World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Julien Labreuche

Julien Labreuche

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 87 13557 12757 431 408 483 31015

Julien Labreuche publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Julien Labreuche between 2003 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Julien Labreuche published across 24 years, from 2003 to 2026, averaging 23.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 70 publications in 2021. 25 of the 572 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 70. Peak 70 publications in 2021. 2003: 3 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 11 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 13 publications 2010: 15 publications 2011: 12 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 14 publications 2014: 15 publications 2015: 15 publications 2016: 26 publications 2017: 54 publications 2018: 33 publications 2019: 44 publications 2020: 56 publications 2021: 70 publications 2022: 50 publications 2023: 42 publications 2024: 39 publications 2025: 24 publications 2026: 1 publication
2003 2026

572 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Julien Labreuche: publications per year, 2003 to 2026
Year Publications
2003 3
2004 3
2005 7
2006 9
2007 11
2008 9
2009 13
2010 15
2011 12
2012 7
2013 14
2014 15
2015 15
2016 26
2017 54
2018 33
2019 44
2020 56
2021 70
2022 50
2023 42
2024 39
2025 24
2026 1
Total 572
Download as CSV

Julien Labreuche publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Julien Labreuche sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 481–500 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 483 publications — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713 483
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Julien Labreuche D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Julien Labreuche sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 86–87 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 87 D-Index — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960 87
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Julien Labreuche is affiliated with the University of Lille in France and has an extensive publication record primarily in the field of medicine, with a focus on epidemiology, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, neurology, surgery, and cardiology and cardiovascular medicine. Their work spans multiple areas in acute and critical care contexts.

Their recent published papers include:

  • High Prevalence of Obesity in Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) Requiring Invasive Mechanical Ventilation (2020, Obesity)
  • Pulmonary Embolism in Patients With COVID-19 (2020, Circulation)
  • Relationship between SARS-CoV-2 Infection and the Incidence of Ventilator-Associated Lower Respiratory Tract Infections: A European Multicenter Cohort Study (2021, Intensive Care Medicine)
  • Safety and Efficacy of Intensive Blood Pressure Lowering after Successful Endovascular Therapy in Acute Ischaemic Stroke (BP-TARGET): A Multicentre, Open-Label, Randomised Controlled Trial (2021, The Lancet Neurology)
  • Trial of Thrombectomy for Stroke with a Large Infarct of Unrestricted Size (2024, New England Journal of Medicine)

Labreuche has collaborated frequently with several coauthors, including:

  • Bertrand Lapergue
  • Benjamin Gory
  • Raphaël Blanc
  • Mikaël Mazighi
  • Michel Piotin

Their publications have appeared in multiple venues, notably:

  • Stroke
  • Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery
  • European Journal of Neurology
  • European Stroke Journal
  • Intensive Care Medicine

The main fields of study for Labreuche focus on medicine broadly, with considerable contributions to epidemiology, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, neurology, surgery, and cardiology and cardiovascular medicine.

Their research has concentrated on topics such as:

  • Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
  • Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
  • Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
  • Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications

Best Publications

  • Pulmonary Embolism in Patients With COVID-19: Awareness of an Increased Prevalence.

    Julien Poissy;Julien Goutay;Morgan Caplan;Erika Parmentier

  • Statins in Stroke Prevention and Carotid Atherosclerosis Systematic Review and Up-to-Date Meta-Analysis

    Pierre Amarenco;Julien Labreuche;Philippa Lavallée;Pierre-Jean Touboul

  • A transient ischaemic attack clinic with round-the-clock access (SOS-TIA): feasibility and effects.

    Philippa C Lavallée;Elena Meseguer;Halim Abboud;Lucie Cabrejo

  • Effect of Endovascular Contact Aspiration vs Stent Retriever on Revascularization in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke and Large Vessel Occlusion: The ASTER Randomized Clinical Trial.

    Bertrand Lapergue;Raphael Blanc;Benjamin Gory;Julien Labreuche

  • Lipid management in the prevention of stroke: review and updated meta-analysis of statins for stroke prevention.

    Pierre Amarenco;Julien Labreuche

  • Bariatric Surgery Reduces Features of Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis in Morbidly Obese Patients

    Guillaume Lassailly;Robert Caiazzo;David Buob;Marie Pigeyre

  • A Comparison of Two LDL Cholesterol Targets after Ischemic Stroke

    Amarenco P;Kim Js;Labreuche J;Charles H

  • Addition of brain and carotid imaging to the ABCD² score to identify patients at early risk of stroke after transient ischaemic attack: a multicentre observational study.

    Áine Merwick;Gregory W Albers;Pierre Amarenco;Ethem M Arsava

  • Comparison of intravenous alteplase with a combined intravenous–endovascular approach in patients with stroke and confirmed arterial occlusion (RECANALISE study): a prospective cohort study

    Mikael Mazighi;Jean Michel Serfaty;Julien Labreuche;Jean Pierre Laissy

  • Five-Year Risk of Stroke after TIA or Minor Ischemic Stroke.

    Pierre Amarenco;Philippa C Lavallée;Linsay Monteiro Tavares;Julien Labreuche

  • Meta-analysis of the effect of nicotinic acid alone or in combination on cardiovascular events and atherosclerosis

    Eric Bruckert;Julien Labreuche;Pierre Amarenco

  • High-density lipoprotein-cholesterol and risk of stroke and carotid atherosclerosis: A systematic review

    Pierre Amarenco;Julien Labreuche;Pierre-Jean Touboul

  • Liver transplantation in the most severely ill cirrhotic patients: A multicenter study in acute-on-chronic liver failure grade 3

    Florent Artru;Alexandre Louvet;Isaac Ruiz;Eric Levesque

  • Relationship between SARS-CoV-2 infection and the incidence of ventilator-associated lower respiratory tract infections: a European multicenter cohort study.

    Anahita Rouzé;Ignacio Martin-Loeches;Pedro Povoa;Pedro Povoa;Demosthenes Makris

  • Autopsy Prevalence of Intracranial Atherosclerosis in Patients With Fatal Stroke

    Mikael Mazighi;Julien Labreuche;Fernando Gongora-Rivera;Charles Duyckaerts

  • Addition of Brain Infarction to the ABCD2 Score (ABCD2I). A Collaborative Analysis of Unpublished Data on 4574 Patients

    Matthew F. Giles;Greg W. Albers;Pierre Amarenco;Murat M. Arsava

  • Carotid Intima-Media Thickness, Plaques, and Framingham Risk Score as Independent Determinants of Stroke Risk

    Pierre-Jean Touboul;Julien Labreuche;Eric Vicaut;Pierre Amarenco

  • Effect of Endovascular Contact Aspiration vs Stent Retriever on Revascularization in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke and Large Vessel Occlusion. The ASTER Randomized Clinical Trial

    B. Lapergue;R. Blanc;B. Gory;J. Labreuche

  • One-Year Risk of Stroke after Transient Ischemic Attack or Minor Stroke

    P. Amarenco;P.C. Lavallee;J. Labreuche

Frequent Co-Authors

Mikael Mazighi
Mikael Mazighi Université Paris Cité
Alain Duhamel
Alain Duhamel University of Lille
Pierre Amarenco
Pierre Amarenco Université Paris Cité
Charlotte Cordonnier
Charlotte Cordonnier University of Lille
Adnan H. Siddiqui
Adnan H. Siddiqui University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Bruno Mégarbane
Bruno Mégarbane Université Paris Cité
Didier Leys
Didier Leys University of Lille
Régis Bordet
Régis Bordet University of Lille
Dominique Turck
Dominique Turck University of Lille
Eric Vicaut
Eric Vicaut Université Paris Cité

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The landscape of medical education in the USA is evolving, offering aspiring healthcare professionals more flexible entry points and learning options. For instance, if you already hold a non-nursing bachelor’s degree, you might consider direct entry np programs for non nurses online, allowing for a seamless transition into advanced nursing practice without starting from scratch.

There are also direct entry nursing programs designed for students seeking a fast track into the nursing field. Many of these programs accommodate diverse educational backgrounds and may feature accelerated formats.

For those interested in administrative roles, numerous online medical coding classes with financial aid are available. These programs offer flexible schedules and financial support, making healthcare careers more accessible.

Students worried about standardized tests can find absn programs that don't require teas for admission. This allows qualified applicants to focus on their coursework and clinical experience, rather than test scores, as they pursue nursing degrees.

Best Scientists Citing Julien Labreuche

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles