World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Genetics 61 3066 2904 211 200 212 12943

Jochen Graw publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jochen Graw between 1977 and 2023, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jochen Graw published across 47 years, from 1977 to 2023, averaging 5.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2003. 21 of the 274 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1977 to 2023. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2003. 1977: 1 publication 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 3 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 3 publications 1985: 3 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 4 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 2 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 5 publications 1996: 7 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 8 publications 2002: 13 publications 2003: 16 publications 2004: 9 publications 2005: 14 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 14 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 13 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 7 publications 2022: 11 publications 2023: 10 publications
1977 2023

274 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jochen Graw: publications per year, 1977 to 2023
Year Publications
1977 1
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 3
1982 0
1983 0
1984 3
1985 3
1986 1
1987 0
1988 0
1989 4
1990 3
1991 2
1992 1
1993 2
1994 3
1995 5
1996 7
1997 5
1998 3
1999 4
2000 3
2001 8
2002 13
2003 16
2004 9
2005 14
2006 8
2007 5
2008 10
2009 14
2010 10
2011 10
2012 13
2013 12
2014 6
2015 8
2016 7
2017 7
2018 7
2019 7
2020 9
2021 7
2022 11
2023 10
Total 274
Download as CSV

Jochen Graw publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jochen Graw sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200
Bar chart with 67 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 45–54 to 703+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 217. Most scientists, 217, have 125–134 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 205–214 publications, is where this scientist sits. 45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45–54 publications 703+

This scientist: 212 publications — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
45–54 6
55–64 10
65–74 35
75–84 84
85–94 102
95–104 151
105–114 175
115–124 203
125–134 217
135–144 205
145–154 193
155–164 188
165–174 170
175–184 178
185–194 164
195–204 173
205–214 159 212
215–224 134
225–234 143
235–244 105
245–254 114
255–264 92
265–274 88
275–284 87
285–294 80
295–304 62
305–314 75
315–324 67
325–334 60
335–344 52
345–354 40
355–364 48
365–374 47
375–384 46
385–394 31
395–404 27
405–414 40
415–424 30
425–434 43
435–444 29
445–454 14
455–464 28
465–474 21
475–484 21
485–494 22
495–504 17
505–514 12
515–524 11
525–534 8
535–544 8
545–554 14
555–564 4
565–574 11
575–584 5
585–594 11
595–604 12
605–614 7
615–624 6
625–634 10
635–644 9
645–654 10
655–664 6
665–674 6
675–684 6
685–694 4
695–702 6
703+ 100
Download as CSV

Jochen Graw D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jochen Graw sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 160+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 191. Most scientists, 191, have 62–63 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 60–61 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40–41 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 61 D-Index — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 24
42–43 52
44–45 84
46–47 112
48–49 118
50–51 141
52–53 143
54–55 145
56–57 179
58–59 162
60–61 175 61
62–63 191
64–65 172
66–67 184
68–69 164
70–71 158
72–73 150
74–75 136
76–77 127
78–79 127
80–81 111
82–83 110
84–85 110
86–87 84
88–89 102
90–91 66
92–93 72
94–95 70
96–97 54
98–99 60
100–101 49
102–103 55
104–105 45
106–107 42
108–109 28
110–111 39
112–113 25
114–115 31
116–117 29
118–119 34
120–121 29
122–123 29
124–125 18
126–127 27
128–129 22
130–131 16
132–133 11
134–135 17
136–137 12
138–139 21
140–141 4
142–143 9
144–145 14
146–147 6
148–149 10
150–151 7
152–153 9
154–155 8
156–157 8
158–159 9
160+ 96
Download as CSV

Overview

Jochen Graw is affiliated with the Technical University of Munich in Germany. Their research primarily focuses on the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with a strong emphasis on subfields including Molecular Biology, Genetics, Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, and Aging.

The scientist's work covers several main topics, notably:

  • Connexins and lens biology
  • Retinal Development and Disorders
  • S100 Proteins and Annexins
  • Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
  • Adipose Tissue and Metabolism
  • Retinal Diseases and Treatments
  • Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques

Among the recent papers associated with Jochen Graw are:

  • Imbalances in the eye lens proteome are linked to cataract formation, 2021, Nature Structural & Molecular Biology
  • Deep phenotyping and lifetime trajectories reveal limited effects of longevity regulators on the aging process in C57BL/6J mice, 2022, Nature Communications
  • A comprehensive and comparative phenotypic analysis of the collaborative founder strains identifies new and known phenotypes, 2020, Mammalian Genome
  • Dose-dependent long-term effects of a single radiation event on behaviour and glial cells, 2020, International Journal of Radiation Biology
  • Genome-wide screening reveals the genetic basis of mammalian embryonic eye development, 2023, BMC Biology

Frequent co-authors who have collaborated with Jochen Graw include:

  • Henning Hintzsche
  • Martin Hrabé de Angelis
  • Helmut Fuchs
  • Sabine M. Hölter
  • Oana V. Amarie

Publication venues where Jochen Graw's work frequently appears include:

  • BIOspektrum
  • International Journal of Radiation Biology
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Experimental Eye Research
  • Nature Structural & Molecular Biology

Best Publications

  • A humanized version of Foxp2 affects cortico-basal ganglia circuits in mice

    Wolfgang Enard;Sabine Gehre;Kurt Hammerschmidt;Sabine M. Hölter

  • Germ-line mutations in p27Kip1 cause a multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome in rats and humans.

    Natalia S. Pellegata;Leticia Quintanilla-Martinez;Heide Siggelkow;Elenore Samson

  • A comparative phenotypic and genomic analysis of C57BL/6J and C57BL/6N mouse strains

    Michelle M Simon;Simon Greenaway;Jacqueline K White;Helmut Fuchs

  • Radiation cataractogenesis: a review of recent studies.

    E. A. Ainsbury;S. D. Bouffler;W. Dörr;J. Graw

  • Rapamycin extends murine lifespan but has limited effects on aging

    Frauke Neff;Diana Flores-Dominguez;Devon P. Ryan;Marion Horsch

  • Early developmental failure of substantia nigra dopamine neurons in mice lacking the homeodomain gene Pitx3.

    Marten P. Smidt;Simone M. Smits;Hans Bouwmeester;Frank P. T. Hamers

  • Genetics of crystallins: cataract and beyond.

    Jochen Graw

  • The genetic and molecular basis of congenital eye defects

    Jochen Graw

  • Deletion in the promoter region and altered expression of Pitx3 homeobox gene in aphakia mice

    Elena V. Semina;Jeffrey C. Murray;Rebecca Reiter;Ronald F. Hrstka

  • Prevalence of sexual dimorphism in mammalian phenotypic traits

    Natasha A. Karp;Natasha A. Karp;Jeremy Mason;Arthur L. Beaudet;Yoav Benjamini

  • Haemophilia A: from mutation analysis to new therapies

    Jochen Graw;Hans-Hermann Brackmann;Johannes Oldenburg;Reinhard Schneppenheim

  • The crystallins: genes, proteins and diseases.

    Graw J

  • Introducing the German Mouse Clinic: open access platform for standardized phenotyping

    Valérie Gailus-Durner;Helmut Fuchs;Lore Becker;Ines Bolle

  • Molecular dissection of Pax6 function: the specific roles of the paired domain and homeodomain in brain development

    Nicole Haubst;Joachim Berger;Venugopal Radjendirane;Jochen Graw

  • Genetic Aspects of Embryonic Eye Development in Vertebrates

    Jochen Graw

  • Congenital hereditary cataracts

    Jochen Graw

  • Altered aggregation properties of mutant γ-crystallins cause inherited cataract

    Aileen Sandilands;Aileen M. Hutcheson;Heather A. Long;Alan R. Prescott

  • Ionizing radiation induced cataracts: Recent biological and mechanistic developments and perspectives for future research.

    Elizabeth A. Ainsbury;Stephen Barnard;Scott Bright;Claudia Dalke

  • Analysis of mammalian gene function through broad-based phenotypic screens across a consortium of mouse clinics.

    Martin Hrabě de Angelis;George Nicholson;Mohammed Selloum;Jacqueline K White

  • A large scale hearing loss screen reveals an extensive unexplored genetic landscape for auditory dysfunction.

    Michael R. Bowl;Michelle M. Simon;Neil J. Ingham;Neil J. Ingham;Simon Greenaway

Frequent Co-Authors

Eckhard Wolf
Eckhard Wolf Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Helmut Fuchs
Helmut Fuchs Helmholtz Zentrum München
Valerie Gailus-Durner
Valerie Gailus-Durner Helmholtz Zentrum München
Martin Hrabé de Angelis
Martin Hrabé de Angelis Technical University of Munich
Wolfgang Wurst
Wolfgang Wurst German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases
Martin Klingenspor
Martin Klingenspor Technical University of Munich
Dirk H. Busch
Dirk H. Busch Technical University of Munich
Thomas Klopstock
Thomas Klopstock Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Jerzy Adamski
Jerzy Adamski Helmholtz Association of German Research Centres
Johannes Beckers
Johannes Beckers Technical University of Munich

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you are interested in genetics or bioscience, there are several online degree options and fast-track career pathways to consider. Many healthcare-related fields offer flexible learning, ideal for students balancing work or family commitments. For example, the rn to bsn no practicum pathway allows registered nurses to complete their Bachelor of Science in Nursing degree online, without the need for additional clinical hours.

Nursing professionals interested in advancing further can pursue a 12 month dnp program online, which prepares them for high-level clinical or leadership roles in under a year. Additionally, those seeking quick entry into healthcare can explore an accelerated cma program—some of which can be completed in as little as six weeks.

For aspiring nurse leaders, there are options like the easiest online dnp programs designed to be more accessible while still providing the advanced expertise required. Together, these online educational routes make it possible to enter or advance within medical science and genetics-related careers in less time and with greater flexibility.

Best Scientists Citing Jochen Graw

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles