World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 115 4551 2471 575 48479

Jesse E. Edwards publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jesse E. Edwards between 1950 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jesse E. Edwards published across 76 years, from 1950 to 2025, averaging 7.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 28 publications in 1964. 1 of the 569 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1950 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 28. Peak 28 publications in 1964. 1950: 7 publications 1951: 12 publications 1952: 10 publications 1953: 9 publications 1954: 4 publications 1955: 11 publications 1956: 6 publications 1957: 7 publications 1958: 20 publications 1959: 8 publications 1960: 12 publications 1961: 21 publications 1962: 25 publications 1963: 19 publications 1964: 28 publications 1965: 19 publications 1966: 22 publications 1967: 19 publications 1968: 15 publications 1969: 15 publications 1970: 15 publications 1971: 18 publications 1972: 16 publications 1973: 19 publications 1974: 26 publications 1975: 15 publications 1976: 26 publications 1977: 8 publications 1978: 13 publications 1979: 6 publications 1980: 11 publications 1981: 10 publications 1982: 12 publications 1983: 8 publications 1984: 10 publications 1985: 3 publications 1986: 10 publications 1987: 7 publications 1988: 9 publications 1989: 8 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 4 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 2 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 1 publication 2000: 1 publication 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 0 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 0 publications 2009: 0 publications 2010: 0 publications 2011: 0 publications 2012: 0 publications 2013: 0 publications 2014: 0 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 0 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 0 publications 2025: 1 publication
1950 2025

569 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jesse E. Edwards: publications per year, 1950 to 2025
Year Publications
1950 7
1951 12
1952 10
1953 9
1954 4
1955 11
1956 6
1957 7
1958 20
1959 8
1960 12
1961 21
1962 25
1963 19
1964 28
1965 19
1966 22
1967 19
1968 15
1969 15
1970 15
1971 18
1972 16
1973 19
1974 26
1975 15
1976 26
1977 8
1978 13
1979 6
1980 11
1981 10
1982 12
1983 8
1984 10
1985 3
1986 10
1987 7
1988 9
1989 8
1990 0
1991 0
1992 1
1993 4
1994 0
1995 2
1996 1
1997 2
1998 1
1999 1
2000 1
2001 0
2002 0
2003 1
2004 0
2005 2
2006 9
2007 0
2008 0
2009 0
2010 0
2011 0
2012 0
2013 0
2014 0
2015 1
2016 0
2017 2
2018 0
2019 0
2020 0
2021 0
2022 0
2023 1
2024 0
2025 1
Total 569
Download as CSV

Jesse E. Edwards publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jesse E. Edwards sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 561–580 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 575 publications — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504 575
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Jesse E. Edwards D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jesse E. Edwards sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 114–115 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 115 D-Index — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393 115
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Jesse E. Edwards was affiliated with the University of Minnesota in the United States. Their research primarily focused on the fields of medicine, with specific contributions in transplantation, hematology, and nephrology.

Throughout their career, Edwards published notably on topics related to renal transplantation outcomes and treatments, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, and renal diseases and glomerulopathies. This focus is reflected in their recent publications and thematic areas of study.

Edwards authored at least two recent papers:

  • "Influence of Pre-Transplant Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) on Outcomes after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation" published in 2023 in the journal Blood
  • "Influence of pre-transplant estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) on clinical outcomes after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation" published in 2025 in Bone Marrow Transplantation

Their work contributed to understanding factors affecting clinical outcomes in hematopoietic cell transplantation, specifically exploring the role of kidney function as measured by eGFR prior to transplantation.

Edwards collaborated frequently with a group of co-authors, including Ronald Sobecks, Danielle Cenin, Seema Patel, Stephanie Farlow, and Rabi Hanna. These partnerships appeared consistently across multiple projects, indicating ongoing research relationships.

In terms of publication venues, Edwards' research appeared primarily in:

  • Blood
  • Bone Marrow Transplantation

The significant overlap between their fields of study and main research topics highlighted a focused investigation into transplant-related medical outcomes and renal function implications in hematologic therapies.

Best Publications

  • A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association

    WG Austen;JE Edwards;RL Frye;GG Gensini

  • Risk Stratification and Survival after Myocardial Infarction

    Roger Lester;Arthur J. Moss;J. Thomas Bigger;Robert B. Case

  • The pathology of hypertensive pulmonary vascular disease. A description of six grades of structural changes in the pulmonary arteries with special reference to congenital cardiac septal defects

    Donald Heath;Jesse E. Edwards

  • The developmental complex of "parachute mitral valve", supravalvular ring of left atrium, subaortic stenosis, and coarctation of aorta

    John D. Shone;Robert D. Sellers;Ray C. Anderson;Paul Adams

  • The mechanism of balloon angioplasty.

    W. R. Castaneda-Zuniga;A. Formanek;S Murthy Tadavarthy;Z. Vlodaver

  • Correlation of the Antemortem Coronary Arteriogram and the Postmortem Specimen

    Zeev Vlodaver;Robert Frech;Robert A. Van Tassel;Jesse E. Edwards

  • Evaluation of a QRS scoring system for estimating myocardial infarct size

    Steven F. Roark;Raymond E. Ideker;Galen S. Wagner;Daniel R. Alonso

  • The pathological anatomy of deficiencies between the aortic root and the heart, including aortic sinus aneurysms.

    Jesse E. Edwards;Howard B. Burchell

  • TERMINATION OF LEFT SUPERIOR VENA CAVA IN LEFT ATRIUM, ATRIAL SEPTAL DEFECT, AND ABSENCE OF CORONARY SINUS; A DEVELOPMENTAL COMPLEX.

    Gunay Raghib;Herbert D. Ruttenberg;Ray C. Anderson;Kurt Amplatz

  • Polysplenia: a review of 146 cases.

    William M. Peoples;James H. Moller;Jesse E. Edwards

  • Congenital cardiac disease associated with polysplenia. A developmental complex of bilateral "left-sidedness".

    James H. Moller;Ahmad Nakib;Ray C. Anderson;Jesse E. Edwards

  • Pathologic Changes in Aortic-Coronary Arterial Saphenous Vein Grafts

    Zeev Vlodaver;Jesse E. Edwards

  • Right aortic arch. Types and associated cardiac anomalies.

    Laura Knight;Jesse E. Edwards

  • The Relationship of the Degree of Coronary Atherosclerosis with Age, in Men

    Neil K. White;Jesse E. Edwards;Thomas J. Dry

  • Secondary Malignant Tumors of the Pericardium

    Deloran L. Thurber;Jesse E. Edwards;Richard W. P. Achor

  • Rupture of Heart Complicating Myocardial Infarction: Analysis of 40 Cases including Nine Examples of Left Ventricular False Aneurysm

    Robert A. Van Tassel;Jesse E. Edwards

  • Sudden death in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: Characterization of 26 patients without functional limitation

    Barry J. Maron;Barry J. Maron;William C. Roberts;William C. Roberts;Jesse E. Edwards;Jesse E. Edwards;Hugh A. McAllister;Hugh A. McAllister

  • Anomalies associated with coarctation of aorta: particular reference to infancy.

    Anton E. Becker;Mies J. Becker;Jesse E. Edwards

  • Pathology of coronary atherosclerosis.

    Zeev Vlodaver;Jesse E. Edwards

  • The Degree of Coronary Atherosclerosis in Bilaterally Oophorectomized Women

    John H. Wuest;Thomas J. Dry;Jesse E. Edwards

Frequent Co-Authors

Kurt Amplatz
Kurt Amplatz University of Minnesota
John W. Kirklin
John W. Kirklin University of Alabama at Birmingham
Anton E. Becker
Anton E. Becker University of Amsterdam
Paul D. Adams
Paul D. Adams Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Aldo R. Castaneda
Aldo R. Castaneda Boston Children's Hospital
James E. Lock
James E. Lock Stanford University
Barry J. Maron
Barry J. Maron University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School
Stephen E. Epstein
Stephen E. Epstein MedStar Health
Robert J. Gorlin
Robert J. Gorlin University of Minnesota

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a medical career in the USA requires commitment and planning, but flexible online options make it more accessible than ever. For registered nurses looking to advance, rn to bsn online programs without clinicals offer a streamlined way to earn a bachelor’s degree, often without the need for in-person placements.

For those aiming for leadership or specialized roles, many nurses choose online Doctor of Nursing Practice pathways. There are accelerated msn to dnp programs that can fast-track your qualifications, and online dnp programs without clinicals that accommodate working professionals who need flexibility.

If you're interested in entering healthcare quickly, what is the fastest way to become an lpn explores speedy options for becoming a Licensed Practical Nurse. These online programs can help you begin your medical journey faster.

Overall, online degrees in nursing and allied health provide a wide range of flexible pathways, letting you balance career advancement with your personal commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Jesse E. Edwards

Recently Published Articles