World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
80
Citations
19402
World Ranking
17283
National Ranking
8660

Kenneth M. Rosen publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kenneth M. Rosen sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 340 publications — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Kenneth M. Rosen D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kenneth M. Rosen sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 80 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Kenneth M. Rosen was a researcher affiliated with the University of Illinois at Chicago in the United States. Their research spanned multiple fields, primarily including Neuroscience, Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, and Nursing.

Their scholarly work focused on several specific subfields such as Neurology, Molecular Biology, and Nutrition and Dietetics. These areas of study reflect a multidisciplinary approach that integrated aspects of health sciences and molecular research.

Among the main topics Kenneth M. Rosen explored were Barrier Structure and Function Studies, S100 Proteins and Annexins, and Trace Elements in Health. These topics indicate a focus on biological barriers, protein function, and the role of trace elements in health processes.

Kenneth M. Rosen published research articles predominantly in the Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism, which also featured their recent papers.

  • The novel ROCK2 selective inhibitor NRL-1049 preserves the blood-brain barrier after acute injury, 2024, Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism

This paper reflects their engagement with blood-brain barrier research and the molecular mechanisms involved in acute injury scenarios.

Collaborations formed an important part of their research efforts. Frequent coauthors included Inge A. Mulder, Matt Abbinanti, Sarah A. Woller, Joerg Ruschel, and Jonathan M. Coutinho, highlighting interdisciplinary teamwork.

Best Publications

  • Demonstration of Dual A-V Nodal Pathways in Patients with Paroxysmal Supraventricular Tachycardia

    P Denes;D Wu;R C Dhingra;R Chuquimia

  • Clinical, electrocardiographic and electrophysiologic observations in patients with paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia.

    Delon Wu;Pablo Denes;Fernando Amat-Y-Leon;Ramesh Dhingra

  • The Effects of Cycle Length on Cardiac Refractory Periods in Man

    P Denes;D Wu;R Dhingra;R J Pietras

  • Left atrial transport function in myocardial infarction. Importance of its booster pump function.

    Shahbudin H. Rahimtoola;Ali Ehsani;M.Ziad Sinno;Henry S. Loeb

  • Cardiac conduction in patients with symptomatic sinus node disease.

    Kenneth M. Rosen;Henry S. Loeb;M. Ziad Sinno;Shahbudin H. Rahimtoola

  • The natural course of alcoholic cardiomyopathy.

    John G. Demakis;Aloysius Proskey;Shahbudin H. Rahimtoola;Mohammed Jamil

  • Normalization of bundle branch block patterns by distal His bundle pacing. Clinical and experimental evidence of longitudinal dissociation in the pathologic his bundle.

    N El-Sherif;F Amay-Y-Leon;C Schonfield;B J Scherlag

  • Dual atrioventricular nodal pathways. A common electrophysiological response.

    Pablo Denes;Delon Wu;Ramesh Dhingra;Fernando Amat-Y-Leon

  • Torsade de pointes due to quinidine: observations in 31 patients.

    Jerry L. Bauman;Robert A. Bauernfeind;Julie V. Hoff;Boris Strasberg

  • Arrhythmias documented by 24-hour continuous ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring in young women without apparent heart disease.

    Paul A. Sobotka;Joseph H. Mayer;Robert A. Bauernfeind;Charles Kanakis

  • Demonstration of dual atrioventricular nodal pathways in man

    Kenneth M. Rosen;Ashwin Mehta;Robert A. Miller

  • Acute Hemodynamic Effects of Dopamine in Patients with Shock

    Henry S. Loeb;Edward B. J. Winslow;Shahbudin H. Rahimtoola;Kenneth M. Rosen

  • Task force I: Standardization of terminology and interpretation

    Borys Surawicz;Herman Uhley;Raymond Borun;Michael Laks

  • Significance of the HV interval in 517 patients with chronic bifascicular block.

    R C Dhingra;E Palileo;B Strasberg;S Swiryn

  • Twenty-Four Hour Continuous ECG Recordings in Long-Distance Runners

    David A. Talan;Robert A. Bauernfeind;William W. Ashley;Charles Kanakis

  • Significance of block distal to the His bundle induced by atrial pacing in patients with chronic bifascicular block.

    R C Dhingra;C Wyndham;R Bauernfeind;S Swiryn

  • Normal Conduction Intervals and Responses in Sixty-One Patients Using His Bundle Recording and Atrial Pacing

    Ramesh C. Dhingra;Kenneth M. Rosen;Shahbudin H. Rahimtoola;Shahbudin H. Rahimtoola

  • The Effects of Propranolol on Induction of A-V Nodal Reentrant Paroxysmal Tachycardia

    Wu D;Denes P;Dhingra R;Khan A

  • Electrophysiological studies in patients with chronic recurrent ventricular tachycardia.

    P Denes;D Wu;R C Dhingra;R Amat-y-Leon

  • Effects of cycle length on atrial vulnerability.

    C R Wyndham;F Amat-y-Leon;D Wu;P Denes

Frequent Co-Authors

Prakash Deedwania
Prakash Deedwania United States Department of Veterans Affairs
Stuart Rich
Stuart Rich Northwestern University
Ali A. Ehsani
Ali A. Ehsani Washington University in St. Louis
Melvin M. Scheinman
Melvin M. Scheinman University of California, San Francisco
Barry M. Massie
Barry M. Massie University of California, San Francisco
Shahbudin H. Rahimtoola
Shahbudin H. Rahimtoola University of Southern California

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees and alternative career pathways is becoming increasingly popular for those interested in the medical field. These options offer flexibility, help reduce schooling duration, and can often be more affordable than traditional programs.

For advanced nursing careers, many professionals look for the shortest dnp program online, allowing them to reach a Doctor of Nursing Practice degree in less time. Others prioritize budget and select the cheapest dnp program to minimize the financial burden of advanced education.

Those seeking a quicker entry into nursing may consider an accelerated lpn program, which opens the door to patient care roles in just months. For students interested in mental health, the fastest psychiatric nurse practitioner program offers a specialized pathway to work with those facing psychiatric challenges.

Whether you’re aiming for an advanced degree or beginning your healthcare journey, these online programs can help you reach your goals at your own pace and on your terms.

Best Scientists Citing Kenneth M. Rosen

Recently Published Articles