World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Best Female Scientists
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Best Female Scientists 115 716 682 70 66 612 50021
Medicine 115 4511 4231 441 421 611 53885

Juliet E. Compston publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Juliet E. Compston between 1977 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Juliet E. Compston published across 49 years, from 1977 to 2025, averaging 12.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 62 publications in 2013. 6 of the 617 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1977 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 62. Peak 62 publications in 2013. 1977: 1 publication 1978: 0 publications 1979: 1 publication 1980: 2 publications 1981: 1 publication 1982: 3 publications 1983: 2 publications 1984: 6 publications 1985: 6 publications 1986: 7 publications 1987: 9 publications 1988: 5 publications 1989: 9 publications 1990: 6 publications 1991: 10 publications 1992: 22 publications 1993: 18 publications 1994: 25 publications 1995: 24 publications 1996: 15 publications 1997: 12 publications 1998: 10 publications 1999: 13 publications 2000: 12 publications 2001: 13 publications 2002: 14 publications 2003: 13 publications 2004: 19 publications 2005: 13 publications 2006: 10 publications 2007: 16 publications 2008: 15 publications 2009: 31 publications 2010: 24 publications 2011: 25 publications 2012: 30 publications 2013: 62 publications 2014: 21 publications 2015: 15 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 16 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 14 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 4 publications
1977 2025

617 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Juliet E. Compston: publications per year, 1977 to 2025
Year Publications
1977 1
1978 0
1979 1
1980 2
1981 1
1982 3
1983 2
1984 6
1985 6
1986 7
1987 9
1988 5
1989 9
1990 6
1991 10
1992 22
1993 18
1994 25
1995 24
1996 15
1997 12
1998 10
1999 13
2000 12
2001 13
2002 14
2003 13
2004 19
2005 13
2006 10
2007 16
2008 15
2009 31
2010 24
2011 25
2012 30
2013 62
2014 21
2015 15
2016 12
2017 16
2018 11
2019 4
2020 14
2021 5
2022 5
2023 4
2024 2
2025 4
Total 617
Download as CSV

Juliet E. Compston publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Juliet E. Compston sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 601–620 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 611 publications — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396 611
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Juliet E. Compston D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Juliet E. Compston sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 114–115 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 115 D-Index — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393 115
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Best Female Scientists Award

Overview

Juliet E. Compston is affiliated with the University of Cambridge in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily centers on bone health, osteoporosis, and related medical fields, contributing extensively to medicine and its subfields such as orthopedics and sports medicine, molecular biology, surgery, oncology, and emergency medicine.

Their work covers a range of topics including:

  • Bone health and osteoporosis research
  • Bone metabolism and diseases
  • Bone health and treatments
  • Bone and joint diseases
  • HIV-related health complications and treatments
  • Hip and femur fractures
  • Nutrition and health in aging

Juliet E. Compston's publication record includes contributions to several prominent journals. The frequent venues for their research are:

  • Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
  • JBMR Plus
  • Archives of Osteoporosis
  • Therapeutic Advances in Musculoskeletal Disease
  • Calcified Tissue International

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Juliet E. Compston include:

  • UK clinical guideline for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis, 2022, Archives of Osteoporosis
  • 2019 update of the European AIDS Clinical Society Guidelines for treatment of people living with HIV version 10.0, 2020, HIV Medicine
  • Guidance for the assessment and management of prostate cancer treatment-induced bone loss. A consensus position statement from an expert group, 2020, Journal of bone oncology
  • Opportunistic diagnosis of osteoporosis, fragile bone strength and vertebral fractures from routine CT scans; a review of approved technology systems and pathways to implementation, 2021, Therapeutic Advances in Musculoskeletal Disease
  • Role of the Microbiome in Regulating Bone Metabolism and Susceptibility to Osteoporosis, 2021, Calcified Tissue International

The scientist frequently collaborates with other researchers in the field. Their most common co-authors include:

  • Nicholas C. Harvey
  • Cyrus Cooper
  • Kate A. Ward
  • Celia L. Gregson
  • Kenneth Poole

Best Publications

  • Osteoporosis in the European Union: medical management, epidemiology and economic burden. A report prepared in collaboration with the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) and the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industry Associations (EFPIA).

    E. Hernlund;A. Svedbom;M. Ivergård;Juliet E. Compston

  • Standardized nomenclature, symbols, and units for bone histomorphometry: A 2012 update of the report of the ASBMR Histomorphometry Nomenclature Committee

    David W Dempster;Juliet E Compston;Marc K Drezner;Francis H Glorieux

  • Strontium ranelate reduces the risk of nonvertebral fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis : Treatment of peripheral osteoporosis (TROPOS) study

    J Y. Reginster;E Seeman;M C. De Vernejoul;S Adami

  • Primer on the metabolic bone diseases and disorders of mineral metabolism

    John P. Bilezikian;Roger Bouillon;Thomas Clemens;Juliet Compston

  • Diagnosis and Management of Osteonecrosis of the Jaw: A Systematic Review and International Consensus

    Aliya A Khan;Archie Morrison;David A Hanley;Dieter Felsenberg

  • Osteoporosis in the European Union: a compendium of country-specific reports

    A. Svedbom;E. Hernlund;M. Ivergård;Juliet E. Compston

  • UK clinical guideline for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis

    J Compston;A Cooper;Cyrus Cooper;N Gittoes

  • Prevention and management of osteoporosis. Current trends and future prospects.

    Juliet E. Compston

  • Managing Osteoporosis in Patients on Long-Term Bisphosphonate Treatment: Report of a Task Force of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

    Robert A. Adler;Ghada El-Hajj Fuleihan;Douglas C. Bauer;Pauline M. Camacho

  • Sex Steroids and Bone

    Juliet E. Compston

  • Osteoporosis: burden, health care provision and opportunities in the EU: a report prepared in collaboration with the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) and the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industry Associations (EFPIA).

    O. Ström;F. Borgström;John A. Kanis;Juliet Compston

  • A framework for the development of guidelines for the management of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis

    S Lekamwasam;J D Adachi;D Agnusdei;J Bilezikian

  • Interpretation and use of FRAX in clinical practice

    J. A. Kanis;D. Hans;C. Cooper;C. Cooper;S. Baim

  • Obesity is not protective against fracture in postmenopausal women: GLOW.

    Juliet E. Compston;Nelson B. Watts;Roland D. Chapurlat;Cyrus Cooper

  • Comparison of Changes in Bone Density and Turnover with Abacavir-Lamivudine versus Tenofovir-Emtricitabine in HIV-Infected Adults: 48-Week Results from the ASSERT Study

    Hans-Jürgen Stellbrink;Chloe Orkin;Jose Ramon Arribas;Juliet Compston

  • A UK Consensus Group on management of glucocorticoid‐induced osteoporosis: an update

    R. Eastell;D. M. Reid;J. Compston;C. Cooper

  • Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women and men from the age of 50 years in the UK.

    Juliet E. Compston;Alun Cooper;Cyrus Cooper;Roger M. Francis

  • Estrogen receptors alpha and beta are differentially expressed in developing human bone.

    Sharyn Bord;Alan Horner;Sian Beavan;Juliet Compston

  • The effects of estrogen on osteoprotegerin, RANKL, and estrogen receptor expression in human osteoblasts.

    S Bord;D.C Ireland;S.R Beavan;J.E Compston

  • Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis: an update.

    Juliet Elizabeth Compston

Frequent Co-Authors

Cyrus Cooper
Cyrus Cooper University of Southampton
Eugene V. McCloskey
Eugene V. McCloskey University of Sheffield
Jonathan D. Adachi
Jonathan D. Adachi McMaster University
Roland Chapurlat
Roland Chapurlat Claude Bernard University Lyon 1
John A. Kanis
John A. Kanis Australian Catholic University
Bengt Jönsson
Bengt Jönsson Stockholm School of Economics
Susan L. Greenspan
Susan L. Greenspan University of Pittsburgh
Kenneth G. Saag
Kenneth G. Saag University of Alabama at Birmingham
Adolfo Diez-Perez
Adolfo Diez-Perez Autonomous University of Barcelona
Steven Boonen
Steven Boonen KU Leuven

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Thinking about expanding your options in healthcare beyond traditional medical school? Numerous affordable online degree programs can support your career in medicine, healthcare management, pharmacy, and health information technology. These pathways can be great alternatives for those seeking flexibility or specialized expertise.

For those interested in the administrative side of healthcare, consider exploring the cheapest mha programs online. These master's programs focus on leadership and management skills required in hospitals and medical organizations.

If you’re pursuing advanced practice nursing, there are many cheap online dnp programs designed for flexibility and cost-effectiveness. Similarly, students interested in pharmaceuticals can explore the cheapest online pharmacy school options to earn doctoral credentials from home.

For those intrigued by technology and data analysis in healthcare, healthcare informatics degree programs are an excellent way to gain skills that hospitals and clinics increasingly value.

No matter which path you choose, these affordable online degrees can open doors to diverse, rewarding roles within the healthcare sector.

Best Scientists Citing Juliet E. Compston

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles