World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 32 10903 10202 5700 5203 73 4437

William Prinzmetal publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by William Prinzmetal between 1976 and 2021, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. William Prinzmetal published across 46 years, from 1976 to 2021, averaging 1.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 14 publications in 2010. 2 of the 77 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1976 to 2021. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 14. Peak 14 publications in 2010. 1976: 1 publication 1977: 1 publication 1978: 1 publication 1979: 2 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 1 publication 1982: 0 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 2 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 2 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 1 publication 1994: 2 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 0 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 1 publication 2004: 2 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 2 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 14 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 0 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 2 publications 2016: 0 publications 2017: 0 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 1 publication 2021: 1 publication
1976 2021

77 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
William Prinzmetal: publications per year, 1976 to 2021
Year Publications
1976 1
1977 1
1978 1
1979 2
1980 0
1981 1
1982 0
1983 1
1984 2
1985 0
1986 2
1987 0
1988 0
1989 3
1990 1
1991 2
1992 1
1993 1
1994 2
1995 2
1996 2
1997 4
1998 3
1999 1
2000 0
2001 3
2002 1
2003 1
2004 2
2005 3
2006 1
2007 2
2008 3
2009 1
2010 14
2011 3
2012 4
2013 0
2014 2
2015 2
2016 0
2017 0
2018 0
2019 0
2020 1
2021 1
Total 77
Download as CSV

William Prinzmetal publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William Prinzmetal sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 71–80 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 73 publications — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461 73
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

William Prinzmetal D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William Prinzmetal sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 32–33 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702 32
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

William Prinzmetal is affiliated with the University of California, Berkeley in the United States. Their research primarily addresses topics related to medicine, with a focus on radiology, nuclear medicine, and imaging. The scientist's work includes key themes involving radiology practices and education, clinical reasoning and diagnostic skills, radiation dose and imaging, as well as artificial intelligence applications in cancer detection.

Their publication record encompasses recent papers such as Serial dependence in the perceptual judgments of radiologists (2021) published in Cognitive Research Principles and Implications, and Simulated tumor recognition in mammograms is biased by serial dependence (2020) published in the Journal of Vision. These works reflect an interest in perceptual and cognitive factors influencing radiological assessment and mammogram interpretation.

William Prinzmetal frequently collaborates with several other researchers. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Mauro Manassi
  • Cristina Ghirardo
  • Teresa Cañas-Bajo
  • David Whitney
  • Zhihang Ren

The scientist's research has been published in venues such as:

  • Cognitive Research Principles and Implications
  • Journal of Vision

William Prinzmetal's work spans multiple subfields within medicine, primarily:

  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
  • Family Practice
  • Artificial Intelligence

The topics that the scientist has covered over multiple publications include:

  • Radiology practices and education
  • Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
  • Radiation Dose and Imaging
  • AI in cancer detection

Best Publications

  • Attention: Reaction Time and Accuracy Reveal Different Mechanisms.

    William Prinzmetal;Christin McCool;Samuel Park

  • Does attention affect visual feature integration

    William Prinzmetal;David E. Presti;Michael I. Posner

  • A formal theory of feature binding in object perception

    F. Gregory Ashby;William Prinzmetal;Richard Ivry;W. Todd Maddox

  • How to see a reading unit

    William Prinzmetal;Rebecca Treiman;Susan H Rho

  • Functional theory of illusory conjunctions and neon colors.

    William Prinzmetal;Boaz Keysar

  • The Phenomenology of Attention

    William Prinzmetal;Ijeoma Nwachuku;Laura Bodanski;Laura Blumenfeld

  • Different effects of voluntary and involuntary attention on EEG activity in the gamma band.

    Ayelet N. Landau;Michael Esterman;Lynn C. Robertson;Shlomo Bentin

  • Cognitive and linguistic factors affect visual feature integration

    Unknown

  • Automatic processes in word perception: an analysis from illusory conjunctions.

    William Prinzmetal;Hunter Hoffman;Kimberly Vest

  • Loosening the constraints on illusory conjunctions: assessing the roles of exposure duration and attention.

    William Prinzmetal;Deborah Henderson;Richard Ivry

  • Voluntary and involuntary attention have different consequences: The effect of perceptual difficulty

    William Prinzmetal;Aleksey Zvinyatskovskiy;Paula Gutierrez;Leo Dilem

  • Asymmetry of visual interference

    Unknown

  • Vertical-horizontal illusion: One eye is better than two

    William Prinzmetal;Laurie Gettleman

  • Effect of feature similarity on illusory conjunctions

    Richard B. Ivry;William Prinzmetal

  • Involuntary attention and brightness contrast

    William Prinzmetal;Virginia Long;James Leonhardt

  • Improved control of exogenous attention in action video game players

    Matthew S Cain;Matthew S Cain;William Prinzmetal;Arthur P Shimamura;Ayelet Nina Landau

  • Cholinergic Enhancement Increases the Effects of Voluntary Attention but Does Not Affect Involuntary Attention

    Ariel Rokem;Ayelet N Landau;Dave Garg;William Prinzmetal

  • Mapping symbols to response modalities : Interference effects on stroop-like tasks

    Juliana V. Baldo;Arthur P. Shimamura;William Prinzmetal

  • The Ponzo illusion and the perception of orientation

    William Prinzmetal;Arthur P. Shimamura;Michelle Mikolinski

  • Dividing attention between the color and the shape of objects

    Anne-Marie Bonnel;William Prinzmetal

  • Involuntary attention and identification accuracy

    William Prinzmetal;Sam Park;Rosalie Garrett

  • The effect of attention on phenomenal length.

    William Prinzmetal;Anna Wilson

  • Visual Feature Integration in a World of Objects

    William Prinzmetal

Frequent Co-Authors

Lynn C. Robertson
Lynn C. Robertson University of California, Berkeley
Richard B. Ivry
Richard B. Ivry University of California, Berkeley
Arthur P. Shimamura
Arthur P. Shimamura University of California, Berkeley
Michael Esterman
Michael Esterman Boston University
David Whitney
David Whitney University of California, Berkeley
Mark D'Esposito
Mark D'Esposito University of California, Berkeley
Diane M. Beck
Diane M. Beck University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Eliot Hazeltine
Eliot Hazeltine University of Iowa
Shlomo Bentin
Shlomo Bentin Hebrew University of Jerusalem
F. Gregory Ashby
F. Gregory Ashby University of California, Santa Barbara

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a psychology degree in the USA opens a wide range of professional opportunities. Many online psychology programs allow flexibility while providing specialized knowledge. Key considerations include understanding the different types of psychologists, such as clinical, counseling, forensic, or organizational psychologists, each requiring unique skills and qualifications.

A common question for aspiring professionals is: can you be a clinical psychologist with a masters? Licensing requirements for clinical psychologists typically demand a doctoral degree, but some entry-level counseling positions may be accessible with a master’s. For those interested in working with younger populations, exploring the salary for a child and adolescent psychologist can help inform your career goals, as salaries may vary based on location, education, and experience.

For students just starting out, there are several entry level child psychology jobs that provide practical experience and a gateway into more advanced roles. Overall, the diverse career paths within psychology mean that online degrees can support various interests, whether your focus is mental health, research, or working with specific populations.

Best Scientists Citing William Prinzmetal

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles