World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Law and Political Science
China
2023
Award Badge
Political Science
China
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Political Science 37 636 581 348 304 110 7450

Kaifeng Yang publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Kaifeng Yang between 2001 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Kaifeng Yang published across 25 years, from 2001 to 2025, averaging 5 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2007. 7 of the 125 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2001 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2007. 2001: 3 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 5 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 15 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 1 publication 2018: 3 publications 2019: 1 publication 2020: 3 publications 2021: 7 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 1 publication 2025: 6 publications
2001 2025

125 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Kaifeng Yang: publications per year, 2001 to 2025
Year Publications
2001 3
2002 2
2003 4
2004 1
2005 5
2006 6
2007 15
2008 6
2009 7
2010 9
2011 6
2012 12
2013 3
2014 6
2015 4
2016 7
2017 1
2018 3
2019 1
2020 3
2021 7
2022 4
2023 3
2024 1
2025 6
Total 125
Download as CSV

Kaifeng Yang publication distribution in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Political Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kaifeng Yang sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
20 40 60 80
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 36–40 to 333+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 97. Most scientists, 97, have 333+ publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 106–110 publications, is where this scientist sits. 36–40 publications: 10 scientists 41–45 publications: 11 scientists 46–50 publications: 25 scientists 51–55 publications: 27 scientists 56–60 publications: 44 scientists 61–65 publications: 52 scientists 66–70 publications: 62 scientists 71–75 publications: 62 scientists 76–80 publications: 79 scientists 81–85 publications: 71 scientists 86–90 publications: 82 scientists 91–95 publications: 65 scientists 96–100 publications: 85 scientists 101–105 publications: 76 scientists 106–110 publications: 66 scientists 111–115 publications: 78 scientists 116–120 publications: 67 scientists 121–125 publications: 73 scientists 126–130 publications: 73 scientists 131–135 publications: 64 scientists 136–140 publications: 45 scientists 141–145 publications: 53 scientists 146–150 publications: 44 scientists 151–155 publications: 45 scientists 156–160 publications: 33 scientists 161–165 publications: 32 scientists 166–170 publications: 28 scientists 171–175 publications: 31 scientists 176–180 publications: 29 scientists 181–185 publications: 27 scientists 186–190 publications: 36 scientists 191–195 publications: 27 scientists 196–200 publications: 24 scientists 201–205 publications: 16 scientists 206–210 publications: 16 scientists 211–215 publications: 19 scientists 216–220 publications: 16 scientists 221–225 publications: 17 scientists 226–230 publications: 18 scientists 231–235 publications: 23 scientists 236–240 publications: 17 scientists 241–245 publications: 13 scientists 246–250 publications: 17 scientists 251–255 publications: 9 scientists 256–260 publications: 13 scientists 261–265 publications: 8 scientists 266–270 publications: 12 scientists 271–275 publications: 8 scientists 276–280 publications: 10 scientists 281–285 publications: 13 scientists 286–290 publications: 13 scientists 291–295 publications: 5 scientists 296–300 publications: 6 scientists 301–305 publications: 11 scientists 306–310 publications: 9 scientists 311–315 publications: 6 scientists 316–320 publications: 4 scientists 321–325 publications: 4 scientists 326–330 publications: 2 scientists 331–332 publications: 5 scientists 333+ publications: 97 scientists
36–40 publications 333+

This scientist: 110 publications — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Political Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 2,033 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
36–40 10
41–45 11
46–50 25
51–55 27
56–60 44
61–65 52
66–70 62
71–75 62
76–80 79
81–85 71
86–90 82
91–95 65
96–100 85
101–105 76
106–110 66 110
111–115 78
116–120 67
121–125 73
126–130 73
131–135 64
136–140 45
141–145 53
146–150 44
151–155 45
156–160 33
161–165 32
166–170 28
171–175 31
176–180 29
181–185 27
186–190 36
191–195 27
196–200 24
201–205 16
206–210 16
211–215 19
216–220 16
221–225 17
226–230 18
231–235 23
236–240 17
241–245 13
246–250 17
251–255 9
256–260 13
261–265 8
266–270 12
271–275 8
276–280 10
281–285 13
286–290 13
291–295 5
296–300 6
301–305 11
306–310 9
311–315 6
316–320 4
321–325 4
326–330 2
331–332 5
333+ 97
Download as CSV

Kaifeng Yang D-index placement in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kaifeng Yang sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 43 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 20 to 62+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 100. Most scientists, 100, have 62+ D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 20 D-Index: 76 scientists 21 D-Index: 79 scientists 22 D-Index: 84 scientists 23 D-Index: 68 scientists 24 D-Index: 88 scientists 25 D-Index: 82 scientists 26 D-Index: 76 scientists 27 D-Index: 75 scientists 28 D-Index: 99 scientists 29 D-Index: 96 scientists 30 D-Index: 96 scientists 31 D-Index: 81 scientists 32 D-Index: 86 scientists 33 D-Index: 81 scientists 34 D-Index: 84 scientists 35 D-Index: 72 scientists 36 D-Index: 58 scientists 37 D-Index: 53 scientists 38 D-Index: 48 scientists 39 D-Index: 40 scientists 40 D-Index: 40 scientists 41 D-Index: 32 scientists 42 D-Index: 26 scientists 43 D-Index: 25 scientists 44 D-Index: 33 scientists 45 D-Index: 33 scientists 46 D-Index: 17 scientists 47 D-Index: 21 scientists 48 D-Index: 22 scientists 49 D-Index: 18 scientists 50 D-Index: 19 scientists 51 D-Index: 19 scientists 52 D-Index: 15 scientists 53 D-Index: 14 scientists 54 D-Index: 10 scientists 55 D-Index: 13 scientists 56 D-Index: 9 scientists 57 D-Index: 11 scientists 58 D-Index: 12 scientists 59 D-Index: 10 scientists 60 D-Index: 5 scientists 61 D-Index: 7 scientists 62+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 62+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Political Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 2,033 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
20 76
21 79
22 84
23 68
24 88
25 82
26 76
27 75
28 99
29 96
30 96
31 81
32 86
33 81
34 84
35 72
36 58
37 53 37
38 48
39 40
40 40
41 32
42 26
43 25
44 33
45 33
46 17
47 21
48 22
49 18
50 19
51 19
52 15
53 14
54 10
55 13
56 9
57 11
58 12
59 10
60 5
61 7
62+ 100
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2023 - Research.com Law and Political Science in China Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Political Science in China Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Law and Political Science in China Leader Award

Overview

Kaifeng Yang is affiliated with Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey in the United States. Their research primarily falls within the Social Sciences, with a particular focus on Public Administration, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, and Economics and Econometrics.

The body of work includes contributions to Public Policy and Administration Research, Management and Organizational Studies, Local Government Finance and Decentralization, Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies, Social Capital and Networks, E-Government and Public Services, and Environmental Sustainability in Business.

Yang has published extensively in several academic journals. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Public Administration Review
  • The American Review of Public Administration
  • Public Performance & Management Review
  • Review of Public Personnel Administration
  • Governance

Their recent papers showcase a focus on governance challenges, leadership, public administration, and evidence-based management. Notable publications include:

  • "Unprecedented Challenges, Familiar Paradoxes: COVID-19 and Governance in a New Normal State of Risks" (2020, Public Administration Review)
  • "What Can COVID-19 Tell Us About Evidence-Based Management?" (2020, The American Review of Public Administration)

Other relevant works related to Yang's collaborative research environment include:

  • "A Meta-Analysis of the Government Performance-Trust Link: Taking Cultural and Methodological Factors into Account" (2021, Public Administration Review)
  • "Examining the Influence of Transformational Leadership and Green Culture on Pro-Environmental Behaviors: Empirical Evidence From Florida City Governments" (2021, Review of Public Personnel Administration)
  • "Multidimensional Publicness and Collaboration for Community Benefits: The Case of U.S. Hospitals" (2020, Public Administration Review)

Yang frequently collaborates with multiple co-authors, including Naon Min, Zhang Jia-sheng, Hui Li, Aisha Azhar, and Wenchi Wei.

Best Publications

  • The Performance–Trust Link: Implications for Performance Measurement

    Kaifeng Yang;Marc Holzer

  • Citizen Involvement Efforts and Bureaucratic Responsiveness: Participatory Values, Stakeholder Pressures, and Administrative Practicality

    Kaifeng Yang;Kathe Callahan

  • Public Administrators' Trust in Citizens: A Missing Link in Citizen Involvement Efforts

    Kaifeng Yang

  • Further Dissecting the Black Box of Citizen Participation: When Does Citizen Involvement Lead to Good Outcomes?

    Kaifeng Yang;Sanjay K. Pandey

  • The State of Public Strategic Management Research: A Selective Literature Review and Set of Future Directions

    John M. Bryson;Frances S. Berry;Kaifeng Yang

  • Performance Regimes Amidst Governance Complexity

    Donald P. Moynihan;Sergio Fernandez;Soonhee Kim;Kelly M. LeRoux

  • Managerial Effectiveness of Government Performance Measurement: Testing a Middle-Range Model

    Kaifeng Yang;Jun Yi Hsieh

  • Linking Management Reform with Employee Job Satisfaction: Evidence from Federal Agencies

    Kaifeng Yang;Anthony Kassekert

  • Performance Measurement and Improvement: an Assessment of the State of the Art

    Marc Holzer;Kaifeng Yang

  • ASSESSING CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT EFFORTS BY LOCAL GOVERNMENTS

    Kaifeng Yang;Kathe Callahan

  • Accountability When Hierarchical Authority Is Absent: Views From Public–Private Partnership Practitioners

    Muhittin Acar;Chao Guo;Kaifeng Yang

  • How Do Perceived Political Environment and Administrative Reform Affect Employee Commitment

    Kaifeng Yang;Sanjay K. Pandey

  • Trust and Citizen Involvement Decisions: Trust in Citizens, Trust in Institutions, and Propensity to Trust

    Kaifeng Yang

  • E-Government for Better Performance: Promises, Realities, and Challenges

    Kaifeng Yang;Seung-Yong Rho

  • Public Service Motivation (PSM) and Support for Citizen Participation: A Test of Perry and Vandenabeele’s Reformulation of PSM Theory

    David Coursey;Kaifeng Yang;Sanjay K. Pandey

  • Further Understanding Accountability in Public Organizations Actionable Knowledge and the Structure–Agency Duality

    Kaifeng Yang

  • Neoinstitutionalism and e-government: beyond Jane Fountain

    Kaifeng Yang

  • Motivational Bases and Emotional Labor: Assessing the Impact of Public Service Motivation

    Chih-Wei Hsieh;Kaifeng Yang;Kai-Jo Fu

  • Examining Perceived Honest Performance Reporting by Public Organizations: Bureaucratic Politics and Organizational Practice

    Kaifeng Yang

  • Introduction to the Symposium: Accountability and Performance Measurement: The Evolving Role of Nonprofits in the Hollow State

    Jennifer Alexander;Jeffrey L. Brudney;Kaifeng Yang

  • Contracting Capacity and Perceived Contracting Performance: Nonlinear Effects and the Role of Time

    Kaifeng Yang;Jun Yi Hsieh;Tzung Shiun Li

  • Overcoming Negative Media Coverage: Does Government Communication Matter?

    Brooke Fisher Liu;J. Suzanne Horsley;Kaifeng Yang

  • Work-Related Stressors and Health-Related Outcomes in Public Service Examining the Role of Public Service Motivation

    Bangcheng Liu;Kaifeng Yang;Kaifeng Yang;Wei Yu

Frequent Co-Authors

Marc Holzer
Marc Holzer Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Sanjay K. Pandey
Sanjay K. Pandey George Washington University
Jeffrey L. Brudney
Jeffrey L. Brudney University of North Carolina Wilmington
Bradley E. Wright
Bradley E. Wright University of Georgia
Sergio Fernandez
Sergio Fernandez Indiana University
Donald P. Moynihan
Donald P. Moynihan University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Richard C. Feiock
Richard C. Feiock Florida State University
Frances Stokes Berry
Frances Stokes Berry Florida State University
Kelly LeRoux
Kelly LeRoux University of Illinois at Chicago
Melvin J. Dubnick
Melvin J. Dubnick University of New Hampshire

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Political Science opens the door to a variety of related online degrees and exciting career options. For those looking to enhance their credentials quickly, consider enrolling in the shortest masters degree program to fast-track your advancement in public policy, government, or nonprofit sectors.

Cost is often a major factor when choosing a degree. Searching for the cheapest online school can make quality education more accessible and help you minimize student debt.

Political Science pairs well with interdisciplinary interests. Professionals with a background in environmental studies can explore diverse roles and salary ranges by reviewing jobs with elementary education and environmental science degree salary to understand potential opportunities beyond traditional political paths.

Analytical skills are vital for policy analysis and government research. Pursuing an online bachelor's degree mathematics can strengthen your quantitative expertise, enhancing your career potential in political data analysis, consulting, and more.

Best Scientists Citing Kaifeng Yang

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles