World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
32
Citations
5212
World Ranking
10830
National Ranking
5667

James F. Juola publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James F. Juola sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 108 publications — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

James F. Juola D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James F. Juola sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

James F. Juola is affiliated with the University of Kansas in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Psychology, with a significant emphasis on Social Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, and Clinical Psychology. Their work also extends into Cognitive Neuroscience and Applied Psychology.

The main topics covered in their research include:

  • Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
  • Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
  • Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Team Dynamics and Performance
  • Personal Information Management and User Behavior

James F. Juola has collaborated frequently with several researchers such as José Manuel Hernández, Miriam Romero, Cristina Casadevante, José Santacreu, and Orlando Ricciardi. These collaborations highlight a network of co-authors with whom they have produced multiple research outputs.

Their publications have appeared in various academic venues, with repeated contributions to:

  • Trends in Psychology
  • International Journal of Human Factors and Ergonomics
  • Current Psychology
  • Memory & Cognition
  • Psychology in the Schools

Recent papers authored or co-authored by James F. Juola include:

  • Are Mastery-Oriented College Students Better Time Managers? (2021) in Trends in Psychology
  • A complementary methodology to assess time management behaviors (2021) in Current Psychology
  • Benefits of multinomial processing tree models with discrete and continuous variables in memory research: an alternative modeling proposal to Juola et al. (2019) (2024) in Memory & Cognition
  • Mastery performance-goal orientation objective test: goal orientation profiles (2024) in Psychology in the Schools
  • Speed reading using Spritz has a cost: Limits when reading a short text (2020) in International Journal of Human Factors and Ergonomics

Best Publications

  • Search and decision processes in recognition memory.

    Richard C. Atkinson;James F. Juola

  • Processing time as influenced by the number of elements in a visual display.

    R. C. Atkinson;J. E. Holmgren;J. F. Juola

  • Audiovisual synchrony and temporal order judgments: Effects of experimental method and stimulus type

    Rlj Rob van Eijk;AG Armin Kohlrausch;JF James Juola;Sljde Steven van de Par

  • Voluntary allocation versus automatic capture of visual attention.

    C. Bruce Warner;James F. Juola;Hideya Koshino

  • Visual search and reading of rapid serial presentations of letter strings, words, and text.

    James F. Juola;Nicklas J. Ward;Timothy McNamara

  • Recognition time for information stored in long-term memory

    J. F. Juola;I. Fischler;C. T. Wood;R. C. Atkinson

  • The “ventriloquist effect”: Visual dominance or response bias?

    Chong S. Choe;Robert B. Welch;Robb M. Gilford;James F. Juola

  • Control of attention around the fovea.

    J.F. Juola;D.G. Bouwhuis;E.E. Cooper;C.B. Warner

  • Dimensions of lexical coding in Chinese and English

    Hsuan-Chih Chen;James F. Juola

  • Evaluation of a Small Socially-Assistive Humanoid Robot in Intelligent Homes for the Care of the Elderly

    Elena Torta;Franz Werner;David O. Johnson;James F. Juola

  • Socially Assistive Robots: A Comprehensive Approach to Extending Independent Living

    David O. Johnson;Raymond H. Cuijpers;James F. Juola;Elena Torta

  • Reading text presented on a small display.

    James F. Juola;Alp Tiritoglu;John Pleunis

  • Attitudes towards socially assistive robots in intelligent homes: results from laboratory studies and field trials

    Elena Torta;Johannes Oberzaucher;Franz Werner;Raymond H. Cuijpers

  • The development of visual information processing skills related to reading.

    James F. Juola;Margaret Schadler;Robert J. Chabot;Mark W. McCaughey

  • Reading Moving Text on a CRT Screen

    Michael M. Granaas;Timothy D. McKay;R. Darrell Laham;Lance D. Hurt

  • Factors influencing readability of rapidly presented text segments

    Thomas G. Cocklin;Nicklas J. Ward;Hsuan-Chih Chen;James F. Juola

  • Memory scanning for words versus categories

    James F. Juola;R.C. Atkinson

  • Isolating visual units in the perception of words and nonwords

    Glen A. Taylor;Timothy J. Miller;James F. Juola

  • Tradeoffs between attentional effects of spatial cues and abrupt onsets

    James F. Juola;Hideya Koshino;C. Bruce Warner

  • Whole-Word Units Are Used before Orthographic Knowledge in Perceptual Development.

    Mark W McCaughey;James F Juola;Margaret Schadler;Nicklas J Ward

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard C. Atkinson
Richard C. Atkinson University of California, San Diego
Timothy P. McNamara
Timothy P. McNamara Vanderbilt University
Bruno G. Breitmeyer
Bruno G. Breitmeyer University of Houston
Stefan Wermter
Stefan Wermter Universität Hamburg

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As you explore studying Psychology in the USA, it’s worth considering related fields that blend psychological knowledge with specialized skills. One popular pathway is Speech-Language Pathology (SLP), which integrates principles of psychology and communication sciences to help individuals with speech and language disorders.

Each state in the U.S. has its own requirements for becoming a licensed SLP. For example, those interested in how to become a speech language pathologist in Tennessee will find specific education and licensing criteria tailored for the state. Similarly, the Texas speech pathologist certification requirements outline unique processes, such as state exams and supervised clinical hours.

For those in other regions, learning about becoming a speech therapist in Utah or how to become a speech language pathologist in Vermont can shed light on comparable pathways with their own licensing standards.

Online psychology and SLP degree programs make it easier to start these careers. Whether focusing on clinical, research, or educational roles, expanding your qualifications in related areas can lead to meaningful and diverse opportunities.

Best Scientists Citing James F. Juola

Trending Scientists