World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
59
Citations
16674
World Ranking
3660
National Ranking
2057

Jacqueline M. Golding publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jacqueline M. Golding sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 94 publications — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Jacqueline M. Golding D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jacqueline M. Golding sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jacqueline M. Golding is affiliated with the University of California, San Francisco in the United States. Their academic profile reflects an ongoing engagement with research activities, although specific details regarding individual publications, fields of study, or research topics are not available.

No records of frequent co-authors or common publication venues have been identified for this researcher. Similarly, there is no data on recent papers, book publications, or awards associated with their academic career.

Given the absence of information on fields, subfields, or main topics of study, it is not possible to provide further details on the specific areas of research focus or thematic interests.

The available data confirms that Jacqueline M. Golding is actively listed as a living researcher, with no indications of being deceased.

Best Publications

  • Intimate Partner Violence as a Risk Factor for Mental Disorders: A Meta-Analysis

    Jacqueline M. Golding

  • The Epidemiology of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder in Five US Communities

    Marvin Karno;Jacqueline M. Golding;Susan B. Sorenson;M. Audrey Burnam

  • Psychiatric disorder in a sample of the general population with and without chronic medical conditions.

    Wells Kb;Golding Jm;Burnam Ma

  • Sexual assault and mental disorders in a community population.

    M. A. Burnam;Judith A. Stein;J. M. Golding;Judith M. Siegel

  • Posttraumatic stress disorder and functioning and quality of life outcomes in a nationally representative sample of male Vietnam veterans.

    Douglas F. Zatzick;Charles R. Marmar;Daniel S. Weiss;Warren S. Browner

  • Somatization in the Community

    Javier I. Escobar;M. Audrey Burnam;Marvin Karno;Alan Forsythe

  • Use of the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) in a community population of mixed ethnicity. Cultural and linguistic artifacts.

    Javier I. Escobar;Audrey Burnam;Marvin Karno;Alan Forsythe

  • THE PREVALENCE OF ADULT SEXUAL ASSAULT THE LOS ANGELES EPIDEMIOLOGIC CATCHMENT AREA PROJECT

    Susan B. Sorenson;Judith A. Stein;Judith M. Siegel;J. M. Golding

  • Sexual assault history and physical health in randomly selected Los Angeles women

    Jacqueline M. Golding

  • Somatization in the community: relationship to disability and use of services.

    J I Escobar;J M Golding;R L Hough;M Karno

  • Social support sources following sexual assault

    Jacqueline M. Golding;Judith M. Siege;Susan B. Sorenson;M. Audrey Burnam

  • Long-term psychological sequelae of child sexual abuse: The Los Angeles Epidemiologic Catchment Area study.

    Judith A. Stein;Jacqueline M. Golding;Judith M. Siegel;M. Audrey Burnam

  • The prevalence of childhood sexual assault. The Los Angeles Epidemiologic Catchment Area Project.

    Judith M. Siegel;Susan B. Sorenson;J. M. Golding;M. A. Burnam

  • Sexual assault history and use of health and mental health services.

    Jacqueline M. Golding;Judith A. Stein;Judith M. Siegel;M. Audrey Burnam

  • Alcohol consumption and mortality. I. Characteristics of drinking groups.

    K M Fillmore;J M Golding;K L Graves;S Kniep

  • Chronic medical conditions in a sample of the general population with anxiety, affective, and substance use disorders.

    K B Wells;J M Golding;M A Burnam

  • Psychiatric disorder and limitations in physical functioning in a sample of the Los Angeles general population.

    K B Wells;J M Golding;M A Burnam

  • Acculturation and the probability of use of health services by Mexican Americans.

    K B Wells;J M Golding;R L Hough;M A Burnam

  • Sexual Assault History and Health Perceptions: Seven General Population Studies

    Golding Jm;Cooper Ml;George Lk

  • Factor structure of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale among Mexican Americans and non-Hispanic Whites.

    Jacqueline M. Golding;Carol S. Aneshensel

Frequent Co-Authors

Kenneth B. Wells
Kenneth B. Wells University of California, Los Angeles
Peter Allebeck
Peter Allebeck Karolinska Institute
Anders Romelsjö
Anders Romelsjö Karolinska Institute
Sharon C. Wilsnack
Sharon C. Wilsnack University of North Dakota
M. Audrey Burnam
M. Audrey Burnam RAND Corporation
Thomas J. Metzler
Thomas J. Metzler Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center
Richard L. Hough
Richard L. Hough Boston Children's Hospital
Anita L. Stewart
Anita L. Stewart University of California, San Francisco
Warren S. Browner
Warren S. Browner California Pacific Medical Center
Daniel S. Weiss
Daniel S. Weiss University of California, San Francisco

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in psychology opens the door to a variety of rewarding professional pathways, including becoming a Licensed Professional Counselor (LPC). Online psychology degrees often serve as a foundation, but additional licensure requirements must be met to practice as an LPC across the United States.

Each state determines its own pathway. For example, you can learn how to get an lpc license in Vermont, which involves earning a master's degree, completing supervised clinical hours, and passing a national exam. If you’re considering other locations, check the specific steps for Virginia licensed professional counselor requirements or review the lpc licensure requirements in Washington.

These requirements typically include accredited academic programs, background checks, and practical experience. Examining the West Virginia licensed professional counselor requirements can also help you understand state-specific expectations. When selecting an online degree, confirm it will qualify you for the licensing requirements in the state where you want to practice.

Best Scientists Citing Jacqueline M. Golding

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles