World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
32
Citations
4437
World Ranking
10903
National Ranking
5700

William Prinzmetal publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William Prinzmetal sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 73 publications — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

William Prinzmetal D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William Prinzmetal sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

William Prinzmetal is affiliated with the University of California, Berkeley in the United States. Their research primarily addresses topics related to medicine, with a focus on radiology, nuclear medicine, and imaging. The scientist's work includes key themes involving radiology practices and education, clinical reasoning and diagnostic skills, radiation dose and imaging, as well as artificial intelligence applications in cancer detection.

Their publication record encompasses recent papers such as Serial dependence in the perceptual judgments of radiologists (2021) published in Cognitive Research Principles and Implications, and Simulated tumor recognition in mammograms is biased by serial dependence (2020) published in the Journal of Vision. These works reflect an interest in perceptual and cognitive factors influencing radiological assessment and mammogram interpretation.

William Prinzmetal frequently collaborates with several other researchers. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Mauro Manassi
  • Cristina Ghirardo
  • Teresa Cañas-Bajo
  • David Whitney
  • Zhihang Ren

The scientist's research has been published in venues such as:

  • Cognitive Research Principles and Implications
  • Journal of Vision

William Prinzmetal's work spans multiple subfields within medicine, primarily:

  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
  • Family Practice
  • Artificial Intelligence

The topics that the scientist has covered over multiple publications include:

  • Radiology practices and education
  • Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
  • Radiation Dose and Imaging
  • AI in cancer detection

Best Publications

  • Attention: Reaction Time and Accuracy Reveal Different Mechanisms.

    William Prinzmetal;Christin McCool;Samuel Park

  • Does attention affect visual feature integration

    William Prinzmetal;David E. Presti;Michael I. Posner

  • A formal theory of feature binding in object perception

    F. Gregory Ashby;William Prinzmetal;Richard Ivry;W. Todd Maddox

  • How to see a reading unit

    William Prinzmetal;Rebecca Treiman;Susan H Rho

  • Functional theory of illusory conjunctions and neon colors.

    William Prinzmetal;Boaz Keysar

  • The Phenomenology of Attention

    William Prinzmetal;Ijeoma Nwachuku;Laura Bodanski;Laura Blumenfeld

  • Different effects of voluntary and involuntary attention on EEG activity in the gamma band.

    Ayelet N. Landau;Michael Esterman;Lynn C. Robertson;Shlomo Bentin

  • Cognitive and linguistic factors affect visual feature integration

    Unknown

  • Automatic processes in word perception: an analysis from illusory conjunctions.

    William Prinzmetal;Hunter Hoffman;Kimberly Vest

  • Loosening the constraints on illusory conjunctions: assessing the roles of exposure duration and attention.

    William Prinzmetal;Deborah Henderson;Richard Ivry

  • Voluntary and involuntary attention have different consequences: The effect of perceptual difficulty

    William Prinzmetal;Aleksey Zvinyatskovskiy;Paula Gutierrez;Leo Dilem

  • Asymmetry of visual interference

    Unknown

  • Vertical-horizontal illusion: One eye is better than two

    William Prinzmetal;Laurie Gettleman

  • Effect of feature similarity on illusory conjunctions

    Richard B. Ivry;William Prinzmetal

  • Involuntary attention and brightness contrast

    William Prinzmetal;Virginia Long;James Leonhardt

  • Improved control of exogenous attention in action video game players

    Matthew S Cain;Matthew S Cain;William Prinzmetal;Arthur P Shimamura;Ayelet Nina Landau

  • Cholinergic Enhancement Increases the Effects of Voluntary Attention but Does Not Affect Involuntary Attention

    Ariel Rokem;Ayelet N Landau;Dave Garg;William Prinzmetal

  • Mapping symbols to response modalities : Interference effects on stroop-like tasks

    Juliana V. Baldo;Arthur P. Shimamura;William Prinzmetal

  • The Ponzo illusion and the perception of orientation

    William Prinzmetal;Arthur P. Shimamura;Michelle Mikolinski

  • Dividing attention between the color and the shape of objects

    Anne-Marie Bonnel;William Prinzmetal

  • Involuntary attention and identification accuracy

    William Prinzmetal;Sam Park;Rosalie Garrett

  • The effect of attention on phenomenal length.

    William Prinzmetal;Anna Wilson

  • Visual Feature Integration in a World of Objects

    William Prinzmetal

Frequent Co-Authors

Lynn C. Robertson
Lynn C. Robertson University of California, Berkeley
Richard B. Ivry
Richard B. Ivry University of California, Berkeley
Arthur P. Shimamura
Arthur P. Shimamura University of California, Berkeley
Michael Esterman
Michael Esterman Boston University
David Whitney
David Whitney University of California, Berkeley
Mark D'Esposito
Mark D'Esposito University of California, Berkeley
Diane M. Beck
Diane M. Beck University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Eliot Hazeltine
Eliot Hazeltine University of Iowa
Shlomo Bentin
Shlomo Bentin Hebrew University of Jerusalem
F. Gregory Ashby
F. Gregory Ashby University of California, Santa Barbara

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a psychology degree in the USA opens a wide range of professional opportunities. Many online psychology programs allow flexibility while providing specialized knowledge. Key considerations include understanding the different types of psychologists, such as clinical, counseling, forensic, or organizational psychologists, each requiring unique skills and qualifications.

A common question for aspiring professionals is: can you be a clinical psychologist with a masters? Licensing requirements for clinical psychologists typically demand a doctoral degree, but some entry-level counseling positions may be accessible with a master’s. For those interested in working with younger populations, exploring the salary for a child and adolescent psychologist can help inform your career goals, as salaries may vary based on location, education, and experience.

For students just starting out, there are several entry level child psychology jobs that provide practical experience and a gateway into more advanced roles. Overall, the diverse career paths within psychology mean that online degrees can support various interests, whether your focus is mental health, research, or working with specific populations.

Best Scientists Citing William Prinzmetal

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles