanamitsu;R. Kistler;W. Collins

  • Continental-scale water and energy flux analysis and validation for the North American Land Data Assimilation System project phase 2 (NLDAS-2): 1. Intercomparison and application of model products

    Youlong Xia;Kenneth Mitchell;Michael Ek;Justin Sheffield

  • Alternating Wet and Dry Conditions over South America during Summer

    Julia Nogués-Paegle;Kingtse C. Mo

  • Influence of the Great Plains Low-Level Jet on Summertime Precipitation and Moisture Transport over the Central United States

    R. W. Higgins;Y. Yao;E. S. Yarosh;J. E. Janowiak

  • Relationships between Low-Frequency Variability in the Southern Hemisphere and Sea Surface Temperature Anomalies

    Kingtse C. Mo

  • Causes and Predictability of the 2012 Great Plains Drought

    Martin P. Hoerling;J. Eischeid;Arun Kumar;R. Leung

  • The Pacific–South American Modes and Tropical Convection during the Southern Hemisphere Winter

    Kingtse C. Mo;R. Wayne Higgins

  • The Pacific–South American modes and their downstream effects

    Kingtse C. Mo;Julia N. Paegle

  • Statistics and Dynamics of Persistent Anomalies

    Kingtse C. Mo;Michael Ghil

  • A U.S. CLIVAR Project to Assess and Compare the Responses of Global Climate Models to Drought-Related SST Forcing Patterns: Overview and Results

    Siegfried Schubert;David Gutzler;Hailan Wang;Hailan Wang;Aiguo Dai

  • An Intercomparison of Drought Indicators Based on Thermal Remote Sensing and NLDAS-2 Simulations with U.S. Drought Monitor Classifications

    Martha C. Anderson;Christopher Hain;Jason Otkin;Xiwu Zhan

  • North American Climate in CMIP5 Experiments: Part III: Assessment of Twenty-First-Century Projections*

    Eric D. Maloney;Suzana J. Camargo;Edmund Chang;Brian Colle

  • Heat wave flash droughts in decline

    Kingtse C. Mo;Dennis P. Lettenmaier

  • North American Climate in CMIP5 experiments. Part I: Evaluation of historical simulations of continental and regional climatology

    Justin Sheffield;Andrew P. Barrett;Brian Colle;D. Nelun Fernando;D. Nelun Fernando

  • Intraseasonal Modulation of South American Summer Precipitation

    Julia N. Paegle;Lee A. Byerle;Kingtse C. Mo

  • Tropical-Extratropical Geopotential Height Teleconnections during the Northern Hemisphere Winter

    Unknown

  • Cluster analysis of multiple planetary flow regimes

    Kingtse Mo;Michael Ghil

  • Precipitation Deficit Flash Droughts over the United States

    Kingtse C. Mo;Dennis P. Lettenmaier

  • Intraseasonal oscillations in the global atmosphere. I - Northern Hemisphere and tropics

    Michael Ghil;Kingtse Mo

  • Blocking in the southern hemisphere

    Unknown

  • Interannual Variability of the U.S. Summer Precipitation Regime with Emphasis on the Southwestern Monsoon.

    R. W. Higgins;K. C. Mo;Y. Yao

  • Linkages between Summer Rainfall Variability over South America and Sea Surface Temperature Anomalies

    Julia N. Paegle;Kingtse C. Mo

  • Persistent North Pacific Circulation Anomalies and the Tropical Intraseasonal Oscillation

    R. Wayne Higgins;Kingtse C. Mo

Frequent Co-Authors

Dennis P. Lettenmaier
Dennis P. Lettenmaier University of California, Los Angeles
R. Wayne Higgins
R. Wayne Higgins National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Siegfried D. Schubert
Siegfried D. Schubert Goddard Space Flight Center
Masao Kanamitsu
Masao Kanamitsu University of California, San Diego
David S. Gutzler
David S. Gutzler University of New Mexico
Justin Sheffield
Justin Sheffield University of Southampton
Eric F. Wood
Eric F. Wood Princeton University
Rong Fu
Rong Fu University of California, Los Angeles
Annarita Mariotti
Annarita Mariotti National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Eugenia Kalnay
Eugenia Kalnay University of Maryland, College Park

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Environmental Sciences, there are diverse online degree options that can complement or expand your expertise. Many students look for flexibility and affordability in their education, which makes programs like most affordable online general studies degree programs an appealing choice. These degrees offer a broad foundation that can support various career shifts or interdisciplinary knowledge.

If you’re seeking a less intensive route to a bachelor’s degree while still engaging with relevant subjects, exploring the easiest degree to get might be beneficial. Some of these programs allow students to balance study with personal or professional commitments more easily.

For a more specialized focus in areas closely linked to Environmental Sciences, consider fields such as geoscience or GIS. Programs recognized among the online geoscience degree offerings provide in-depth knowledge about earth systems and natural processes. Meanwhile, best GIS undergraduate programs teach you critical spatial analysis skills used in environmental planning and management.

Pursuing any of these paths online can open doors to promising careers in environmental consultancy, resource management, or sustainability planning, all essential fields in today’s eco-conscious world.

Best Scientists Citing Kingtse C. Mo

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles