World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
40
Citations
11319
World Ranking
9076
National Ranking
3858

Harold S. Stone publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Harold S. Stone sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 115 publications — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Harold S. Stone D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Harold S. Stone sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1994 - ACM Fellow
  • 1987 - IEEE Fellow For contributions to parallel and distributed computing, and computer education.

Overview

Harold S. Stone is affiliated with Princeton University in the United States.

Recent research contributions include the paper titled Exceptional Congruences for Eta-quotient newforms, published in 2025 at arXiv (Cornell University).

  • Exceptional Congruences for Eta-quotient newforms, 2025, arXiv (Cornell University)

Frequent coauthors of Harold S. Stone include:

  • Eddie O'Sullivan
  • Swati
  • Xiaolan Jin

Publication venues associated with Harold S. Stone's work include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)

Harold S. Stone has been recognized by the following awards:

  • ACM Fellow, 1994
  • IEEE Fellow, 1987, for contributions to parallel and distributed computing, and computer education

Best Publications

  • Parallel Processing with the Perfect Shuffle

    H.S. Stone

  • A Parallel Algorithm for the Efficient Solution of a General Class of Recurrence Equations

    Peter M. Kogge;Harold S. Stone

  • Multiprocessor Scheduling with the Aid of Network Flow Algorithms

    H.S. Stone

  • A fast direct Fourier-based algorithm for subpixel registration of images

    H.S. Stone;M.T. Orchard;Ee-Chien Chang;S.A. Martucci

  • An Efficient Parallel Algorithm for the Solution of a Tridiagonal Linear System of Equations

    Harold S. Stone

  • A Logic-in-Memory Computer

    Harold S. Stone

  • Optimal partitioning of cache memory

    H.S. Stone;J. Turek;J.L. Wolf

  • Introduction to Computer Architecture

    Harold S. Stone

  • Control of Distributed Processes

    H.S. Stone;S.H. Bokhari

  • Parallel Tridiagonal Equation Solvers

    Harold S. Stone

  • Critical Load Factors in Two-Processor Distributed Systems

    H.S. Stone

  • Discrete Mathematical Structures and Their Applications

    Harold S. Stone

  • Optimizing Murty's ranked assignment method

    M.L. Miller;H.S. Stone;I.J. Cox

  • Footprints in the cache

    Dominique Thiebaut;Harold S. Stone

  • Improving disk cache hit-ratios through cache partitioning

    D. Thiebaut;H.S. Stone;J.L. Wolf

  • A Shuffle-Exchange Network with Simplified Control

    Tomas Lang;Harold S. Stone

  • Multiple reservations and the Oklahoma update

    J.M. Stone;H.S. Stone;P. Heidelberger;J. Turek

  • Synthetic traces for trace-driven simulation of cache memories

    D. Thiebaut;J.L. Wolf;H.S. Stone

  • Posting multiple reservations with a conditional store atomic operations in a multiprocessing environment

    Harold Stuart Stone;Janice Murphy Stone

  • Footprints in the cache

    Harold S. Stone;Dominique Thibaut

  • High-performance computer architecture

    Harold S. Stone

Frequent Co-Authors

Joel L. Wolf
Joel L. Wolf IBM (United States)
Michael T. Orchard
Michael T. Orchard Rice University
Ingemar J. Cox
Ingemar J. Cox University College London
Matthew L. Miller
Matthew L. Miller NEC (United States)
Peter M. Kogge
Peter M. Kogge University of Notre Dame
Yale N. Patt
Yale N. Patt The University of Texas at Austin
Philip Heidelberger
Philip Heidelberger IBM (United States)
Colin McDiarmid
Colin McDiarmid University of Oxford
Lawrence H. Snyder
Lawrence H. Snyder Washington University in St. Louis
Thomas W. Ebbesen
Thomas W. Ebbesen University of Strasbourg

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science opens many doors to related online degrees and professional pathways. For those seeking specialized technical skills, options like an online master’s in electrical engineering degree offer advanced training in essential areas such as circuits, communications, and embedded systems—all from the flexibility of home.

If quick career advancements are the goal, consider picking up certifications that pay well. These programs can be completed in a shorter timeframe and provide a fast route into high-demand tech roles.

For those balancing time and cost, exploring the quickest cheapest masters degree can help you earn an advanced credential without a lengthy commitment or excessive student debt.

Finally, focusing on the most useful masters degrees ensures your investment leads to opportunities in growing tech industries. Each pathway has unique advantages, so assess your interests, schedule, and career goals to choose the best fit.

Best Scientists Citing Harold S. Stone

Recently Published Articles