World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Molecular Biology
Denmark
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Molecular Biology 73 1261 1123 10 10 130 25840

John Mundy publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by John Mundy between 1982 and 2019, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. John Mundy published across 38 years, from 1982 to 2019, averaging 3.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 9 publications in 2002. 2 of the 138 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1982 to 2019. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 9. Peak 9 publications in 2002. 1982: 1 publication 1983: 2 publications 1984: 2 publications 1985: 3 publications 1986: 5 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 2 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 6 publications 1991: 5 publications 1992: 4 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 5 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 9 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 1 publication
1982 2019

138 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
John Mundy: publications per year, 1982 to 2019
Year Publications
1982 1
1983 2
1984 2
1985 3
1986 5
1987 1
1988 2
1989 3
1990 6
1991 5
1992 4
1993 3
1994 3
1995 5
1996 2
1997 2
1998 2
1999 5
2000 6
2001 5
2002 9
2003 2
2004 3
2005 2
2006 5
2007 4
2008 6
2009 4
2010 6
2011 2
2012 3
2013 7
2014 2
2015 5
2016 3
2017 6
2018 1
2019 1
Total 138
Download as CSV

John Mundy publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Mundy sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 53 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 564+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 177. Most scientists, 177, have 117–126 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 127–136 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 564+

This scientist: 130 publications — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 7
57–66 17
67–76 65
77–86 90
87–96 125
97–106 131
107–116 162
117–126 177
127–136 158 130
137–146 158
147–156 146
157–166 159
167–176 131
177–186 110
187–196 112
197–206 100
207–216 89
217–226 98
227–236 74
237–246 72
247–256 63
257–266 53
267–276 54
277–286 49
287–296 52
297–306 43
307–316 46
317–326 41
327–336 42
337–346 31
347–356 28
357–366 29
367–376 26
377–386 24
387–396 24
397–406 14
407–416 13
417–426 20
427–436 12
437–446 20
447–456 11
457–466 10
467–476 14
477–486 14
487–496 10
497–506 13
507–516 13
517–526 2
527–536 4
537–546 6
547–556 8
557–563 6
564+ 100
Download as CSV

John Mundy D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Mundy sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100 125
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 145+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 131. Most scientists, 131, have 64–65 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 72–73 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40–41 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 73 D-Index — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 36
42–43 101
44–45 115
46–47 121
48–49 118
50–51 130
52–53 106
54–55 116
56–57 113
58–59 129
60–61 120
62–63 105
64–65 131
66–67 95
68–69 97
70–71 106
72–73 83 73
74–75 89
76–77 77
78–79 70
80–81 73
82–83 60
84–85 48
86–87 45
88–89 50
90–91 31
92–93 51
94–95 43
96–97 38
98–99 39
100–101 41
102–103 29
104–105 33
106–107 35
108–109 20
110–111 38
112–113 19
114–115 28
116–117 13
118–119 23
120–121 16
122–123 15
124–125 11
126–127 21
128–129 7
130–131 13
132–133 14
134–135 17
136–137 9
138–139 8
140–141 16
142–143 7
144 7
145+ 100
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Molecular Biology in Denmark Leader Award

Overview

John Mundy is affiliated with the University of Copenhagen in Denmark. Their academic profile reflects involvement in research activities, though specific details about their publication record, research topics, or fields of study are not documented in the available data.

There is no information provided regarding recent papers, co-authors, or frequent publication venues connected to John Mundy. Similarly, no records of book publications or detailed fields and subfields of study have been noted.

No explicit data on main topics of work or awards received by John Mundy are present. The absence of such information suggests the publicly available academic outputs and accolades are either limited or not disclosed in the accessible records.

John Mundy is currently active and not deceased. Their institutional affiliation situates them within a prominent European university, potentially contributing to research within that academic environment.

Best Publications

  • Mitogen-activated protein kinase cascades in plants: a new nomenclature

    Kazuya Ichimura;Kazuo Shinozaki;Guillaume Tena

  • Gene expression in response to abscisic acid and osmotic stress.

    Karen Skriver;John Mundy

  • Arabidopsis MAP Kinase 4 Negatively Regulates Systemic Acquired Resistance

    Morten Petersen;Peter Brodersen;Henrik Naested;Erik Andreasson

  • Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Signaling in Plants

    Maria Cristina Suarez Rodriguez;Morten Petersen;John Mundy

  • Common amino acid sequence domains among the LEA proteins of higher plants.

    Leon Dure;Martha Crouch;John Harada;Tuan-Hua David Ho

  • Recalibrating Equus evolution using the genome sequence of an early Middle Pleistocene horse.

    Ludovic Orlando;Aurelien Ginolhac;Guojie Zhang;Duane Froese

  • Abscisic acid and water-stress induce the expression of a novel rice gene.

    J. Mundy;Nam-Hai Chua

  • Biochemical and molecular characterization of three barley seed proteins with antifungal properties.

    R Leah;H Tommerup;I Svendsen;J Mundy

  • Enhanced quantitative resistance against fungal disease by combinatorial expression of different barley antifungal proteins in transgenic tobacco

    Guido Jach;Birgit Gornhardt;John Mundy;Jurgen Logemann

  • Morphological classification of plant cell deaths.

    W G van Doorn;E P Beers;J L Dangl;V E Franklin-Tong

  • The MAP kinase substrate MKS1 is a regulator of plant defense responses

    Erik Andreasson;Thomas Jenkins;Peter Brodersen;Stephan Thorgrimsen

  • Ancient signals: comparative genomics of plant MAPK and MAPKK gene families

    Louis-Philippe Hamel;Marie-Claude Nicole;Somrudee Sritubtim;Marie-Josée Morency

  • Arabidopsis MAP kinase 4 regulates gene expression through transcription factor release in the nucleus

    Jin Long Qiu;Berthe Katrine Fiil;Klaus Petersen;Henrik Bjørn Nielsen

  • Transcriptome responses to combinations of stresses in Arabidopsis.

    Simon Rasmussen;Pankaj Barah;Maria Cristina Suarez-Rodriguez;Simon Bressendorff

  • Arabidopsis MAP kinase 4 regulates salicylic acid- and jasmonic acid/ethylene-dependent responses via EDS1 and PAD4

    Peter Brodersen;Morten Petersen;Henrik Bjørn Nielsen;Shijiang Zhu

  • Nuclear proteins bind conserved elements in the abscisic acid-responsive promoter of a rice rab gene.

    John Mundy;Kazuko Yamaguchi-Shinozaki;Nam-Hai Chua

  • Knockout of Arabidopsis ACCELERATED-CELL-DEATH11 encoding a sphingosine transfer protein causes activation of programmed cell death and defense

    Peter Brodersen;Morten Petersen;Helen M. Pike;Brian Olszak

  • Autophagic Components Contribute to Hypersensitive Cell Death in Arabidopsis

    Daniel Hofius;Torsten Schultz-Larsen;Jan Joensen;Dimitrios I. Tsitsigiannis

  • Oil bodies and their associated proteins, oleosin and caleosin

    Gitte I. Frandsen;John Mundy;Jason T. C. Tzen

  • cis-acting DNA elements responsive to gibberellin and its antagonist abscisic acid.

    Karen Skriver;Finn Lok Olsen;John C. Rogers;John Mundy

Frequent Co-Authors

Morten Petersen
Morten Petersen University of Copenhagen
Ib Svendsen
Ib Svendsen Carlsberg Laboratory
Rhoderick E. Brown
Rhoderick E. Brown University of Minnesota
Nam-Hai Chua
Nam-Hai Chua National University of Singapore
Erik Andreasson
Erik Andreasson Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Atle M. Bones
Atle M. Bones Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Dinshaw J. Patel
Dinshaw J. Patel Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Simon Rasmussen
Simon Rasmussen University of Copenhagen
Mari-Anne Newman
Mari-Anne Newman University of Copenhagen
Kazuko Yamaguchi-Shinozaki
Kazuko Yamaguchi-Shinozaki University of Tokyo

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in Molecular Biology but want to explore related clinical or healthcare careers, numerous online degree options and pathways are available. For example, those with an associate degree in nursing can review asn to np bridge programs to advance their qualifications and diversify their clinical expertise.

Even if you don’t have a nursing background, accelerated direct entry msn programs for non nurses online allow motivated science graduates to transition into advanced healthcare roles. These flexible programs are especially valuable for individuals eager to leverage their molecular biology training in patient-centered settings.

Prospective students seeking maximum value can compare the best value nursing education online wgu and other top online universities. Careful comparison helps ensure you choose a reputable and affordable program that aligns with your career goals.

For those who already possess a Bachelor of Science in Nursing degree, advancing further is seamless with bsn to msn online programs. These accredited online pathways make it easier to gain specialized skills without putting your career on hold.

Best Scientists Citing John Mundy

Trending Scientists