World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
K. G. M. M. Alberti

K. G. M. M. Alberti

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
89
Citations
73417
World Ranking
12406
National Ranking
1165

K. G. M. M. Alberti publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where K. G. M. M. Alberti sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 513 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

K. G. M. M. Alberti D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where K. G. M. M. Alberti sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 89 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

K. G. M. M. Alberti is a researcher affiliated with Newcastle University in the United Kingdom. Their work primarily focuses on the field of Medicine with a specialization in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Ophthalmology, and Nephrology. The scientist's research interests broadly cover Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins, Retinal Diseases and Treatments, as well as Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes.

The recent publications of K. G. M. M. Alberti include the following papers:

  • Diagnosing type 2 diabetes using Hemoglobin A1c: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic cutpoint based on microvascular complications, 2020, Acta Diabetologica
  • discovery of insulin, 2022, British Journal of Diabetes

These publications are contributed alongside several coauthors who frequently collaborate with Alberti. The notable coauthors include:

  • Alexandra E. Butler
  • Emma English
  • Eric S. Kilpatrick
  • Linda Östlundh
  • Hiam Chemaitelly

The research venues where Alberti has published include:

  • Acta Diabetologica
  • British Journal of Diabetes

The scientist's body of work addresses important clinical and biological aspects within their research foci. Topics such as the diagnosis and management of type 2 diabetes, the biological implications of insulin, and complications involving cardiovascular and kidney diseases are central themes.

Best Publications

  • Harmonizing the Metabolic Syndrome A Joint Interim Statement of the International Diabetes Federation Task Force on Epidemiology and Prevention; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; American Heart Association; World Heart Federation; International Atherosclerosis Society; and International Association for the Study of Obesity

    K. G M M Alberti;Robert H. Eckel;Scott M Grundy;Paul Z. Zimmet

  • Report of the expert committee on the diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus

    James R. Gavin;K. G M M Alberti;Mayer B. Davidson;Ralph A. DeFronzo

  • Definition, diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus and its complications. Part 1: diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus provisional report of a WHO consultation.

    K.G.M.M. Alberti;P.Z. Zimmet

  • The metabolic syndrome—a new worldwide definition

    K. George M. M. Alberti;Paul Zimmet;Jonathan Shaw

  • Follow-up report on the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus.

    Saul Genuth;K. G M M Alberti;Peter Bennett;John Buse

  • The metabolic syndrome in children and adolescents - an IDF consensus report.

    Paul Zimmet;K George Mm Alberti;Francine Kaufman;Naoko Tajima

  • Glucose tolerance and mortality: comparison of WHO and American Diabetes Association diagnostic criteria

    K Borch-Johnsen;A Neil;B Balkau;S Larsen

  • Dietary fibres, fibre analogues, and glucose tolerance: importance of viscosity.

    D J Jenkins;T M Wolever;A R Leeds;M A Gassull

  • Impaired glucose tolerance and impaired fasting glycaemia: the current status on definition and intervention

    N. Unwin;J. Shaw;P. Zimmet;K. G. M. M. Alberti

  • A desktop guide to Type 2 diabetes mellitus

    M. Aguilar;K. G.M.M. Alberti;S. A. Amiel;J. Azzopardi

  • Glucose-potassium-insulin infusions in the management of post-stroke hyperglycaemia: the UK Glucose Insulin in Stroke Trial (GIST-UK)

    Christopher S Gray;Anthony J Hildreth;Peter A Sandercock;Janice E O'Connell

  • Heterogeneity of coronary heart disease risk factors in Indian, Pakistani, Bangladeshi, and European origin populations: cross sectional study

    Raj Bhopal;Nigel Unwin;Martin White;Julie Yallop

  • Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion: an approach to achieving normoglycaemia.

    J C Pickup;H Keen;J A Parsons;K G Alberti

  • The metabolic syndrome: useful concept or clinical tool? Report of a WHO Expert Consultation

    R. K. Simmons;K. G. M. M. Alberti;E. A. M. Gale;S. Colagiuri

  • Decrease in Postprandial Insulin and Glucose Concentrations by Guar and Pectin

    David J. A. Jenkins;Anthony R. Leeds;Miguel A. Gassull;Bernard Cochet

  • International textbook of diabetes mellitus

    Ralph A. DeFronzo;Ele Ferrannini;K. George M.M. Alberti;Paul Zimmet;Paul Zimmet

  • Social inequality in coronary risk: central obesity and the metabolic syndrome. Evidence from the Whitehall ii study

    E. J. Brunner;M. G. Marmot;K. Nanchahal;M. J. Shipley

  • HORMONAL AND METABOLIC RESPONSES TO AN ENKEPHALIN ANALOGUE IN NORMAL MAN

    W.A Stubbs;A Jones;C.R.W Edwards;G Delitala

  • Early evidence of ethnic differences in cardiovascular risk: cross sectional comparison of British South Asian and white children

    Peter H Whincup;Julie A Gilg;Olia Papacosta;Carol Seymour

  • Impaired fasting glucose or impaired glucose tolerance. What best predicts future diabetes in Mauritius

    J. E. Shaw;P. Z. Zimmet;M. De Courten;G. K. Dowse

Frequent Co-Authors

Nigel Unwin
Nigel Unwin University of Cambridge
Philip Home
Philip Home Newcastle University
Paul Zimmet
Paul Zimmet Monash University
Hans Ørskov
Hans Ørskov Aarhus University Hospital
Ole Schmitz
Ole Schmitz Aarhus University Hospital
Mark Walker
Mark Walker University of Ottawa
Jaakko Tuomilehto
Jaakko Tuomilehto University of Helsinki
Niels Møller
Niels Møller Aarhus University
Raj Bhopal
Raj Bhopal University of Edinburgh
Jens Otto Lunde Jørgensen
Jens Otto Lunde Jørgensen Aarhus University Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you are interested in a career in healthcare or medicine, there are several flexible educational options available online. Many students choose to start with nursing as a pathway into the medical field. For those seeking an accessible undergraduate option, exploring the easiest bsn program to get into can be a smart first step.

Registered nurses looking to advance their qualifications can consider the most affordable accredited online rn to bsn programs. These programs are ideal for working professionals aiming to balance work and study.

Non-nursing majors who want to transition into advanced nursing roles may benefit from direct entry msn programs for non-nursing majors, which offer an accelerated path into healthcare leadership and specialized positions.

Finally, those committed to research and academic careers in nursing can pursue phd in nursing online programs. These advanced degrees open doors to research, teaching, and upper-level administrative roles within the medical field.

Best Scientists Citing K. G. M. M. Alberti

Trending Scientists