World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
80
Citations
22780
World Ranking
17138
National Ranking
8586

Jean C. Emond publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jean C. Emond sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 344 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Jean C. Emond D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jean C. Emond sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 80 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jean C. Emond is affiliated with Columbia University in the United States and has contributed extensively to the field of medicine, with a specific focus on surgery and hepatology. Their research spans several key subfields including epidemiology, infectious diseases, and public health.

The scientist's work prominently covers topics related to organ transplantation techniques and outcomes, liver disease diagnostics and treatment, and the clinical management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Additional focus areas include organ donation and transplantation as well as renal transplantation outcomes and treatments. Recent research themes also encompass COVID-19 clinical research studies.

Jean C. Emond has published in various respected venues, frequently contributing to the following journals:

  • Transplantation
  • American Journal of Transplantation
  • HPB
  • Annals of Surgery
  • JAMA Surgery

Some notable recent papers authored or coauthored by Emond include:

  • "COVID-19 in solid organ transplant recipients: Initial report from the US epicenter," published in 2020 in the American Journal of Transplantation
  • "Ten-Year Outcomes of Liver Transplant and Downstaging for Hepatocellular Carcinoma," 2022, JAMA Surgery
  • "Global Transplantation COVID Report March 2020," 2020, Transplantation
  • "COVID-19-Associated Hepatitis Complicating Recent Living Donor Liver Transplantation," 2020, Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine
  • "Dynamic α-Fetoprotein Response and Outcomes After Liver Transplant for Hepatocellular Carcinoma," 2021, JAMA Surgery

Frequent coauthors who have collaborated with Jean C. Emond include Benjamin Samstein, Elizabeth C. Verna, Jan Lerut, Prashant Bhangui, and Mohamed Rela. These collaborations reflect ongoing work in transplantation and related surgical outcomes.

Emond's publication record indicates a concentration on the clinical aspects and outcomes of transplantation, particularly liver transplantation, with additional engagement in understanding the impacts of infectious diseases such as COVID-19 on transplant recipients.

Best Publications

  • Validation of a current definition of early allograft dysfunction in liver transplant recipients and analysis of risk factors

    Kim M. Olthoff;Laura Kulik;Benjamin Samstein;Mary Kaminski

  • COVID-19 in solid organ transplant recipients: Initial report from the US epicenter.

    Marcus R. Pereira;Sumit Mohan;David J. Cohen;Syed A. Husain

  • Liver transplantation in children from living related donors. Surgical techniques and results.

    Christoph E. Broelsch;Peter F. Whitington;Jean C. Emond;Thomas G. Heffron

  • Application of reduced-size liver transplants as split grafts, auxiliary orthotopic grafts, and living related segmental transplants.

    C E Broelsch;J C Emond;P F Whitington;J R Thistlethwaite

  • Hypothermic Machine Preservation in Human Liver Transplantation: The First Clinical Series

    J. V. Guarrera;S. D. Henry;B. Samstein;R. Odeh‐Ramadan

  • Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation, Followed by Liver Transplantation, for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma at 12 US Centers

    Sarwa Darwish Murad;W. Ray Kim;Denise M. Harnois;David D. Douglas

  • The risk of transmission of hepatitis B from HBsAg(-), HBcAb(+), HBIgM(-) organ donors.

    Michael E. Wachs;William J. Amend;Nancy L. Ascher;Peter N. Bretan

  • Donor morbidity after living donation for liver transplantation.

    Rafik M. Ghobrial;Chris E. Freise;James F. Trotter;Lan Tong

  • Survival outcomes following liver transplantation (SOFT) score: a novel method to predict patient survival following liver transplantation.

    A. Rana;M. A. Hardy;K. J. Halazun;D. C. Woodland

  • Functional analysis of grafts from living donors. Implications for the treatment of older recipients.

    Jean C. Emond;John F. Renz;Linda D. Ferrell;Philip Rosenthal

  • Negative impact of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio on outcome after liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma.

    Karim J. Halazun;Mark A. Hardy;Abbas A. Rana;David C. Woodland

  • Report of the Crystal City Meeting to Maximize the Use of Organs Recovered from the Cadaver Donor

    Bruce R. Rosengard;Sandy Feng;Edward J. Alfrey;Jonathan G. Zaroff

  • Managing the prevention of retained surgical instruments: what is the value of counting?

    Natalia N. Egorova;Alan Moskowitz;Annetine Gelijns;Alan Weinberg

  • Ethics of liver transplantation with living donors

    P.A. Singer;M. Siegler;P.F. Whitington;J.D. Lantos

  • Outcomes of 385 Adult-to-Adult Living Donor Liver Transplant Recipients: A Report From the A2ALL Consortium

    Kim M. Olthoff;Robert M. Merion;Rafik M. Ghobrial;Michael M. Abecassis

  • Transplantation of two Patients with one liver: Analysis of a preliminary experience with 'Split-liver' grafting

    J C Emond;P F Whitington;J R Thistlethwaite;D Cherqui

  • Hypothermic Machine Preservation Facilitates Successful Transplantation of “Orphan” Extended Criteria Donor Livers

    J. V. Guarrera;S. D. Henry;B. Samstein;E. Reznik

  • Recipient Morbidity After Living and Deceased Donor Liver Transplantation: Findings from the A2ALL Retrospective Cohort Study

    C. E. Freise;B. W. Gillespie;A. J. Koffron;A. S F Lok

  • Recurrence After Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A New MORAL to the Story.

    Karim J. Halazun;Marc Najjar;Rita M. Abdelmessih;Benjamin Samstein;Benjamin Samstein

  • Model for end-stage liver disease and Child-Turcotte-Pugh score as predictors of pretransplantation disease severity, posttransplantation outcome, and resource utilization in United Network for Organ Sharing status 2A patients.

    Robert S. Brown;Robert S. Brown;K. Shiva Kumar;Mark W. Russo;Mark W. Russo;Milan Kinkhabwala;Milan Kinkhabwala

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert S. Brown
Robert S. Brown Cornell University
Nancy L. Ascher
Nancy L. Ascher University of California, San Francisco
Kim M. Olthoff
Kim M. Olthoff University of Pennsylvania
Robert A. Fisher
Robert A. Fisher Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
John P. Roberts
John P. Roberts University of California, San Francisco
Ann Marie Schmidt
Ann Marie Schmidt New York University
Brenda W. Gillespie
Brenda W. Gillespie University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Abraham Shaked
Abraham Shaked University of Pennsylvania
Robert M. Merion
Robert M. Merion University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Alfred I. Neugut
Alfred I. Neugut Columbia University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative or supplementary pathways in the medical field can open up more flexible options for students. Many individuals are looking for online programs that offer convenience, affordability, and an expedited route to advancing their healthcare careers.

For registered nurses interested in furthering their education, some universities now offer rn to bsn online without clinicals programs, removing the need for additional clinical hours. Advanced nursing roles, such as nurse practitioners, may consider enrolling in the fastest dnp online program to accelerate their doctorate studies.

Cost is often a key concern, but aspiring nurses and practitioners can find cheapest dnp programs online that maintain academic quality while remaining affordable. Those seeking a quicker pathway into healthcare may start their journey with a fast track medical lpn program, ideal for entering the workforce sooner.

These diverse online options allow prospective and current medical professionals to choose a pathway that fits their goals, budget, and timeline.

Best Scientists Citing Jean C. Emond

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles