World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
75
Citations
17362
World Ranking
19206
National Ranking
213

Hans Ørskov publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hans Ørskov sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 327 publications — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Hans Ørskov D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hans Ørskov sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 75 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Hans Ørskov is affiliated with Aarhus University Hospital in Denmark. Their professional work centers around medical and clinical environments, as indicated by this primary affiliation.

There are no records available of recent papers, co-authors, or frequent publication venues connected to Hans Ørskov. Similarly, there is no information regarding book publications, main fields or subfields of study, or specific research topics associated with their work.

Details about awards or recognitions received by Hans Ørskov are also not available in the provided data.

This profile summarizes all verifiable aspects of Hans Ørskov's academic affiliations and research output based on the current available information.

Best Publications

  • INHIBITION OF INSULIN SECRETION BY SOMATOSTATIN

    K.G.M.M. Alberti;N. Juel Christensen;S. Engkjær Christensen;Aa. Prange Hansen

  • Free insulin-like growth factors in human obesity

    J. Frystyk;E. Vestbo;C. Skjærbaek;C.E. Mogensen

  • FREE INSULIN-LIKE GROWTH FACTORS (IGF-I AND IGF-II) IN HUMAN SERUM

    Jan Frystyk;Christian Skjærbæk;Bo Dinesen;Hans Ørskov

  • Cubilin is an albumin binding protein important for renal tubular albumin reabsorption

    Henrik Birn;John C. Fyfe;Christian Jacobsen;Francoise Mounier

  • Responses of the growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor axis to exercise, GH administration, and GH withdrawal in trained adult males: a potential test for GH abuse in sport.

    Jennifer D. Wallace;Ross C. Cuneo;Robert Baxter;Hans Ørskov

  • Circulating levels of free insulin-like growth factors in obese subjects: the impact of type 2 diabetes.

    J. Frystyk;C. Skjærbæk;E. Vestbo;S. Fisker

  • Non-competitive time-resolved immunofluorometric assays for determination of human insulin-like growth factor I and II.

    J Frystyk;B Dinesen;H Orskov

  • Diabetes, diabetic angiopathy, and growth hormone.

    K Lundbæk;ViggoA Jensen;T Steen Olsen;H Ørskov

  • Abdominal adiposity rather than age and sex predicts mass and regularity of GH secretion in healthy adults.

    Nina Vahl;Jens O.L. Jørgensen;Christian Skjærbæk;Johannes D. Veldhuis

  • Effects of a growth hormone pulse on total and forearm substrate fluxes in humans.

    N. Møller;J. O. L. Jørgensen;O. Schmitz;J. Møller

  • Insulin-like growth factor (IGF) I, -II, and IGF binding protein-3 and risk of ischemic stroke.

    S. P. Johnsen;H. H. Hundborg;H. T. Sørensen;H. Ørskov

  • Growth hormone administration stimulates energy expenditure and extrathyroidal conversion of thyroxine to triiodothyronine in a dose‐dependent manner and suppresses circadian thyrotrophin levels: studies in GH‐deficient adults

    J. O. L. Jørgensen;J. Møller;T. Laursen;H. Ørskov

  • Cotreatment of acromegaly with a somatostatin analog and a growth hormone receptor antagonist.

    Jens Otto Lunde Jørgensen;Ulla Feldt-Rasmussen;Jan Frystyk;Jian-Wen Chen

  • Fasting unmasks a strong inverse association between ghrelin and cortisol in serum: Studies in obese and normal-weight subjects

    Ulrick Espelund;Troels Krarup Hansen;Kurt Højlund;Henning Beck-Nielsen

  • Growth hormone stimulates bone formation and strength of cortical bone in aged rats

    Troels T. Andreassen;Peter H. Jørgensen;Hans Oxlund;Allan Flyvbjerg

  • A highly sensitive and specific assay for determination of IGF-I bioactivity in human serum

    Jian Wen Chen;Thomas Ledet;Hans Ørskov;Niels Jessen

  • Kidney tissue somatomedin C and initial renal growth in diabetic and uninephrectomized rats.

    A Flyvbjerg;O Thorlacius-Ussing;R Naeraa;J Ingerslev

  • Sandostatin® LAR®: A promising therapeutic tool in the management of acromegalic patients

    I. Lancranjan;C. Bruns;P. Grass;P. Jaquet

  • Continuation of growth hormone (GH) replacement in GH-deficient patients during transition from childhood to adulthood: a two-year placebo-controlled study.

    Nina Vahl;Anders Juul;Jens O. L. Jørgensen;Hans Ørskov

  • Evening versus morning injections of growth hormone (GH) in GH-deficient patients: effects on 24-hour patterns of circulating hormones and metabolites.

    Jens O. L. Jørgensen;Niels Møller;Torsten Lauritzen;K. G. M. M. Alberti

Frequent Co-Authors

Allan Flyvbjerg
Allan Flyvbjerg Steno Diabetes Center
Jan Frystyk
Jan Frystyk Odense University Hospital
Jens Otto Lunde Jørgensen
Jens Otto Lunde Jørgensen Aarhus University Hospital
Niels Møller
Niels Møller Aarhus University
Ole Schmitz
Ole Schmitz Aarhus University Hospital
Jens Sandahl Christiansen
Jens Sandahl Christiansen Aarhus University Hospital
Leif Thuesen
Leif Thuesen Aalborg University
Sten Madsbad
Sten Madsbad University of Copenhagen
Niels E. Skakkebæk
Niels E. Skakkebæk University of Copenhagen
Henning Beck-Nielsen
Henning Beck-Nielsen Odense University Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a medical career in the USA often leads students to consider related online degrees and alternative pathways in healthcare. Many accredited online programs now provide flexible options for career advancement and skill development.

For aspiring healthcare leaders, it’s essential to choose which online healthcare degree programs are recognized for their accreditation by cahme? Accreditation from the CAHME adds value to your MHA degree and unlocks opportunities for leadership roles in hospitals and clinics.

Registered nurses seeking to advance their qualifications can take advantage of online rn to bsn programs no clinicals, allowing them to obtain a Bachelor of Science in Nursing without the need for additional clinical hours, making it convenient for working professionals.

Nurses aiming for the highest level of practice may investigate the fastest online dnp programs to accelerate their progress, while those seeking manageable coursework may prefer online dnp programs designed for greater flexibility.

These options demonstrate the wide range of accessible and accredited pathways for students interested in healthcare careers alongside traditional medical degrees.

Best Scientists Citing Hans Ørskov