World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 32 10830 10141 5667 5177 108 5212

James F. Juola publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by James F. Juola between 1967 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. James F. Juola published across 58 years, from 1967 to 2024, averaging 1.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 7 publications in 1974. 3 of the 112 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1967 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 7. Peak 7 publications in 1974. 1967: 2 publications 1968: 2 publications 1969: 1 publication 1970: 0 publications 1971: 4 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 1 publication 1974: 7 publications 1975: 1 publication 1976: 4 publications 1977: 4 publications 1978: 2 publications 1979: 3 publications 1980: 1 publication 1981: 0 publications 1982: 4 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 2 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 0 publications 1987: 4 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 1 publication 1990: 2 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 2 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 1 publication 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 1 publication 2003: 0 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 0 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 5 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 0 publications 2016: 1 publication 2017: 0 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 2 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 3 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 1 publication 2024: 2 publications
1967 2024

112 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
James F. Juola: publications per year, 1967 to 2024
Year Publications
1967 2
1968 2
1969 1
1970 0
1971 4
1972 0
1973 1
1974 7
1975 1
1976 4
1977 4
1978 2
1979 3
1980 1
1981 0
1982 4
1983 1
1984 2
1985 1
1986 0
1987 4
1988 1
1989 1
1990 2
1991 1
1992 2
1993 0
1994 2
1995 4
1996 1
1997 1
1998 0
1999 0
2000 3
2001 1
2002 1
2003 0
2004 1
2005 0
2006 3
2007 5
2008 3
2009 1
2010 5
2011 3
2012 6
2013 4
2014 2
2015 0
2016 1
2017 0
2018 3
2019 2
2020 2
2021 3
2022 1
2023 1
2024 2
Total 112
Download as CSV

James F. Juola publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James F. Juola sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 101–110 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 108 publications — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736 108
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

James F. Juola D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James F. Juola sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 32–33 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702 32
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

James F. Juola is affiliated with the University of Kansas in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Psychology, with a significant emphasis on Social Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, and Clinical Psychology. Their work also extends into Cognitive Neuroscience and Applied Psychology.

The main topics covered in their research include:

  • Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
  • Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
  • Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Team Dynamics and Performance
  • Personal Information Management and User Behavior

James F. Juola has collaborated frequently with several researchers such as José Manuel Hernández, Miriam Romero, Cristina Casadevante, José Santacreu, and Orlando Ricciardi. These collaborations highlight a network of co-authors with whom they have produced multiple research outputs.

Their publications have appeared in various academic venues, with repeated contributions to:

  • Trends in Psychology
  • International Journal of Human Factors and Ergonomics
  • Current Psychology
  • Memory & Cognition
  • Psychology in the Schools

Recent papers authored or co-authored by James F. Juola include:

  • Are Mastery-Oriented College Students Better Time Managers? (2021) in Trends in Psychology
  • A complementary methodology to assess time management behaviors (2021) in Current Psychology
  • Benefits of multinomial processing tree models with discrete and continuous variables in memory research: an alternative modeling proposal to Juola et al. (2019) (2024) in Memory & Cognition
  • Mastery performance-goal orientation objective test: goal orientation profiles (2024) in Psychology in the Schools
  • Speed reading using Spritz has a cost: Limits when reading a short text (2020) in International Journal of Human Factors and Ergonomics

Best Publications

  • Search and decision processes in recognition memory.

    Richard C. Atkinson;James F. Juola

  • Processing time as influenced by the number of elements in a visual display.

    R. C. Atkinson;J. E. Holmgren;J. F. Juola

  • Audiovisual synchrony and temporal order judgments: Effects of experimental method and stimulus type

    Rlj Rob van Eijk;AG Armin Kohlrausch;JF James Juola;Sljde Steven van de Par

  • Voluntary allocation versus automatic capture of visual attention.

    C. Bruce Warner;James F. Juola;Hideya Koshino

  • Visual search and reading of rapid serial presentations of letter strings, words, and text.

    James F. Juola;Nicklas J. Ward;Timothy McNamara

  • Recognition time for information stored in long-term memory

    J. F. Juola;I. Fischler;C. T. Wood;R. C. Atkinson

  • The “ventriloquist effect”: Visual dominance or response bias?

    Chong S. Choe;Robert B. Welch;Robb M. Gilford;James F. Juola

  • Control of attention around the fovea.

    J.F. Juola;D.G. Bouwhuis;E.E. Cooper;C.B. Warner

  • Dimensions of lexical coding in Chinese and English

    Hsuan-Chih Chen;James F. Juola

  • Evaluation of a Small Socially-Assistive Humanoid Robot in Intelligent Homes for the Care of the Elderly

    Elena Torta;Franz Werner;David O. Johnson;James F. Juola

  • Socially Assistive Robots: A Comprehensive Approach to Extending Independent Living

    David O. Johnson;Raymond H. Cuijpers;James F. Juola;Elena Torta

  • Reading text presented on a small display.

    James F. Juola;Alp Tiritoglu;John Pleunis

  • Attitudes towards socially assistive robots in intelligent homes: results from laboratory studies and field trials

    Elena Torta;Johannes Oberzaucher;Franz Werner;Raymond H. Cuijpers

  • The development of visual information processing skills related to reading.

    James F. Juola;Margaret Schadler;Robert J. Chabot;Mark W. McCaughey

  • Reading Moving Text on a CRT Screen

    Michael M. Granaas;Timothy D. McKay;R. Darrell Laham;Lance D. Hurt

  • Factors influencing readability of rapidly presented text segments

    Thomas G. Cocklin;Nicklas J. Ward;Hsuan-Chih Chen;James F. Juola

  • Memory scanning for words versus categories

    James F. Juola;R.C. Atkinson

  • Isolating visual units in the perception of words and nonwords

    Glen A. Taylor;Timothy J. Miller;James F. Juola

  • Tradeoffs between attentional effects of spatial cues and abrupt onsets

    James F. Juola;Hideya Koshino;C. Bruce Warner

  • Whole-Word Units Are Used before Orthographic Knowledge in Perceptual Development.

    Mark W McCaughey;James F Juola;Margaret Schadler;Nicklas J Ward

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard C. Atkinson
Richard C. Atkinson University of California, San Diego
Timothy P. McNamara
Timothy P. McNamara Vanderbilt University
Bruno G. Breitmeyer
Bruno G. Breitmeyer University of Houston
Stefan Wermter
Stefan Wermter Universität Hamburg

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As you explore studying Psychology in the USA, it’s worth considering related fields that blend psychological knowledge with specialized skills. One popular pathway is Speech-Language Pathology (SLP), which integrates principles of psychology and communication sciences to help individuals with speech and language disorders.

Each state in the U.S. has its own requirements for becoming a licensed SLP. For example, those interested in how to become a speech language pathologist in Tennessee will find specific education and licensing criteria tailored for the state. Similarly, the Texas speech pathologist certification requirements outline unique processes, such as state exams and supervised clinical hours.

For those in other regions, learning about becoming a speech therapist in Utah or how to become a speech language pathologist in Vermont can shed light on comparable pathways with their own licensing standards.

Online psychology and SLP degree programs make it easier to start these careers. Whether focusing on clinical, research, or educational roles, expanding your qualifications in related areas can lead to meaningful and diverse opportunities.

Best Scientists Citing James F. Juola

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles