World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Philip Heidelberger

Philip Heidelberger

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
60
Citations
16321
World Ranking
3207
National Ranking
1558

Philip Heidelberger publications per year

1977: 1 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 2 publications 1980: 2 publications 1981: 4 publications 1982: 3 publications 1983: 4 publications 1984: 3 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 4 publications 1988: 6 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 5 publications 1991: 4 publications 1992: 6 publications 1993: 9 publications 1994: 6 publications 1995: 7 publications 1996: 8 publications 1997: 1 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 7 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 25 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 16 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 13 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 13 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 1 publications
1977 2020

234 publications in total across all disciplines

Philip Heidelberger publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip Heidelberger sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 222 publications — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Philip Heidelberger D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip Heidelberger sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2006 - ACM Gordon Bell Prize The BlueGene/L Supercomputer and Quantum Chromodynamics
  • 1996 - ACM Fellow For contributions to the theory and practice of efficient discrete event simulations.
  • 1994 - IEEE Fellow For contributions to the theory of discrete event simulations.

Overview

Philip Heidelberger is affiliated with IBM in the United States. Their professional work is associated primarily with research and development in computing, particularly in areas aligned with discrete event simulations and quantum computing.

The awards received by Philip Heidelberger highlight contributions in both theoretical and applied computational sciences. They were recognized with the ACM Fellow distinction in 1996 for contributions to the theory and practice of efficient discrete event simulations. Two years earlier, in 1994, they received the IEEE Fellow award for contributions specifically to the theory of discrete event simulations. In 2006, Heidelberger was awarded the ACM Gordon Bell Prize for work related to the BlueGene/L Supercomputer and Quantum Chromodynamics.

The focus on discrete event simulations indicated by these awards suggests their research centers on simulation methods critical to modeling complex systems where events occur at discrete points in time. The connection to the BlueGene/L Supercomputer and Quantum Chromodynamics reflects involvement in high-performance computing and applications of computational methods in physics.

Philip Heidelberger has not been listed with any available recent papers, coauthors, publication venues, book publications, main fields or subfields of study, or main topics of work in the source data.

Best Publications

  • Massively parallel supercomputer

    Matthias A. Blumrich;Dong Chen;George L. Chiu;Thomas M. Cipolla

  • Fast simulation of rare events in queueing and reliability models

    Philip Heidelberger

  • An Overview of the BlueGene/L Supercomputer

    N.R. Adiga;G. Almasi;G.S. Almasi;Y. Aridor

  • A spectral method for confidence interval generation and run length control in simulations

    Philip Heidelberger;Peter D. Welch

  • Overview of the Blue Gene/L system architecture

    A. Gara;M. A. Blumrich;D. Chen;G. L.-T. Chiu

  • Blue Gene/L torus interconnection network

    N. R. Adiga;M. A. Blumrich;D. Chen;P. Coteus

  • Proactive management of software aging

    V. Castelli;R. E. Harper;P. Heidelberger;S. W. Hunter

  • Multi-petascale highly efficient parallel supercomputer

    Sameh Asaad;Ralph E. Bellofatto;Michael A. Blocksome;Matthias A. Blumrich

  • The IBM Blue Gene/Q Compute Chip

    Ruud A. Haring;Martin Ohmacht;Thomas W. Fox;Michael K. Gschwind

  • Portfolio Value-at-Risk with Heavy-Tailed Risk Factors

    Paul Glasserman;Philip Heidelberger;Perwez Shahabuddin

  • Multilevel Splitting for Estimating Rare Event Probabilities

    Paul Glasserman;Philip Heidelberger;Perwez Shahabuddin;Tim Zajic

  • The IBM Blue Gene/Q interconnection network and message unit

    Dong Chen;Noel A. Eisley;Philip Heidelberger;Robert M. Senger

  • A unified framework for simulating Markovian models of highly dependable systems

    A. Goyal;P. Shahabuddin;P. Heidelberger;V.F. Nicola

  • Asymptotically Optimal Importance Sampling and Stratification for Pricing Path‐Dependent Options

    Paul Glasserman;Philip Heidelberger;Perwez Shahabuddin

  • Variance Reduction Techniques for Estimating Value-at-Risk

    Paul Glasserman;Philip Heidelberger;Perwez Shahabuddin

  • Optimization of MPI collective communication on BlueGene/L systems

    George Almási;Philip Heidelberger;Charles J. Archer;Xavier Martorell

  • Ultrascalable petaflop parallel supercomputer

    Matthias A. Blumrich;Dong Chen;George Chiu;Thomas M. Cipolla

  • Convergence properties of infinitesimal perturbation analysis

    Philip Heidelberger;Xi-Ren Cao;Michael A. Zazanis;Rajan Suri

  • Effective bandwidth and fast simulation of ATM intree networks

    Cheng-Shang Chang;Philip Heidelberger;Sandeep Juneja;Perwez Shahabuddin

  • Multiple reservations and the Oklahoma update

    J.M. Stone;H.S. Stone;P. Heidelberger;J. Turek

  • The IBM Blue Gene/Q Interconnection Fabric

    Dong Chen;N. A. Eisley;P. Heidelberger;R. M. Senger

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark E. Giampapa
Mark E. Giampapa IBM (United States)
Alan Gara
Alan Gara IBM (United States)
Paul W. Coteus
Paul W. Coteus IBM (United States)
Sameer Kumar
Sameer Kumar Google (United States)
Valentina Salapura
Valentina Salapura Google (United States)
Paul Glasserman
Paul Glasserman Columbia University
Peter W. Glynn
Peter W. Glynn Stanford University
David M. Nicol
David M. Nicol University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
José E. Moreira
José E. Moreira IBM (United States)
George Almasi
George Almasi IBM (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative online degree options can be a smart move for students interested in Computer Science. There are numerous programs designed for flexibility, affordability, and career advancement.

For those seeking to fast-track their education, quick masters degrees online can help you earn a recognized credential in less time than traditional programs. These accelerated paths are particularly beneficial for professionals who want to upskill quickly.

If you’re considering a master’s program, it’s important to focus on masters degrees that are worth it. These programs are in high demand among employers and offer strong salary potential in technology fields.

Those new to higher education or looking for a stepping stone may find that an associate's degree online is a flexible and cost-effective way to start a tech career. These degrees often provide transfer pathways to four-year programs.

Budget-minded students can also explore cheap online colleges to find reputable programs without heavy debt loads. This makes pursuing a computing career more accessible to all.

Best Scientists Citing Philip Heidelberger

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles