World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
86
Citations
24674
World Ranking
14230
National Ranking
457

Guy Fagherazzi publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Guy Fagherazzi sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 346 publications — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Guy Fagherazzi D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Guy Fagherazzi sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 86 D-Index — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Guy Fagherazzi is affiliated with Institut Gustave Roussy in France and has contributed extensively to medical research, with a particular focus on diabetes and public health. Their work spans various fields within medicine, including endocrinology, diabetes and metabolism, public health, physiology, neurology, and general health professions.

Their recent research includes notable papers such as:

  • Digital Health Strategies to Fight COVID-19 Worldwide: Challenges, Recommendations, and a Call for Papers, 2020, Journal of Medical Internet Research
  • Voice for Health: The Use of Vocal Biomarkers from Research to Clinical Practice, 2021, Digital Biomarkers

Guy Fagherazzi has frequently published in several scientific venues. These include:

  • BMJ Open
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Scientific Reports
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Diabetes

Their collaborative work is reflected through partnerships with a number of coauthors who have frequently appeared alongside them in publications. These coauthors include:

  • Gloria Aguayo
  • Aurélie Fischer
  • Markus Ollert
  • Lu Zhang
  • Abir Elbéji

The main topics covered in their research encompass diverse areas centered mostly on diabetes and related health issues. These topics are:

  • Diabetes Management and Research
  • Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
  • Diabetes Management and Education
  • Diabetes and associated disorders
  • Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Respiratory and Cough-Related Research

With 299 publications in medicine overall, Guy Fagherazzi's research contributes to advancing understanding in multiple subfields of study. The most prominent subfields are:

  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Physiology
  • Neurology
  • General Health Professions

Best Publications

  • Dietary acid load and risk of type 2 diabetes: the E3N-EPIC cohort study

    Guy Fagherazzi;Guy Fagherazzi;Alice Vilier;Alice Vilier;Fabrice Bonnet;Martin Lajous

  • Differences in the prospective association between individual plasma phospholipid saturated fatty acids and incident type 2 diabetes: the EPIC-InterAct case-cohort study.

    Nita G. Forouhi;Albert Koulman;Stephen J. Sharp;Fumiaki Imamura

  • Dietary polyphenol intake in Europe: the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) study

    Raul Zamora-Ros;Viktoria Knaze;Joseph A. Rothwell;Bertrand Hémon

  • Is concordance with World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research guidelines for cancer prevention related to subsequent risk of cancer? : Results from the EPIC study

    Dora Romaguera;Anne Claire Vergnaud;Petra H. Peeters;Petra H. Peeters;Carla H. Van Gils

  • Physical activity and all-cause mortality across levels of overall and abdominal adiposity in European men and women: the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition Study (EPIC)

    Ulf Ekelund;Ulf Ekelund;Heather A. Ward;Teresa Norat;Jian'an Luan

  • Physical Activity and Mortality in Individuals With Diabetes Mellitus: A Prospective Study and Meta-analysis.

    Diewertje Sluik;Brian Buijsse;Rebecca Muckelbauer;Rudolf Kaaks

  • Digital Health Strategies to Fight COVID-19 Worldwide: Challenges, Recommendations, and a Call for Papers.

    Guy Fagherazzi;Catherine Goetzinger;Mohammed Ally Rashid;Gloria A Aguayo

  • The link between family history and risk of type 2 diabetes is not explained by anthropometric, lifestyle or genetic risk factors : The EPIC-InterAct study

    R. A. Scott;C. Langenberg;S. J. Sharp;P. W. Franks;P. W. Franks

  • Fruit and vegetable intake and type 2 diabetes: EPIC-InterAct prospective study and meta-analysis.

    A. J. Cooper;N. G. Forouhi;Z. Ye;B. Buijsse

  • Dietary fibre and incidence of type 2 diabetes in eight European countries: the EPIC-InterAct Study and a meta-analysis of prospective studies

    Anneleen Kuijsten;Dagfinn Aune;Matthias B. Schulze;Teresa Norat

  • Smoking as a major risk factor for cervical cancer and pre‐cancer: Results from the EPIC cohort

    Esther Roura;Xavier Castellsagué;Michael Pawlita;Noémie Travier

  • Consumption of sweet beverages and type 2 diabetes incidence in European adults: results from EPIC-InterAct

    D. Romaguera;T. Norat;P. A. Wark;A. C. Vergnaud

  • Consumption of artificially and sugar-sweetened beverages and incident type 2 diabetes in the Etude Epidémiologique auprès des femmes de la Mutuelle Générale de l'Education Nationale–European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition cohort

    Guy Fagherazzi;Alice Vilier;Daniela Saes Sartorelli;Martin Lajous

  • Age at menopause, reproductive life span, and type 2 diabetes risk: results from the EPIC-InterAct study.

    Judith S. Brand;Yvonne T. Van Der Schouw;N. Charlotte Onland-Moret;Stephen J. Sharp

  • Gene-lifestyle interaction and type 2 diabetes: the EPIC interact case-cohort study.

    Claudia Langenberg;Stephen J. Sharp;Paul W. Franks;Robert A. Scott

  • Coffee Drinking and Mortality in 10 European Countries: A Multinational Cohort Study

    Marc J Gunter;Neil Murphy;Amanda J Cross;Laure Dossus

  • Association Between Soft Drink Consumption and Mortality in 10 European Countries.

    Amy Mullee;Amy Mullee;Dora Romaguera;Jonathan Pearson-Stuttard;Vivian Viallon

  • Serum B Vitamin Levels and Risk of Lung Cancer

    Mattias Johansson;Caroline Relton;Per Magne Ueland;Stein Emil Vollset

  • Abdominal obesity, weight gain during adulthood and risk of liver and biliary tract cancer in a European cohort

    Sabrina Schlesinger;Krasimira Aleksandrova;Tobias Pischon;Veronika Fedirko

  • Adherence to the World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research guidelines and risk of death in Europe: results from the European Prospective Investigation into Nutrition and Cancer cohort study

    Anne Claire Vergnaud;Dora Romaguera;Petra H. Peeters;Carla H. Van Gils

Frequent Co-Authors

Marie-Christine Boutron-Ruault
Marie-Christine Boutron-Ruault University of Paris-Saclay
Kim Overvad
Kim Overvad Aarhus University
Françoise Clavel-Chapelon
Françoise Clavel-Chapelon Institut Gustave Roussy
Anne Tjønneland
Anne Tjønneland University of Copenhagen
Elio Riboli
Elio Riboli Imperial College London
Rosario Tumino
Rosario Tumino Provincial Health Authority of Syracuse
Heiner Boeing
Heiner Boeing German Institute of Human Nutrition
Petra H.M. Peeters
Petra H.M. Peeters Utrecht University
Nicholas J. Wareham
Nicholas J. Wareham University of Cambridge
Antonia Trichopoulou
Antonia Trichopoulou National and Kapodistrian University of Athens

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Medicine in the USA opens doors to diverse careers both within and beyond clinical practice. With healthcare rapidly evolving, related online degrees can provide flexible and accelerated ways to enter or advance in the field.

For those interested in leadership or policy, earning a degree in healthcare administration can lead to roles in hospital management, operations, and healthcare consulting. Additionally, nurses seeking to progress quickly may consider adn to np bridge programs, which offer a streamlined path from associate to nurse practitioner status.

Wellness and preventative care are also growing fields. Those passionate about nutrition can explore online degrees in nutrition—ideal for careers in dietetics, wellness coordination, or health education. For advanced roles in administration, accredited mha programs pave the way to executive leadership in healthcare organizations.

These related pathways ensure students can find a niche that matches both their interests and the future demands of U.S. healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Guy Fagherazzi

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles