World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Jean-Claude Latombe

Jean-Claude Latombe

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
80
Citations
44264
World Ranking
1050
National Ranking
561

Jean-Claude Latombe publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jean-Claude Latombe sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 226 publications — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Jean-Claude Latombe D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jean-Claude Latombe sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 80 D-Index — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2021 - IEEE Robotics & Automation Award “For foundational contributions to robot motion planning and visionary leadership of the field.”
  • 1993 - Fellow of the Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI) For contributions to robotics, particularly the theory and practice of robot motion planning.

Overview

Jean-Claude Latombe is affiliated with Stanford University in the United States. Their academic work centers on robotics and artificial intelligence, with a particular focus on the theory and practice of robot motion planning.

Throughout their career, Jean-Claude Latombe has received notable recognition from professional organizations in the field. In 1993, they were named a Fellow of the Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI) for contributions to robotics, specifically in the domain of robot motion planning. More recently, in 2021, they received the IEEE Robotics & Automation Award. This award cited their foundational contributions to robot motion planning and their leadership within the field.

Jean-Claude Latombe's research presence is primarily associated with Stanford University, where their work has contributed to advancing knowledge in robotics. While specific details on recent papers, frequent co-authors, and publication venues are not listed, their recognition by major organizations indicates ongoing involvement and impact in the robotics research community.

Best Publications

  • Robot Motion Planning

    Jean-Claude Latombe

  • Probabilistic roadmaps for path planning in high-dimensional configuration spaces

    L.E. Kavraki;P. Svestka;J.-C. Latombe;M.H. Overmars

  • Principles of Robot Motion: Theory, Algorithms, and Implementations

    Howie M. Choset;Jean-Claude Latombe

  • Robot motion planning: a distributed representation approach

    Jérîme Barraquand;Jean-Claude Latombe

  • PATH PLANNING IN EXPANSIVE CONFIGURATION SPACES

    David Hsu;Jean-Claude Latombe;Rajeev Motwani

  • Numerical potential field techniques for robot path planning

    J. Barraquand;B. Langlois;J.-C. Latombe

  • Randomized Kinodynamic Motion Planning with Moving Obstacles

    David Hsu;Robert Kindel;Jean-Claude Latombe;Stephen M. Rock

  • Navigation Strategies for Exploring Indoor Environments

    Héctor H. González-Baños;Jean-Claude Latombe

  • Randomized preprocessing of configuration for fast path planning

    L. Kavraki;J.-C. Latombe

  • Nonholonomic multibody mobile robots: Controllability and motion planning in the presence of obstacles

    Jérôme Barraquand;Jean Claude Latombe

  • On finding narrow passages with probabilistic roadmap planners

    David Hsu;Lydia E. Kavraki;Jean-Claude Latombe;Rajeev Motwani

  • Analysis of probabilistic roadmaps for path planning

    L.E. Kavraki;M.N. Kolountzakis;J.-C. Latombe

  • A Single-Query Bi-Directional Probabilistic Roadmap Planner with Lazy Collision Checking

    Gildardo Sánchez;Jean-Claude Latombe

  • A random sampling scheme for path planning

    Jér ocirc Barraquand;Lydia Kavraki;Jean-Claude Latombe;Rajeev Motwani

  • A visibility-based pursuit-evasion problem

    Leonidas J. Guibas;Jean Claude Latombe;Steven M. Lavalle;David Lin

  • Planning motions with intentions

    Yoshihito Koga;Koichi Kondo;James Kuffner;Jean-Claude Latombe

  • Geometric reasoning about mechanical assembly

    Randall H. Wilson;Jean-Claude Latombe

  • Randomized Query Processing in Robot Path Planning

    Lydia E. Kavraki;Jean-Claude Latombe;Rajeev Motwani;Prabhakar Raghavan

  • Motion Planning: A Journey of Robots, Molecules, Digital Actors, and Other Artifacts

    Jean-Claude Latombe

  • On the Probabilistic Foundations of Probabilistic Roadmap Planning

    David Hsu;Jean-Claude Latombe;Hanna Kurniawati

  • Image-Guided Robotic Radiosurgery.

    John R. Adler;Achim Schweikard;Rhea Tombropoulos;Jean-Claude Latombe

Frequent Co-Authors

David Hsu
David Hsu National University of Singapore
Lydia E. Kavraki
Lydia E. Kavraki Rice University
Rajeev Motwani
Rajeev Motwani Stanford University
Kris Hauser
Kris Hauser Duke University
Stephen M. Rock
Stephen M. Rock Stanford University
Timothy Bretl
Timothy Bretl University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Dan Halperin
Dan Halperin Tel Aviv University
Douglas L. Brutlag
Douglas L. Brutlag Stanford University
John R. Adler
John R. Adler Stanford University
Kincho H. Law
Kincho H. Law Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online computer science degrees opens up a variety of educational and career options. For those eager to accelerate their journey, the quickest degree to get online can provide a fast track into the tech field without sacrificing quality. These programs are ideal if you need flexibility and want to enter the workforce sooner.

Specializing can also boost your earning potential. An ai degree online is a cutting-edge choice, providing skills in a rapidly growing area with high demand across industries like finance, healthcare, and robotics.

When choosing your path, it’s wise to consider the top 10 best majors for the future, many of which intersect with technology and data science. These majors offer strong job prospects and higher salaries after graduation.

For advancing your credentials, targeting the easiest master degree to get can provide a practical option for career growth and new opportunities—especially if you prefer a more manageable workload.

Best Scientists Citing Jean-Claude Latombe

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles