World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Idan M. Aderka

Idan M. Aderka

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
38
Citations
5979
World Ranking
8888
National Ranking
94

Idan M. Aderka publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Idan M. Aderka sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 112 publications — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Idan M. Aderka D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Idan M. Aderka sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Idan M. Aderka is a researcher affiliated with the University of Haifa in Israel, specializing primarily in the field of psychology. Their scholarly work spans across several subfields including experimental and cognitive psychology, clinical psychology, social psychology, cognitive neuroscience, and applied psychology.

The main topics addressed in their research include anxiety, depression, psychometrics, treatment, cognitive processes, mental health research topics, child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, perfectionism, procrastination, anxiety studies, digital mental health interventions, psychotherapy techniques and applications, as well as neuroscience and music perception.

Aderka has contributed extensively to a number of academic journals, with frequent publications in the Journal of Anxiety Disorders, Behaviour Research and Therapy, Behavior Therapy, Clinical Psychology Review, and Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology.

Some recent noteworthy publications include:

  • A meta-analysis of sudden gains in psychotherapy: Outcome and moderators, 2020, Clinical Psychology Review
  • Out of Sync: Nonverbal Synchrony in Social Anxiety Disorder, 2020, Clinical Psychological Science
  • Emotions in social anxiety disorder: A review, 2023, Journal of Anxiety Disorders
  • Biased distance estimation in social anxiety disorder: A new avenue for understanding avoidance behavior, 2020, Depression and Anxiety
  • A Revised Theory of Sudden Gains in Psychological Treatments, 2021, Behaviour Research and Therapy

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Aderka include Roni Oren-Yagoda, Jonathan G. Shalom, Naama Rozen, Maya Asher, and Asher Y. Strauss.

Best Publications

  • Psychometric properties of the CES-D-10 in a psychiatric sample.

    Thröstur Björgvinsson;Sarah J. Kertz;Joe S. Bigda-Peyton;Katrina L. McCoy

  • Gender differences in social anxiety disorder: A review.

    Maya Asher;Anu Asnaani;Idan M. Aderka

  • Functional impairment in social anxiety disorder

    Idan M. Aderka;Idan M. Aderka;Stefan G. Hofmann;Angela Nickerson;Angela Nickerson;Haggai Hermesh

  • Sudden gains during psychological treatments of anxiety and depression: a meta-analysis.

    Idan M. Aderka;Angela Nickerson;Hans Jakob Bøe;Stefan G. Hofmann

  • Treating Prolonged Grief Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial

    Richard A. Bryant;Lucy Kenny;Amy Joscelyne;Natasha Rawson

  • Prolonged exposure versus dynamic therapy for adolescent PTSD: a pilot randomized controlled trial.

    Eva Gilboa-Schechtman;Edna B. Foa;Naama Shafran;Idan M. Aderka

  • Social anxiety and internet use - A meta-analysis

    Shiri Prizant-Passal;Tomer Shechner;Idan M. Aderka

  • Age of onset in obsessive-compulsive disorder: admixture analysis with a large sample

    G.E. Anholt;I.M. Aderka;A.J.L.M. van Balkom;J.H. Smit

  • Gender differences in social anxiety disorder.

    Maya Asher;Idan M. Aderka

  • Social rank and affiliation in social anxiety disorder.

    Ora Weisman;Idan M. Aderka;Sofi Marom;Haggai Hermesh

  • The impacts of parental loss and adverse parenting on mental health: Findings from the National Comorbidity Survey-Replication.

    Angela Nickerson;Richard A. Bryant;Idan M. Aderka;Devon E. Hinton

  • Discrepancies between implicit and explicit self-esteem among adolescents with social anxiety disorder

    Franziska Schreiber;Christiane Bohn;Idan M. Aderka;Ulrich Stangier

  • Longitudinal associations between post-traumatic distress and depressive symptoms following a traumatic event: a test of three models.

    I. Schindel-Allon;I. M. Aderka;G. Shahar;M. Stein

  • The roles of the social rank and attachment systems in social anxiety

    Idan M. Aderka;Ora Weisman;Golan Shahar;Eva Gilboa-Schechtman

  • The Child PTSD Symptom Scale: psychometric properties in female adolescent sexual assault survivors.

    Seth J. Gillihan;Idan M. Aderka;Phoebe H. Conklin;Sandra Capaldi

  • The impact of depression on the treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder: results from a 5-year follow-up.

    Gideon E. Anholt;Gideon E. Anholt;Idan M. Aderka;Anton J.L.M. van Balkom;Johannes H. Smit

  • Factors affecting treatment efficacy in social phobia: the use of video feedback and individual vs. group formats.

    Idan M. Aderka

  • A meta-analysis of sudden gains in psychotherapy: Outcome and moderators.

    Jonathan G. Shalom;Idan M. Aderka

  • Impact of depression on treatment effectiveness and gains maintenance in social phobia: a naturalistic study of cognitive behavior group therapy

    Sofi Marom;Eva Gilboa-Schechtman;Idan M. Aderka;Abraham Weizman

  • Differences between early and late drop-outs from treatment for obsessive-compulsive disorder

    I.M. Aderka;G.E. Anholt;G.E. Anholt;A.J.L.M. van Balkom;J.H. Smit

  • Direction of influence between posttraumatic and depressive symptoms during prolonged exposure therapy among children and adolescents.

    Idan M. Aderka;Edna B. Foa;Edna Applebaum;Naama Shafran

Frequent Co-Authors

Eva Gilboa-Schechtman
Eva Gilboa-Schechtman Bar-Ilan University
Stefan G. Hofmann
Stefan G. Hofmann Philipp University of Marburg
Haggai Hermesh
Haggai Hermesh Tel Aviv University
Angela Nickerson
Angela Nickerson University of New South Wales
Edna B. Foa
Edna B. Foa University of Pennsylvania
Thröstur Björgvinsson
Thröstur Björgvinsson Harvard University
Richard A. Bryant
Richard A. Bryant University of New South Wales
Ulrich Stangier
Ulrich Stangier Goethe University Frankfurt
Philip Spinhoven
Philip Spinhoven Leiden University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens many doors to diverse and meaningful careers, especially when combined with specialized fields like counseling. Pursuing an online degree can provide the flexibility and access needed to reach your goals. From clinical practice to school, career, or addiction counseling, these programs equip students with essential skills for helping others.

The region and institution you choose can play an important role in your academic experience. For those interested in the best college counseling programs in the Northeast, you'll find top-ranked schools offering robust curricula and strong graduate support. If you’re drawn to metropolitan opportunities, discover New York counseling degree programs known for their diversity and internship networks.

Midwest options like the top counseling degree programs in Ohio stand out for their hands-on training and community partnerships, while those considering the South Central region can review the best college counseling programs in Oklahoma for unique specializations and local demand.

With online pathways becoming more prominent, prospective students can gain high-quality education while balancing personal commitments. Careful research can help you match your interests with the right program and launch a rewarding career in psychology and counseling.

Best Scientists Citing Idan M. Aderka

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles